KursaKLattanzaLDiaoERempelD: In vivo flexor tendon forces increase with finger and wrist flexion during active finger flexion and extension. J Orthop Res2006;24:763–769.
2.
SchuindFGarcia-EliasMCooneyWPAnK-N: Flexor tendon forces: In vivo measurements. J Hand Surg1992;17A:291–298.
ZhaoCAmadioPCZobitzMEMomoseTCouvreurPAnK-N: Gliding resistance after repair of partially lacerated human flexor digitorum profundus tendon in vitro. Clin Biomech2001;16:696–701.
5.
MomoseTAmadioPCZhaoCZobitzMEAnK-N: The effect of knot location, suture material, and suture size on the gliding resistance of flexor tendons. J Biomed Mater Res2000;53:806–811.
6.
HalikisMNManskePRKubotaHAokiM: Effect of immobilization, immediate mobilization, and delayed mobilization on the resistance to digital flexion using a tendon injury model. J Hand Surg1997;22A:464–472.
7.
McDowellCLMarqueenTJYagerDOwenJRWayneJS: Characterization of the tensile properties and histologic/biochemical changes in normal chicken tendon at the site of suture insertion. J Hand Surg2002;27A:605–614.
8.
HitchcockTFLightTRBunchWHKnightGWSartoriMJPatwardhanAGHollyfieldRL: The effect of immediate constrained digital motion on the strength of flexor tendon repairs in chickens. J Hand Surg1987;12A:590–595.
9.
HatanakaHManskePR: Effect of suture size on locking and grasping flexor tendon repair techniques. Clin Orthop2000;375:267–274.
10.
WadaAKubotaHAkiyamaTHatanakaHMiuraHIwamotoY: Effect of absorbable polydioxanone flexor tendon repair and restricted active mobilization in a canine model. J Hand Surg2001a;26A:398–406.
11.
WadaAKubotaHMiyanishiKHatanakaHMiuraHIwamotoY: Comparison of postoperative early active mobilization and immobilization in vivo utilising four-strand flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg2001b;26B:301–306.
12.
SavageR: In vitro studies of a new method of flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg1985;10B:135–141.
13.
BarrieKATomakSLCholewickiJMerrellGAWolfeSW: Effect of suture locking and suture caliber on fatigue strength of flexor tendon repairs. J Hand Surg2001;26A:340–346.
14.
TarasJSRaphaelJSMarczykSCBauerleWB: Evaluation of suture caliber in flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg2001;26A:1100–1104.
15.
HotokezakaSManskePR: Differences between locking loops and grasping loops: Effects on 2-strand core suture. J Hand Surg1997;22A:995–1003.
16.
WadaAKubotaHHatanakaHHotokezakaSMiuraHIwamotoY: The mechanical properties of locking and grasping suture loop configurations in four-strand core suture techniques. J Hand Surg2000;25B:548–551.
17.
XieRGTangJB: Investigation of locking configurations for tendon repair. J Hand Surg2005;30A:461–465.
18.
HatanakaHManskePR: Effect of the cross-sectional area of locking loops in flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg1999;24A:751–760.
19.
XieRGXueHGGuJH: Effects of locking area on strength of 2- and 4-strand locking tendon repairs. J Hand Surg2005;30A:455–460.
20.
KubotaHAokiMPruittDLManskePR: Mechanical properties of various circumferential tendon suture techniques. J Hand Surg1996;21B:474–480.
21.
LotzJCHariharanJSDiaoE: Analytic model to predict the strength of tendon repairs. J Orthop Res1998;16:399–405.
22.
MerrelGAWolfeSWKacenaWJGaoYCholewickiJKacenaMA: The effect of increased peripheral suture purchase on the strength of flexor tendon repairs. J Hand Surg2003;28A:464–468.
23.
ViinikainenAGöranssonHHuovinenKKellomäkiMRokkanenP: A comparative analysis of the biomechanical behaviour of five flexor tendon core sutures. J Hand Surg2004;29B:536–543.
24.
MillerBDoddsSDDeMarsAZagoreasNWaitayawinyuTTrumbleTE: Flexor tendon repairs: The impact of Fiberwire on grasping and locking core sutures. J Hand Surg2007;32A:591–596.
