BledsoeCaroline H., & SherinBruce, & GalinskyAdam G., & HeadleyNathalia M., & HeimerCarol A., & KjeldgaardErik, & LindgrenJames T., & MillerJon D., & RoloffMichael E., & UttalDavid H. (2007): Regulating creativity: Research and survival in the IRB iron cage.Northwestern University Law Review101 (2): 593–641
3.
Center for Advanced Study, University of Illinois (2005): The Illinois White Paper: Improving the system for protecting human subjects: Counteracting the IRB “Mission Creep”. [Ref. 15.6.2009. Online: http://www.law.uiuc.edu/conferences/whitepaper/index.html]
4.
HaggertyKevin D. (2004): Ethics creep: Governing social science research in the name of ethics.Qualitative Sociology27 (4): 391–414
5.
PettitPhilip (2002): Instituting a research ethic: Chilling and cautionary tales. In: PettitPhilip: Rules, reasons, and norms: Selected essays, pp. 378–401. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
