PerryNBroedersMde WolCTörnbergSEuropean guidelines for quality assurance in mammography screening. European Commission. Luxembourg, 2001; 1–367.
2.
DuffySWTabarLFagerbergGGadAGrontoftOSouthMCDayNEBreast screening, prognostic factors and survival — Results from the Swedish two-county study. Br Cancer1991;64:1133–1138.
3.
SmartCRByrneCSmithRAGarfinkelLLettonAHDoddGDBeahrsOHTwenty-year follow-up of the breast cancers diagnosed during the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project. CA Cancer J Clin1997;47:134–149.
4.
MillerBAFeuerEJHankeyBFRecent incidence trends for breast cancer in women and the relevance of early detection: An update. CA Cancer J Clin1993; 43:27–41.
5.
DayNEWilliamsDRRKhawKTBreast cancer screening programmes: The development of a monitoring and evaluation system. Br J Cancer1989; 59:954–958.
6.
MoodyCCorderAMulleeMAGuyerPRubinCCrossMRoyleGTTaylorIThe impact of the first 3 years of breast cancer screening on the overall presentation of breast cancer. J R Soc Med1994;87:259–262.
7.
RickardMDiagnosis of small sized invasive breast cancer by an Australian mammography screening service: Surrogate end-points for mortality reduction. Aust N Z J Surg1998;68:415–8.
8.
KerlikowskeKEfficacy of screening mammography among women aged 40 to 49 years and 50 to 69 years: Comparison of relative and absolute benefit. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr1997; 79–86.
9.
RostgaardKHolstHMouridsenHTLyngeEDo clinical databases render population-based cancer registers obsolete? The example of breast cancer in Denmark. Cancer Causes Control2000;11:669–674.
10.
Copenhagen Mammography Screening Evaluation Group: Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991—March 1997. APMIS1998; 106: 1–44.
11.
FracheboudJNation-wide breast cancer screening in the Netherlands: Results of initial and subsequent screening 1990–1995). National evaluation team for breast cancer screening. Int J Cancer1998; 75: 694–8.
12.
MossSMResults from the NHS breast screening programme 1990–1993). J Med Screen1995; 2: 186–90.
13.
PaciEEarly indicators of efficacy of breast cancer screening programmes. Results of the Florence district programme. Int J Cancer1990; 46: 198–202.
14.
DoyleTCClinical outcomes of the Otago-Southland breast cancer screening programme1991). N Z Med J1998; 111: 380–3.
15.
JørgensenTMammografiscreening i Københavns Kommune. Ugeskr Læger1996;158:1212–1216.
16.
HirschFRBehandling af primær cancer mammae. Ugeskr Læger1996;158:1218–1221.
17.
TangeUBHirschFRJensenMBOlsenAHBlichert-ToftMRankFEVejborgIMMouridsenHLyngeEMammographic screening in the county of Copenhagen. Clinical consequences of the first three screening rounds. Ugeskr Laeger2002; 164: 1036–1040.
18.
TabarLUpdate of the Swedish two-county program of mammographic screening for breast cancer. Radiol Clin North Am1992;30:187–210.
19.
MillerABBainesCJToTWallCCanadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years. CMAJ1992; 147: 1477–1488.
20.
AutierPShannounFScharpantgenALuxCBackCSeveriGSteilSHansen-KoenigDA breast cancer screening programme operating in a liberal health care system: The Luxembourg Mammography Programme, 1992). Int Cancer2002; 97: 828–832.
21.
TabarLReduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. randomised trial from the breast cancer screening working group of the Swedish national board of health and welfare. Lancet1985; 1: 829–32.
22.
TabarLDuffySWKrusemoUBDetection method, tumour size and node metastases in breast cancers diagnosed during a trial of breast cancer screening. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol1987;23:959–962.
23.
PamiloMAnttinenIRoihaMKallioHTallqvistGSoivaMPaloheimoJKiviluotoHSuramoIMammography screening for breast cancer: First year results from Helsinki and surroundings. Ann Med1989;21:277–279.
24.
TabarLUpdate of the Swedish two-county trial of breast cancer screening: Histologic grade-specific and age-specific results. Swiss Surg1999;5:199–204.
25.
