BaborT. (2009): Raising the standard: A response to the commentators.Addiction104: 1785–1791
2.
Giesbrecht (2009): “Conficts of interest” and beyond: A commentary on Hilde Pape's ‘School-based programmes that seem to work.Useful research on substance use prevention or suspicious stories of success?’ Nordic Studies in Alcohol and Drugs26: 542–544
3.
GooznerM., & CaplanA., & MorenoJ., & KramerB.S., & BaborT., & HusserW.C. (2009): A common standard for conflict of interest disclosure in addiction journals.Addiction104: 1779–1784
4.
McCambridgeJ. (2007): A case study of publication bias in an influential series of reviews of drug education.Drug and Alcohol Review26: 463–368
5.
McCambridgeJ. (2008): A response to the commentaries: look away now or face up to profound problem of publication bias in drug education research.Drug and Alcohol Review27: 352–356
6.
NatvigH. (2009): Primary prevention of alcohol and drug use in junior high school.Nordic Studies in Alcohol and Drugs26: 536–541
7.
PapeH. (2009): School-based programmes that seem to work.Useful research on substance use prevention or suspicious stories of success? Nordic Studies in Alcohol and Drugs26: 521–535
8.
RingwaltC. (2009): Response to dr. Pape.Nordic Studies in Alcohol and Drugs26: 545–547
9.
RoomR. (2008): Dealing with publication bias: two possible steps forward.Drug and Alcohol Review27: 343–344.