DusenburyL., & BranniganR., & FalcoM., & HansenW.B. (2003): A review of research on fidelity of implementation: Implication for drug abuse prevention in school settings.Health Education Research18: 237–256
GandhiA.G., & Murphy-GrahamE., & PetrosinoA., & ChrismerS.S., & WeissC.H. (2007): The devil is in the details. Examining the evidence for “proven” school-based drug abuse prevention programs.Evaluation Review31: 43–74
4.
GormanD. (2005): Defining and operationalizing ‘research-based’ prevention: a critique (with case studies) of the US Department of Education's Safe Disciplined and Drug Free Schools Exemplary Programs.Evaluation and Program Planning, 295–302
5.
NordahlT., & NatvigH., & SamdalO., & Thy-holdtR., & WilhelmsenB.U. (2006): Vurdering av rusprogrammer i skolen. In: NordahlT. & GravrokØ., & KnudsmoenH. & LarsenT.M.B., & RørnesK. (red.): Forebyggende innsatser i skolen, s. 78–119.Oslo: Utdanningsdirektoratet
6.
PapeH., & RossowI., & BaklienB. (2007): Villedende om rusforebygging i skolen.Tidsskrift for den Norske Legeforening127: 1399
7.
RoomR. (1990): Community action and alcohol problems: the demonstration project as unstable mixture. In: GiesbrechtN., & ConolyN., & DennistonR.W. (red.): Research, action and the community, OSAP Prevention Monograph 4.Rockville: Office of Substance Abuse Prevention
8.
WeissC.H., & Murphy-GrahamE. & PetrosinoA., & GandhiA.G. (2008): The fairy godmother – and her warts. Making the dream of evidence-based policy come true.American Journal of Evaluation29: 29–47
9.
WilhelmsenB.U., & LabergJ.C., & KleppK.-I. (1994): Evaluation of two student and teacher involved alcohol prevention programmes.Addiction89: 1157–1165.