Over the past two decades recorded alcohol sales in Norway have increased by almost 50%. Although control policy measures are somewhat weakened over this period, the increase should also be viewed in light of the significant increase in purchase power, implying that alcohol has become relatively cheaper for the consumers. Most of the increase in alcohol sales is due to the more than doubled sales of wine, and the possible importance of wine journalism and bag-in-box wine is discussed in this respect. Despite the significant increase in consumption indicators of alcohol related harms do not show consistently increasing trends. Several possible explanations for this are discussed. Finally the current status of policy initiatives, the public opinion and some future challenges are outlined.
BaborT., & CaetanoR.& CasswellS., & EdwardsG., & GiesbrechtN., & GrahamK., & GrubeJ., & HillL., & HolderH., & HomelR., & LivingstonM., & ÖsterbergE., & RehmJ., & RoomR., & RossowI. (2010): Alcohol: No ordinary commodity. Research and public policy. Second edition.Oxford: Oxford University Press
2.
Edland-GrytM. (ed.)(2009): Alcohol and drugs in Norway 2009.Oslo: Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research
3.
HibellB., & AnderssonB., & BjarnasonT., & KokkeviA., & MorganM., & NaruskA. (1997): The 1995 ESPAD report. The European School Survey Project on Alcohol and Other Drugs. Alcohol and Other Drug Use Among Students in 26 European Countries.Stockholm: The Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and Other Drugs (CAN)
4.
HibellB., & GuttormsenU., & AhlströmS., & BalakirevaO., & BjarnasonT., & KokkeviA., & KrausL. (2009): The 2007 ESPAD report. Substance use among students in 35 countries.Stockholm: Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and other Drugs
5.
HorverakØ. (2008): The transition from over-the-counter to self-service sales of alcoholic beverages in Norwegian monopoly outlets. Implications for sales and customer satisfaction. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs25(2): 77–99
HorverakØ., & ByeE.K. (2007): Det norske drikkemønsteret. En studie basert på intervjudata fra 1973 til 2004 (The Norwegian drinking pattern. A study based on interviews 1970–2004).Oslo: Statens institutt for rusmiddelforskning
8.
LundI. (1997): Alkohol og marked: nye utfordringer i kjølvannet av EØS-avtalen (Alcohol and market: new challenges in the wake of the EEC treaty).Oslo: Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research
9.
MäkeläK., & RoomR., & SingleE., & SulkunenP., & WalshB. (1981): Alcohol, society, and the state. 1. A comparative study of alcohol control.Toronto, Canada: Addiction Research Foundation
10.
NordlundS. (2008): What is alcohol abuse? Changes in Norwegians’ perceptions of drinking practices since the 1960s. Addiction Research and Theory16(1): 85–94
11.
RamstedtM. (2001): Per capita alcohol consumption and liver cirrhosis mortality in 14 European countries.Addiction96 (Suppl 1): S19–33
12.
RiseJ., & NatvigH., & StorvollE.E. (2005): Evaluering av alkoholkampanjen ‘Alvorlig talt’. (Evaluation of the alcohol campaign ‘Seriously speaking’).Oslo: Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research (SIRUS)
13.
RoomR. (2003): Preventing alcohol problems: popular approaches are ineffective, effective approaches are politically impossible. Paper presented at the 13th Alcohol Policy Conference
14.
RoomR. (ed.) (2002): The effects of Nordic alcohol policies. What happens to drinking and harm when alcohol controls change? Helsinki: Nordic Council for Alcohol and Drug Research
15.
RossowI. (2005): Rus og avhengighet – et forsømt tema i undervisningen i helsefagene (alcohol, drugs and dependence – a neglected topic in the education of health professionals). Norwegian Medical Journal125: 54–55
16.
RossowI. (2007): Trends in alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harms in Norway around the turn of the millennium.Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs24 (Suppl.): 61–72
17.
RossowI., & MäkeläP., & ÖsterbergE. (2007): Explanations and implications of concurrent and diverging trends. Alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harm in the Nordic countries in 1990–2005. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs24: 85–95
18.
SingleE., & MorganP., & de LintJ. (eds.) (1981): Alcohol, Society, and the State. 2. The social history of control policy in seven countries.Toronto, Canada: Addiction Research Foundation
SkjælaaenØ. (2009): Kommunenes for-valtning av alkoholloven 2009 (Administration of the Alcohol act by the municipalities 2009).Oslo: Norwegian Institute for Alcohol NAD Drug Research (SIRUS)
21.
SkogO.-J. (1985): The collectivity of drinking cultures: a theory of the distribution of alcohol consumption. British Journal of Addiction80: 83–99
22.
SkogO.-J. (2000): An experimental study of a change from over-the-counter to self-service sales of alcoholic beverages in monopoly outlets. Journal of Studies on Alcohol61: 95–100
StorvollE. E., & RossowI., & RiseJ. (2010): Alkoholpolitikken og opinionen. Endringer i befolkningens holdninger til alkoholpolitikken og oppfatninger om effekten av ulike virkemidler i perioden 2005–2009. (Alcohol policy and public opinion. Changes in attitudes to alcohol policy and perceptions of effectiveness of various policy measures over the period 2005–2009).Oslo: Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research (SIRUS)
25.
ÖrnbergJ. C., & OlafsdottirH. (2008): How to sell alcohol? Nordic alcohol monopoluies in a chaning epoch. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs25(2): 129–153
26.
Østhus, S. (2005): Befolkningens holdninger til alkoholpolitikken. En analyse av sammenhengen mellom alkoholpolitikken og folkemeningen i perioden fra 1962 og fram til i dag. (Attitudes to alcohol policy. An analysis of the association between alcohol policy and public opinion in the period from 1962 and until today).Oslo: Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research (SIRUS).
