FlemingM.F., & MundtM.P., & FrenchM.T., & ManwellL.B., & StauffacherE.A., & BarryK.L. (2000): Benefit-cost analysis of brief physician advice with problem drinkers in primary care settings.Medical Care38:7–18
2.
FlemingM.F., & MundtM.P., & FrenchM.T., & ManwellL.B., & StauffacherE.A., & BarryK.L. (2002): Brief physician advice for problem drinkers: Long-term efficacy and benefit-cost analysis.Alcohol: Clinical and Experimental Research 26:36–43
3.
EdwardsA., & RollnickS. (1997): Outcome studies of brief alcohol intervention in general practice: the problem of lost subjects.Addiction92:1699–1704
4.
HanstenM., & DowneyL., & RosengrenD., & DonovanD. (2000): Relationship between follow-up rates and treatment outcomes in substance abuse research: more is better but when is “enough” enough?Addiction95:1403–16
5.
HeatherN. (1995): Interpreting the evidence on brief interventions for excessive drinkers: the need for caution.Alcohol and Alcoholism30:287–96
6.
RichmondR.L., & AndersonP. (1994): Research in general practice for smokers and excessive drinkers in Australia and the UK. III. Dissemination of interventions.Addiction89:49–62
7.
GomelM.K., & WutzkeS.E., & HardcastleD.M., & LapsleyH., & ReznikR.B. (1998): Cost-effectiveness of strategies to market and train primary health care physicians in brief intervention techniques for hazardous alcohol use.Social Science and Medicine47:203–11
8.
HansenL., & de FineOlivarius N., & BeichA., & BarfodS. (1999): Encouraging GPs to undertake screening and a brief intervention in order to reduce problem drinking: a randomized controlled trial.Family Practice16:551–7
