McCraighLBCNational Hospital Ambulatory Care Survey. 1999 emergency department summary. Advance data from vital and health statistics. No 320. Hyattsville (Maryland): National Center for Health Statistics, 2001: 24 (DHS publication no (PHS) 2001-125001-0357).
2.
PaulsonEKKaladyMFPappasTNClinical practice. Suspected appendicitis. N Engl J Med2003; 348(3): 236–242.
3.
DeeksJJSystematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. BMJ2001;323(7305):157–162.
4.
AddissDGShafferNFowlerBSTauxeRVThe epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol1990;132(5):910–925.
5.
LuckmannRIncidence and case fatality rates for acute appendicitis in California. A population-based study of the effects of age. Am J Epidemiol1989; 129(5): 905–918.
6.
AnderssonRHuganderAThulinANyströmPOOlaisonGIndications for operation in suspected appendicitis and incidence of perforation. BMJ1994;308(6921):107–110.
7.
KørnerHSöndenaaKSöreideJAAndersenENystedALendeTH.: Incidence of acute nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: Age-specific and sex-specific analysis. World J Surg1997;21(3):313–317.
8.
ArnbjörnssonEEpidemiology of appendicitis. Läkartid-ningen1983;80(45):4278–4279.
9.
NoerTDecreasing incidence of acute appendicitis. Acta Chir Scand1975;141(5):431–432.
10.
KørnerHSöreideJAPedersenEJBruTSöndenaaKVattenLStability in incidence of acute appendicitis. A population-based longitudinal study. Dig Surg2001; 18(1): P. 61–66.
11.
ReidRIDobbsBRFrizelleFARisk factors for post-appendi-cectomy intra-abdominal abscess. Aust N Z J Surg1999;69(5):373–374.
van WayCWDMurphyJRDunnELElerdingSCA feasibility study of computer aided diagnosis in appendicitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet1982;155(5):685–688.
14.
GoughIRA study of diagnostic accuracy in suspected acute appendicitis. Aust N Z J Surg1988;58(7):555–559.
15.
WilcoxRTTraversoLWHave the evaluation and treatment of acute appendicitis changed with new technology? Surg Clin North Am1997;77(6):1355–1370.
16.
CoopermanMComplications of appendectomy. Surg Clin North Am1983;63(6):1233–1247.
17.
ScheyeTVanneuvilleGTrial of a diagnostic score in painful abdominal syndromes suggestive of appendicitis in children over 3. J Chir (Paris)1988;125(3):166–169.
18.
WilliamsRIntroduction and historical perspective. In: WilliamsRMP editor Pathology of the appendix and its surgical treatment. London: Chapman & Hall Medical; 1994. p. 1–8.
19.
TsugawaKKoyanagiNHashizumeMTomikawaMAyukawaKAkahoshiK.: A comparison of an open and laparoscopic appendectomy for patients with liver cirrhosis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech2001;11(3):189–194.
20.
EllisHMoranBJThompsonJNParkerMCWilsonMSMenziesD.: Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet1999;353(9163):1476–1480.
21.
BaigrieRJDehnTCFowlerSMDunnDCAnalysis of 8651 appendicectomies in England and Wales during 1992. Br Surg1995; 82(7):933.
22.
FenyöGAppendectomy in Sweden. A survey and proposal for quality indicators. Nord Med1995; 110(4): 111–113.
23.
HayJMFlamantYQuantified symptomatology of acute appendicitis in adults. The signs and their value. Rev Prat1992; 42(6): 678–687.
CobbenLPde Van OtterlooAMPuylaertJBSpontaneously resolving appendicitis: Frequency and natural history in 60 patients. Radiology2000;215(2):349–352.
27.
ErikssonSGranströmLRandomized controlled trial of appendicectomy versus antibiotic therapy for acute appendicitis. Br J Surg1995;82(2):166–169.
28.
OliakDYaminiDUdaniVMLewisRJVargasHArnellT.: Nonoperative management of perforated appendicitis without periappendiceal mass. Am J Surg2000;179(3):177–181.
29.
PickuthDHeywang-KobrunnerSHSpielmannRPSuspected acute appendicitis: Is ultrasonography or computed tomography the preferred imaging technique? Eur J Surg2000;166(4):315–319.
30.
DohertyGMLewisFRJrAppendicitis: Continuing diagnostic challenge. Emerg Med Clin North Am1989;7(3):537–553.
31.
HawthornIEAbdominal pain as a cause of acute admission to hospital. J R Coll Surg Edinb1992;37(6):389–393.
32.
BerryJJrMaltRA. Appendicitis near its centenary. Ann Surg1984; 200(5): 567–575.
33.
LewisFHJWBoeyJDunphyJEAppendicitis: A critical review of diagnosis and treatment in 1, 000 cases. Arch Surg1975; 110: 667–684.
34.
SpitzLAcute appendicitis: An analysis of 666 appendectomies in adults 1959–1968). S Afr J Surg1969; 7: 129–137.
35.
BjerregaardBBrynitzSHolst-ChristensenJJessPKalajaELund-KristensenJ.: The reliability of medical history and physical examination in patients with acute abdominal pain. Methods Inf Med1983;22(1):15–18.
36.
MittelpunktANCurrent features in the treatment of acute appendicitis: An analysis of 1000 consecutive cases. Surgery1966;142(60):971–975.
37.
