This research provides nuanced insights from a consumer-centric behavioural psychology perspective, by developing a theoretically grounded motivational process model of product evaluation, viewed through a country-of-origin (COO) lens, incorporating the focal constructs of product involvement, product knowledge, consumer ethnocentrism (CET) and antecedents related to wine buying in China. An online survey of 934 consumers across China in a range of 12 tier-1 and tier-2 cities investigates the effects of several independent variables on COO product category evaluation. The findings provide valuable contrasting insights between evaluations of products originating from developed economies (France and Australia) and a transitional economy (China), the home country. We validate a 10-item version of the CETSCALE and apply multiple linear regression (MLR) modelling to test the hypothesised relationships. We further contribute by examining both main and interaction effects of the empirically enhanced model. We conclude that CET, product involvement, product purchase experience and, travel exposure significantly impact COO product evaluations, through actual product purchase experience, while product purchase frequency does not. CET also has a significant mediating effect on product evaluation through both involvement and actual product purchasing experience. Gender has direct effects on CET and product evaluation, as does household income on product evaluation.
AbrahamA.PatroS. (2014). Country-of-origin’ effect and consumer decision-making. Management and Labour Studies, 39(3), 309–318.
2.
AcikdilliG.ZiemnowiczC.BahhouthV. (2018). Consumer ethnocentrism in Turkey: Ours are better than theirs. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 30(1), 45–57.
3.
AlantK.BruwerJ. (2010). Winery visitation sets: Intra-regional spatial movement of wine tourists in branded wine regions. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 22(2), 191–210.
4.
AlbaJ. W.HutchinsonJ. W. (1987). Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4), 411–455.
5.
AlbaJ. W.HutchinsonJ. W. (2000). Knowledge calibration: What consumers know and what they think they know. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(2), 123–156.
6.
BalabanisG.DiamantopolousA.MuellerR.MelewarT. (2001). The impact of nationalism, patriotism and internationalism on consumer ethnocentric tendencies. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(1), 157–175.
7.
BalabanisG.DiamantopoulosA. (2004). Domestic country bias, country-of-origin effects, and consumer ethnocentrism: A multidimensional unfolding approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(1), 80–95.
8.
BalabanisG.SiamagkaN. T. (2022). A meta-analysis of consumer ethnocentrism across 57 countries. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 39, 745–763.
9.
BaumgartnerG.JolibertA. (1978). The perception of foreign products in France. In HuntK. (Ed.), Advances in Consumer Research (pp. 603–605). Association for Consumer Research.
10.
BizumicB. (2019). Effects of the dimensions of ethnocentrism on consumer ethnocentrism: An examination of multiple mediators. International Marketing Review, 36(5), 748–770.
11.
BroderickA. J. (2007). A cross-national study of the individual and national–cultural nomological network of consumer involvement. Psychology and Marketing, 24(4), 343–374.
12.
BruwerJ.BullerC. (2012). Country-of-origin (COO) brand preferences and associated knowledge levels of Japanese wine consumers. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 21(5), 307–316.
13.
BruwerJ.CohenJ. (2019). Restaurants and wine by-the-glass consumption: Motivational process model of risk perception, involvement and information-related behaviour. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 77, 270–280.
14.
BruwerJ.LiE. (2017). Domain-specific market segmentation using a latent class mixture modelling approach and wine-related lifestyle (WRL) algorithm. European Journal of Marketing, 51(9/10), 1552–1576.
15.
ChattalasM.KramerT.TakadaH. (2008). The impact of national stereotypes on the country-of-origin effect: a conceptual framework. International Marketing Review, 25(1), 54–74.
16.
ChristianJ. E.WangD. (2022). Bias behind closed doors: Chinese consumers’ perception of foreign wines. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 21, 1318–1333. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2093
17.
ChryssochoidisG.KrystallisA.PerreasP. (2007). Ethnocentric beliefs and country-of-origin (COO) effect: Impact of country, product and product attributes on Greek consumers’ valuation of food products. European Journal of Marketing, 41(11/12), 1518–1544.
18.
CilingirZ.BasfirinciC. (2014). The impact of consumer ethnocentrism, product involvement, and product knowledge on country of origin effects: An empirical analysis on Turkish consumers’ product evaluation. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 26(4), 284–310.
