DongFReutherAMagi-GalluzziCZhouM: Pathologic stage migration has slowed in the late PSA era. Urology2007; 70(5): 839–42
3.
Bill-AxelsonAHolmbergLRuutuMHäggmanMAnderssonSOBratellSSpångbergABuschCNordlingSGarmoHPalmgrenJAdamiHONorlénBJJohanssonJE; Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group Study No. 4. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med.2005 (May 12); 352(19): 1977–84
4.
SchuesslerWKavoussiLRClaymanRVVancailleTH: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial case report. J Urol1992; 147:246A
DasguptaPJonesAGillIS: Robotic urological surgery: A perspective. BJU Int2005; 95: 20–23.
10.
AhleringTESkareckyDLeeDClaymanRV: Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: Initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol2003 Nov; 170(5): 1738–41
PalmerKJLoweGJCoughlinGDPatilNPatelVR: Launching a successful robotic surgery program. J Endourol2008 Apr; 22(4): 819–24
13.
PatelVRTullyASHolmesRLindsayJ: Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting—the learning curve and beyond: Initial 200 cases. J Urol2005; 174: 269–72.
14.
SmithJA: Robotically assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Am J Surg2004; 188: 63–67
15.
SchroeckFRde SousaCAKalmanRA: Trainees do not negatively impact the institutional learning curve for robotic prostatectomy as characterized by operative time, estimated blood loss, and positive surgical margin rate. Urology.2008 Apr; 71(4): 597–601
16.
RoccoBMateiDV: Robotic vs open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive center: A match pair analysis. BJU Int2009 (in Press)