SilbermanVAAppendectomy in a large metropolitan hospital. Retrospective analysis of 1, 013 cases. Am J Surg1981; 142(5): 615–618.
38.
BabcockJMAcute appendicitis: An analysis of 1662 consecutive cases. Ann Surg1959;150:131–141.
39.
JessPBjerregaardBBrynitzSHolst-ChristensenJKalajaELund-KristensenJAcute appendicitis. Prospective trial concerning diagnostic accuracy and complications. Am J Surg1981; 141(2): 232–234.
40.
PieperRKagerLNasmanPClinical significance of mucosal inflammation of the vermiform appendix. Ann Surg1983;197(3):368–374.
41.
ClementsDOJEPowersJHAcute appendicitis in a rural community — Series IV. Ann Surg1965;161:231–237.
42.
KazarianKKRoederWJMersheimerWLDecreasing mortality and increasing morbidity from acute appendicitis. Am J Surg1970;119(6):681–685.
43.
GarbuttJMSoperNJShannonWDBoteroALittenbergBMeta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc1999;9(1):17–26.
44.
FenyöGComputer-aided diagnosis and decision-making in acute abdominal pain. Dig Dis1990;8(3):125–137.
BjerregaardBBHolst-ChristensenJHildenJDe DombalFTHorrocksJCComputer-aided diagnosis of the acute abdomen: A system from Leeds used on Copenhagen patients. In: de DombalFTG editor. Decision making and medical care. Amsterdam: North Holland Publ Co; 1976. p. 165–171.
47.
KörnerHSöndenaaKSöreideJAAndersenENystedALendeTHStructured data collection improves the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Br J Surg1998;85(3):341–344.
48.
OhmannCFCVerreetPRBohnerHRoherHDDiagnosis in acute abdominal pain: Do we need computer-aided diagnosis? Theoretical Surgery1994;9:111–121.
49.
RichardsonMRemarks upon appendicitis, based upon a personal experience of one hundred and eighty-one cases. Am Med Sci1894;107:1–23.
50.
de DombalFTLeaperDJStanilandJRMcCannAPHorrocksJCComputer-aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain. Br Med J1972;2(5804):9–13.
51.
de DombalFTLeaperDJHorrocksJCStanilandJRMcCannAPHuman and computer-aided diagnosis of abdominal pain: Further report with emphasis on performance of clinicians. Br Med J1974;1(904):376–380.
52.
StanilandJRClampSEde DombalFTSolheimKHansenSRonsenK.: Presentation and diagnosis of patients with acute abdominal pain: Comparisons between Leeds, U.K. and Akershus county, Norway. Ann Chir Gynaecol1980; 69(6): 245–250.
53.
FlamantYLacaineFHayJMMaillardJNAcute abdominal pain syndrome. The computer as an aid to diagnosis. Nouv Presse Med1981; 10(46): 3767–3769.
54.
OrientJMEvaluation of abdominal pain: Clinicians' performance compared with three protocols. South Med J1986;79(7):793–799.
55.
OhmannCFrankeCYangQClinical benefit of a diagnostic score for appendicitis: Results of a prospective interventional study. German Study Group of Acute Abdominal Pain. Arch Surg1999; 134(9): 993–996.
56.
AnderssonREHuganderAPGhaziSHRavnHOffenbartlSKNyströmPO.: Diagnostic value of disease history, clinical presentation, and inflammatory parameters of appendicitis. World J Surg1999;23(2):133–140.
57.
KørnerHSöreideJASöndenaaKDiagnostic accuracy of inflammatory markers in patients operated on for suspected acute appendicitis: A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Eur J Surg1999;165(7):679–685.
58.
AnderssonREMeta-analysis of the clinical and laboratory diagnosis of appendicitis. Br J Surg2004;91(1):28–37.
59.
ZweigMHCampbellGReceiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: A fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem1993;39(4):561–577.
60.
BurdickWC In: BurdickWCCydulkaDCHamiltonRKLoiselleRJNiemannJM. eds. The Year Book of EMERGENCY MEDICINE. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Inc.; 2001. p. 137–410.
61.
FunakiBGrosskreutzSRFunakiCNUsing unenhanced helical CT with enteric contrast material for suspected appendicitis in patients treated at a community hospital. AJR Am Roentgenol1998; 171(4): P 997–1001.
62.
RaoPMRheaJTNovellineRAMcCabeCJLawrasonJNBergerDL.: Helical CT technique for the diagnosis of appendicitis: Prospective evaluation of a focused appendix CT examination. Radiology1997; 202(1): P 139–144.
63.
OomsHWKoumansRKHoKangYouPJPuylaertJBUltrasonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Br J Surg1991;78(3):315–18.
64.
PuylaertJBImaging and intervention in patients with acute right lower quadrant disease. Baillieres Clin Gastroenterol1995;9(1):37–51.
65.
DouglasCDMacPhersonNEDavidsonPMGaniJSRandomised controlled trial of ultrasonography in diagnosis of acute appendicitis, incorporating the alvarado score. BMJ2000;321(7266):919–922.
66.
AnderssonRLambeMBergströmRFertility patterns after appendicectomy: Historical cohort study. BMJ1999;318(7189):963–967.
67.
BlomqvistPGAnderssonREGranathFLambeMPEkbomARMortality after appendectomy in Sweden, 1987–1996). Ann Surg2001; 233(4): 455–460.
68.
HughTBHughTJAppendicectomy — Becoming a rare event? Med J Aust2001;175(1):7–8.