ErnstMFVoogdACCoeberghJWRepelaer Van DrielOJRoukemaJAThe introduction of mammographical screening has had little effect on the trend in breast-conserving surgery: A population-based study in Southeast Netherlands. Eur J Cancer2001;37:2435–2440.
26.
FarwellMFFosterRSJrCostanzaMCBreast cancer and earlier detection efforts. Realized and unrealized impact on stage. Arch Surg1993; 128: 510–513.
27.
JamrozikKByrneMJDewarJMHarveyJMIngramDMParsonsRWWatsonNThe effect of mammographic screening on invasive breast cancer in Western Australia. Med J Aust2000;172:203–206.
28.
OlivottoIAMatesDKanLFungJSamantRBurhenneLJPrognosis, treatment, and recurrence of breast cancer for women attending or not attending the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia. Breast Cancer Res Treat1999;54:73–81.
29.
BorrasJMEspinasJABeemsterboerPMGranadosADe KoningHJAnticipating the consequences for the primary therapy of breast cancer after introducing screening. A more global picture for health care policy making. Int J Technol Assess Health Care1998; 14: 268–276.
30.
De KoningHJBreast cancer screening: Its impact on clinical medicine. Br J Cancer1990;61:292–7.
31.
ErnsterVLBarclayJKerlikowskeKGradyDHendersonCIncidence of and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. JAMA1996;275:913–918.
32.
de KoningHJvan DongenJAvan der MaasPJChanges in use of breast-conserving therapy in years 1978–2000). Br J Cancer1994; 70: 1165–1170.
33.
TangeUBHirschFRJensenMBOlsenAHBlichert-ToftMRankFEVejborgIMMouridsenHLyngeEMammography screening in the county of Copenhagen. Results of the first three screening rounds. Ugeskr Laeger2002; 164: 1048–1052.
34.
EkebergOSkjauffHKåresenRScreening for breast cancer is associated with a low degree of psychological distress. Breast2001;10:20–24.
35.
Von BulowBPsychological reactions connected to screening participation — Illustrated by breast cancer screening. Ugeskr Laeger2002;164:165–167.
36.
Von BulowBPsychological consequences of breast cancer screening among healthy women. Ugeskr Laeger2000;162:1053–1059.
37.
BurmanMLTaplinSHHertaDFElmoreJGEffect of false-positive mammograms on interval breast cancer screening in a health maintenance organization. Ann Intern Med1999;131:1–6.
38.
BoerRWarmerdamPGde KoningHJvan OortmarssenGJExtra incidence caused by mammographic screening. Lancet1994;343:979–979.
39.
ChuKCSmartCRTaroneREAnalysis of breast cancer mortality and stage distribution by age for the Health Insurance Plan clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst1988;80:1125–1132.
40.
TabarLSignificant reduction in advanced breast cancer. Results of the first seven years of mammography screening in Kopparberg, Sweden. Diagn Imaging Clin Med1985; 54: 158–64.
41.
FagerbergGBaldetorpLGrontoftOLundstromBMansonJCNordenskjoldBEffects of repeated mammographic screening on breast cancer stage distribution. Results from a randomised study of 92 934 women in a Swedish county. Acta Radiol Oncol1985; 24: 465–473.
42.
AnderssonIMammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: The Malmö mammographic screening trial. BMJ1988;297:943–8.
43.
FrisellJGlasUHellstromLSomellARandomized mammographic screening for breast cancer in Stockholm. Breast Cancer Res Treat1986;8:45–54.
44.
RobertsMMEdinburgh trial of screening for breast cancer: Mortality at seven years. Lancet1990;335:241–6.
45.
MillerABBainesCJToTWallCCanadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years. CMAJ1992; 147: 1459–1476.
46.
ShapiroSEvidence on screening for breast cancer from a randomized trial. Cancer1977;39:2772–2782.
47.
ColletteCColletteHJFracheboudJSlotboomBJDe WaardFEvaluation of a breast cancer screening programme — The DOM project. Eur J Cancer1992;28A:1985–1988.
48.
HakamaMAggressiveness of screen-detected breast cancers. Lancet1995;345:221–4.
49.
PeerPGAge-specific effectiveness of the Nijmegen population-based breast cancer-screening program: Assessment of early indicators of screening effectiveness. J Natl Cancer Inst1994;86:436–41.
50.
DBCG: DBCG — Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. Reprint. Copenhagen, 1997.