Section 12 of the Norwegian Prisons Act provides for convicted persons to be transferred to a treatment institution as part of the serving of their sentence. In recent years with a growing drugs problem this provision of section 12 of the Prisons Act has been applied to an ever greater extent in the case of inmates with a drug abuse problem. One purpose of transferring inmates to a treatment institution has been to prevent recidivism. The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of serving under section 12 with respect to criminal relapse. We find no preventive effect from serving under section 12 with respect to recidivism.
AmemiyaT. (1973): Regression Analysis When the Dependent Variable is Truncated Normal.EconometricaXLI: 997–1025
2.
AnglinM. D., & HserY. (1990): Treatment of drug abuse. I TonryM., & WilsonJ.Q. (eds.): Drugs and crime.Chicago: Univ. Of Chicago Press
3.
BaileyW. C. (1966): Correctional outcome: an evaluation of 100 reports.Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Sciences57: 153–160.
4.
BestemanK. J. (1990): Federal Leadership in Building the National Drug Treatment System. I GersteinD. R., & HarwoodH. J. (eds.): Treating Drug Problems Volume 2. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press
5.
BuggeK. (1969): Fullbyrdelsen av frihetsstraff i det 18. århundre.Oslo: Universitetsforlaget
6.
ChaikenM.R. (1989): Prison Programs for Drug-Involved Offenders.Washington D.C.: National Institute of Justice Research in Action, U.S. Department of Justice
7.
ClemmerD. (1958): The Prison Community.New York: Rinehart & Company
8.
CoxD. R., & OakesD. (1984): Analysis of Survival Data.London: Chapman & Hall
9.
DeLeonG (1984): Program-based evaluation research in therapeutic communities. I TimsF. M., & LudfordJ. P. (eds.): Drug abuse treatment evaluation: Strategies, progress, and prospects, National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph Series, DHHS Pub. no. (ADM) 86–1329, Rockville, Md.
10.
DoleV, & SingerB. (1979): On the evaluation of treatment for narcotic addiction.Journal of Drug Issues9: 205–211.
11.
EtzioniA. (1984): Moderne organisasjoner.Oslo: Tanum-Norli
12.
FalkinG. P. & WexlerH. K., & LiptonD. S. (1992): Drug Treatment in State Prisons. I GersteinD. R., & HarwoodH. J. (eds.): Treating Drug Problems Volume 2. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press
13.
FieldG. (1992): Oregon prison drug treatment programs. I LeukefeldC. G., & TimsF. M. (eds.) Drug abuse treatment in prisons and jails, ed., National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph no. 118. Rockville, Md.
14.
GendreauP. (1981): Treatment in corrections: Martinson was wrong.Canadian Psychology22: 332–338.
15.
GendreauP., & RossR. R. (1979): Effective correctional treatment: bibliography for cynics.Crime and Delinquency25: 463–489.
16.
GendreauP., & RossR. R. (1983-1984): Correctional treatment. Some recommendations for successful intervention.Juvenile and Family Court Journal34: 31–39.
17.
GendreauP., & RossR. R. (1987): Revivification of rehabilitation: evidence from the 1980s.Justice Quarterly4: 349–407.
18.
GlaserF.B. (1981): Matching in the Real World. A practical Approach. I GottheilE., & McLellanA. T., & DruleyK. A. (eds.): Matching Patients' Needs and Treatment Methods in Alcoholism and Drug Abuse.Springfield, Springfield Ill.: Charles C. Thomas
19.
GreenwoodP. W., & ZimringF.E. (1985): One More Chance: The Pursuit of Promising Intervention Strategies for Chronic Juvenile Offenders.Santa Monica, Calif.: The Rand Corporation
20.
GrevholmE., & KühlhornE. (1997): Behandlingseffekter inom rättsväsendet – en meta-analys av modern nordisk empirisk forskning.Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskabxx: 170–181
21.
HaugeR. (1974): Fra fattigforsorg til kriminalomsorg.Oslo: Universitetsforlaget
22.
InciardiJ.A., & McBrideD.C., & WeinmanB.A. (1993): The assessment and referral of criminal justice clients: Examining the Focused Offender Disposition Program. I InciardiJ.A. (ed.): Drug treatment and criminal justice.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23.
Innstilling fra Straffelovrådet Om Endringer i straffebestemmelsene for overtredelser av regier i lovgivningen om narkotika m.v., avgitt den 16. juni 1967
24.
JudgeG.G., & GriffithsW. E., & HillR. C., & LeeT. C. (1985): The Theory and Practice of Econometrics, New York: John Wiley & Sons
25.
LiptonD., & MartinsonR., & WilksJ. (1975): The Effectiveness of Correctional Treatment, New York: Praeger Publishers
26.
MadduxJ.F. (1988): Clinical experience with civil commitment. I LeukefeldC.G., & TimsF.M. (eds.): Compulsory treatment of drug abuse: Research and clinical practice, NIDA Research Monograph 86, pp. 35–56, Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
27.
MartinsonR. (1974): What works? Questions and answers about prison reform.The Public Interest32: 22–45.
28.
McLellanTA., & ChildressA.R., & GriffithJ., & WoodyG.E. (1984): The Psychiatrically Severe Drug Abuse Patient: Methadone Maintenance or Therapeutic Community?.American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse10: 77–95.
29.
MyersS.Jr. (1983): Estimating the Economic Model of Crime Employment versus Punishment Effects.The Quarterly Journal of EconomicsXCVIII: 157–166
30.
Ot. prp. nr. 46 (1967–68) Om lov om endrede straffebestemmelser for overtredelse av regler i lovgivningen om narkotika m.m.
31.
PalmerT. (1975): Martinson revisited.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency12: 133–152.
32.
SimpsonD. D. (1981): Treatment for drug abuse: follow-up outcomes and length of time spent, for addicts in the DARP followup project.Archives of General Psychiatry38: 875–880.
StreetD. (1965): Inmates in Custodial and Treatment Settings.American Sociological Review30: 40–55.
36.
TittleC. L. (1980): Sanctions and Social Deviance –- The Question of Deterrence.New York: Praeger Special Studies
37.
TobinJ. (1958): Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent Variables.EconometricaXXVI: 24–36
38.
TrumbullW. N. (1989): Estimation of the Economic Model of Crime Using Aggregate and Individual Level Data.Southern Economics Journal56:423–439
39.
VaillantG.E. (1988): What can long-term follow-up teach us about relapse and prevention of relapse in addiction?.British Journal of Addiction83:1147–1157
40.
Van VoorhisP. (1987): Correctional effectiveness: the high cost of ignoring success.Federal Probation51: 56–62.
41.
WexlerH. K., & FalkinG. P., & LiptonD. S., & RosenblumA. B., & GoodloeL. P. (1988): A model prison rehabilitation program: An evaluation of the “Stay'n Out” therapeutic community.New York: Narcotic and Drug Research, Inc.
42.
WheelerS. (1961): Socialization in Correctional Communities.American Sociological Review26: 697–712.
43.
WitteA. D. (1980): Estimating the Economic Model of Crime with Individual Data.The Quarterly Journal of EconomicsXCIV: 57–83.