25.
ViinikainenAGóranssonHHuovinenKKellomäkiMTörmäläPRokkanenP: The strength of the 6-strand modified Kessler repair performed with triple-stranded or triple-stranded bound suture in a porcine extensor tendon model. An ex vivo study. J Hand Surg2007;32A:510–517.
26.
TsugeKIkutaYMatsuishiY: Repair of flexor tendons by intratendinous tendon suture. J Hand Surg1977;2:436–440.
27.
PenningtonDG: The locking loop tendon suture. Plast Reconstr Surg1979;63:648–652.
28.
BainbridgeLCRobertsonCGilliesDElliotDA Comparison of post-operative mobilization of flexor tendon repairs with “passive flexion-active extension” and” controlled active motion” techniques. J Hand Surg1994;19B:517–521.
29.
SavageRRisitanoG: Flexor tendon repair using a “six strand” method of repair and early active mobilisation. J Hand Surg1989;14B:396–399.
30.
ShaiebMDSingerDI: Tensile strengths of various suture techniques. J Hand Surg1997;22B:764–767.
31.
McLarneyEHoffmanHWolfeSW: Biomechanical analysis of the cruciate four-strand flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg1999;24A:295–301.
32.
BarrieKATomakSLCholewickiJWolfeSW: The role of multiple strands and locking sutures on gap formation of flexor tendon repairs during cyclical loading. J Hand Surg2000;25A:714–720.
33.
NoguchiMSeilerJGGelbermanRHSofrankoRAWooSL-Y: In Vitro biomechanical analysis of suture methods for flexor tendon repair. J Orthop Res1993;11:603–611.
34.
GreenwaldDPHongH-ZMayJW: Mechanical analysis of tendon suture techniques. J Hand Surg1994;19A:641–647.
35.
SandowMJMcMahonMM: Single-cross grasp six-strand repair for acute flexor tenorrhaphy. Modified Savage technique. Atlas Hand Clin1996;1:41–64.
36.
SandersDWMilneADDobravecAMacDermidJJohnsonJAKingGJW: Cyclic testing of flexor tendon repairs: An in vitro biomechanical study. J Hand Surg1997;22A:1004–1010.
37.
KubotaHMiyanishiKHoshinoSHatanakaHIwamotoY: Effect of a new repair technique on biomechanical properties of canine flexor tendons — In vitro study. Hand Surg1998;3:247–255.
38.
AokiMPruittDLKubotaHManskePR: Effect of suture knots on tensile strength of repaired canine flexor tendons. J Hand Surg1995;20B:72–75.
39.
TangJBShiDGuYQChenJCZhauB: Double and multiple looped suture tendon repair. J Hand Surg1994;19B:699–703.
40.
KusanoNYoshizuTMakiY: Experimental study of two new flexor tendon suture techniques for postoperative early active flexion exercises. J Hand Surg1999;24B:152–156.
41.
ViinikainenA: Development of new flexor tendon repair technique performed with bioabsorbable poly-L/D-lactide (PLDLA) suture. An experimental ex vivo study. Ph.D. Thesis. Univ Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland, 2008.
42.
LimBHTsaiT-M: The six-strand technique for flexor tendon repair. Atlas Hand Clin1996;1:65–76.
43.
DonaETurnerALGianoutsosMPWalshWR: Biomechanical properties of four circumferential flexor tendon suture techniques. J Hand Surg2003;28A:824–831.
44.
CaoYZhuBXieRGTangJB: Influence of core suture purchase length on strength of four-strand tendon repairs. J Hand Surg2006;31A:107–112.
45.
TangJBZhangYCaoYXieRG: Core suture purchase affects strength of tendon repairs. J Hand Surg2005;30A:1262–1266.
46.
ManskePRLeskerPA: Flexor tendon nutrition. Hand Clin1985;1:13–24.
47.
KomanduriMPhillipsCSMassDP: Tensile strength of flexor tendon repairs in a dynamic cadaver model. J Hand Surg1996;21A:605–611.
48.
PruittDLAokiMManskePR: Effect of suture knot location on tensile strength after flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg1996;21A:969–973.
