Abstract
Background and Aims:
In patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), parathyroid imaging is nowadays routinely used for the purpose to perform a focused unilateral minimally invasive operation. The outcome of this new strategy has, however, not been established in randomised trials.
Material and Methods:
Patients were randomised to either preoperative localisation with sestamibi scintigraphy and ultrasonography (group I) or no preoperative localisation (group II). In group I, a minimally invasive parathyroidectomy was performed in patients in whom both localisation studies were consistent with a single pathological gland, whereas a conventional bilateral neck exploration was performed in cases with negative localisation findings. In group II all patients underwent conventional bilateral neck exploration. Primary outcome measure was normocalcaemia at 6 months postoperatively.
Results:
In the preoperative localisation group (group I) 23/50 (46%) of the patients could be operated on with the focused operation whereas 26/50 (52%) were operated on by bilateral neck exploration. All patients in the no localisation group (group II; n=50) were operated on with the intended bilateral neck operation. Normocalcaemia was obtained in 96% and 94% in group I and II, respectively. Total (localisation and operative) costs were 21% higher in group I.
Conclusions:
Routine preoperative localisation, with the intention to perform minimally invasive parathyroidectomy, is not cost effective if concordant results of scintigraphy and ultrasonography are a prerequisite for the focused operation. Less than half of the patients were successfully managed with this strategy, at a higher cost and without obtaining a more favourable clinical outcome.