We examine consumers’ evaluations of identical products at different types of retailers using Amazon’s launch of its fashion division. Drawing on product reviews of brand items carried by Amazon (the general merchandise online retailer) and Macy’s (the traditional fashion-oriented department store), we compare the topics in the reviews as important product attributes of consumer evaluations and examine the effects of these topics on ratings. We show that the product topics mentioned for identical products are generally different between Amazon and Macy’s in terms of their proportions and tone. Also, the different topics discussed at the retailers lead to different ratings, with lower evaluations for Amazon. By demonstrating the significant characteristics of the retailers, we provide managers with insights on developing and maintaining competitive advantages for the general retailer and specialty retailers.
ArnettD. B.LaverieD. A.WilcoxJ. B. (2010). A longitudinal examination of the effects of retailer–manufacturer brand alliances: The role of perceived fit. Journal of Marketing Management, 26(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/02672570903534647
BoushD. M.LokenB. (1991). A process-tracing study of brand extension evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172723
7.
BravoR.IversenN. M.PinaJ. M. (2011). Expansion strategies for online brands goingMarketing Intelligence & Planning, 29(2), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634501111117629
ChuW.ChuW. (1994). Signaling quality by selling through a reputable retailer: An example of renting the reputation of another agent. Marketing Science, 13(2), 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.13.2.177
11.
ChunH. H.ParkC. W.EisingerichA. B.MacInnisD. J. (2015). Strategic benefits of low fit brand extensions: When and why?Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(4), 577–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2014.12.003
12.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13.
EckmanM.DamhorstM. L.KadolphS. J. (1990). Toward a mode of the in-store purchase decision process: Consumer use of criteria for evaluating women’s apparel. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 8(2), 13–22.
HemL. E.IversenN. M.OlsenL. E. (2014). Category characteristics’ effects on brand extension attitudes: A research note. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1589–1594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.10.002
17.
JacobyJ.MazurskyD. (1984). Linking brand and retailer images: Do the potential risks outweigh the potential benefits?Journal of Retailing, 60(2), 105–122.
18.
JainS. P.MathurP.IsaacM. S.MaoH.MaheswaranD. (2023). Brand extension failure and parent brand penalty: The role of implicit theories. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 34,49–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1343
19.
JangS.LiuT.KangJ. H.YangH. (2018). Understanding important hotel attributes from the consumer perspective over time. Australasian Marketing Journal, 26(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2018.02.001
KimC. K.LavackA. M.SmithM. (2001). Consumer evaluation of vertical brand extensions and core brands. Journal of Business Research, 52(3), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00107-1
22.
KingR. A.RacherlaP.BushV. D. (2014). What we know and don’t know about online word-of-mouth: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(3), 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2014.02.001
LokenB.BarsalouL. W.JoinerC. (2008). Categorization theory and research in consumer psychology: Category representation and category-based inference. In HaugtvedtC. P.HerrP. M.KardesF. R. (Eds.), Handbook of consumer psychology (pp. 133–163). Taylor & Francis Group/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
MartinI. M.StewartD. W.MattaS. (2005). Branding strategies, marketing communication, and perceived brand meaning: The transfer of purposive, goal–oriented brand meaning to brand extensions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(3), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070304271197
27.
MartinelliE.De CanioF.MarchiG. (2016). Retail brand extension: The moderating role of product knowledge. In Martínez-LópezF. J.Gázquez-AbedJ. C.GijsbrechtE. (Eds.), Advances in national brand and private label marketing: Third international conference 2016, 1 January 2016, Barcelona, Spain (pp. 53–62). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39946-1_6
28.
MathurP.MalikaM.AgrawalN.MaheswaranD. (2023). The context (in) dependence of low-fit brand extensions. Journal of Marketing, 87(1), 114–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429221076840
Meyers-LevyJ.TyboutA. M. (1989). Schema congruity as a basis for product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1086/209192
ParkC. W.MilbergS.LawsonR. (1991). Evaluation of brand extensions: The role of product feature similarity and brand concept consistency. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(2), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1086/209251
33.
ParkJ. Y.ParkK.DubinskyA. J. (2011). Impact of retailer image on private brand attitude: Halo effect and summary construct. Australian Journal of Psychology, 63(3), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-9536.2011.00015.x
34.
PengC.BijmoltT. H.VölcknerF.ZhaoH. (2023). A meta-analysis of brand extension success: The effects of parent brand equity and extension fit. Journal of Marketing, 87(6), 906–927. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429231164654
RiboldazziS.CaprielloA.MartinD. (2021). Private-label consumer studies: A review and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4), 844–866. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12675
38.
RobertsM. E.StewartB. M.TingleyD. (2019). stm: An R package for structural topic models. Journal of Statistical Software, 91(2), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v091.i02
SimmonsA.KangJ. H. (2018, November5–9). The strengths and weaknesses of Amazon.com and Macy’s as fashion retailers [Conference session]. International Textile and Apparel Association, Cleveland, OH, United States. https://www.iastatedigitalpress.com/itaa/article/id/1275/