49.
AlavanjaGDaileyEMassDP: Repair of zone II flexor digitorum profundus lacerations using varying suture sizes: A comparative biomechanical study. J Hand Surg2005;30A:448–454.
50.
LawrenceTMDavisTRC: A biomechanical analysis of suture materials and their influence on a four-strand flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg2005;30A:836–841.
51.
TrailIAPowellESNobleJ: An evaluation of suture materials used in tendon surgery. J Hand Surg1989;14B:422–427.
52.
KujalaSPajalaAKallioinenMParmilaATuukkanenJRyhänenJ: Biocompatibility and strength properties of nitinol shape memory alloy suture in rabbit tendon. Biomaterials2004;25:353–358.
53.
VizesiFJonesCLotzNGianoutsosMWalshWR: Stress relaxation and creep: Viscoelastic properties of common suture materials used for flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg2008;33A:241–246.
54.
ViinikainenAGöranssonHHuovinenKKellomäkiMTörmäläPRokkanenP: Material and knot properties of braided polyester (TicronrG) and bioabsorbable poly-L/D-lactide (PLDLA) 96/4 sutures. J Mat Sci Mat Med2006;17:169–177.
55.
BourneRBBitarHAndreaePRMartinLMFinlayJBMarquisF: In-vivo comparison of four absorbable sutures: Vicryl, Dexon Plus, Maxon and PDS. Can J Surg1988;31:43–45.
56.
KangasJPaasimaaSMäkeläPLeppilahtiJTörmäläPWarisTAshammakhiN: Comparison of strength properties of poly-L/D-lactide (PLDLA) 96/4 and Polyglyconate (MaxonrG) sutures: In vitro, in the subcutis, and in the Achilles tendon of rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res2001;58:121–126.
57.
KangasJPajalaALeppilahtiJRyhänenJLänsmanSTörmäläPWarisTAshammakhiN: Histomorphometric analysis of poly-L/D-lactide 96/4 sutures in the gastrocnemius tendon of rabbits. Int J Artif Organs2006;29:893–899.
58.
AokiMManskePRPruittDLLarsonBJ: Tendon repair using flexor tendon splints: An experimental study. J Hand Surg1994;19A:984–990.
59.
GordonLTolarMRaoKTRitchieRORabinowitzSLambRP: Flexor tendon repair using a stainless steel internal anchor. Biomechanical study on human cadaver tendons. J Hand Surg1998;23B:37–40.
60.
SilfverskiöldKLAnderssonCH: Two new methods of tendon repair: An in vitro evaluation of tensile strength and gap formation. J Hand Surg1993;18A:58–65.
61.
SuBWSolomosMBarrowASenogeMEGilbertiMLubbersLDiaoEQuitkinHMRosenwasserMP: Device for zone-II flexor tendon repair. A multicenter, randomized, blinded, clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg2005;87:923–935.
62.
WolfeSWWillisAACampbellDClabeauxJWrightTM: Biomechanic comparison of the Teno Fix tendon repair device with the cruciate and modified Kessler repairs. J Hand Surg2007;32A:356–366.
63.
ListerGDKleinertHEKutzJEAtasoyE: Primary flexor tendon repair followed by immediate controlled mobilization. J Hand Surg1977;2:441–451.
64.
WadePJFWetherellRGAmisAA: Flexor tendon repair: Significant gain in strength from the Halsted peripheral suture technique. J Hand Surg1989;14B:232–235.
65.
DiaoEHariharanJSSoejimaOLotzJC: Effect of peripheral suture depth on strength of tendon repairs. J Hand Surg1996;21A:234–239.
66.
LinG-TAnK-NAmadioPCCooneyWP: Biomechanical studies of running suture for flexor tendon repair in dogs. J Hand Surg1988;13A:553–558.
67.
MashadiZBAmisAA: Strength of the suture in the epitenon and within the tendon fibres: Development of stronger peripheral suture technique. J Hand Surg1992;17B:171–175.
68.
LabanaNMesserTLautenschlagerENagdaSNagleD: A biomechanical analysis of the modified Tsuge suture technique for repair of flexor tendon lacerations. J Hand Surg2001;26B:297–300.