19.
CohenJ. (1988). Set correlation and contingency tables. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12(4), 425–434.
20.
DholakiaU. M. (2001). A motivational process model of product involvement and consumer risk perception. European Journal of Marketing, 35(11/12), 1340–1362.
21.
DiamantopoulosA.SouchonA. L. (1999). Measuring export information use: Scale development and validation. Journal of Business Research, 46(1), 1–14.
22.
DmitrovicT.VidaI.ReardonJ. (2009). Purchase behavior in favor of domestic products in the West Balkans. International Business Review, 18(5), 523–535.
23.
DouglasS. P.NijssenE. J. (2003). On the use of ‘borrowed’ scales in cross-national research: a cautionary note. International Marketing Review, 20(6), 621–642.
24.
EllisD.CaruanaA. (2018). Consumer wine knowledge: Components and segments. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 30(3), 277–291.
25.
Euromonitor International. (2022). Wine in China, Passport Report. Author.
26.
Fazli-SalehiR.TorresI. M.MadadiR.ZúnigaM. A. (2021). Multicultural advertising: The impact of consumers’ self-concept clarity and materialism on self-brand connection and communal-brand connection. Journal of Business Research, 137, 46–57.
27.
FieldA. (2017). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
28.
FogartyJ. J. (2006). The return to Australian fine wine. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 33(4), 542–561.
29.
GineikieneJ.DiamantopoulosA. (2017). I hate where it comes from but I still buy it: Countervailing influences of animosity and nostalgia. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(8), 992–1008.
30.
GuoX. (2013). Living in a global world: Influence of consumer global orientation on attitudes toward global brands from developed versus emerging countries. Journal of International Marketing, 21(1), 1–22.
31.
Gürhan-CanliZ.MaheswaranD. (2000). Determinants of country-of-origin evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(1), 96–108.
32.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
33.
HenselerJ.RingleC. M.SarstedtM. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.
34.
HsuJ. L.NienH. P. (2008). Who are ethnocentric? Examining consumer ethnocentrism in Chinese societies. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 7(6), 436–447.
35.
HuiM. K.ZhouL. (2002). Linking product evaluations and purchase intention for country-of-origin effects. Journal of Global Marketing, 15(3-4), 95–116.
36.
JainS. K.JainR. (2013). Consumer ethnocentrism and its antecedents: An exploratory study of consumers in India. Asian Journal of Business Research Quarterly, 3(1), 1–18.
37.
KleinJ. G. (2002). Us versus them, or us versus everyone? Delineating consumer aversion to foreign goods. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2), 345–363.
38.
KleinJ. G.EttensonR.KrishnanB. C. (2006). Extending the construct of consumer ethnocentrism: When foreign products are preferred. International Marketing Review, 23(3), 304–321.
39.
KleinJ. G.EttensonR.MorrisM. D. (1998). The animosity model of foreign product purchase: An empirical test in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Marketing, 62(1), 89–100.
40.
KlerckD.SweeneyJ. C. (2007). The effect of knowledge types on consumer-perceived risk and adoption of genetically modified foods. Psychology and Marketing, 24(2), 171–193.
41.
KrystallisA.ChryssochoidisG. (2009). Does the country of origin (COO) of food products influence consumer evaluations? An empirical examination of ham and cheese. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 15(3), 283–303.
42.
KucukemirogluO. (1999). Market segmentation by using consumer lifestyle dimensions and ethnocentrism: An empirical study. European Journal of Marketing, 33(5/6), 470–487.
43.
LeeJ. K.LeeW.-N. (2009). Country-of-origin effects on consumer product evaluation and purchase intention: The role of objective versus subjective knowledge. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 21(2), 137–151.
44.
LeeW.-N.YunT.LeeB.-K. (2005). The role of involvement in country-of-origin effects on product evaluation: Situational and enduring involvement. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 17(2/3), 51–72.
45.
MarillK. A. (2004). Advanced statistics:Linear regression, part II: Multiple linear regression. Academic Emergency Medicine, 11(1), 94–102.
46.
NadeauJ.HeslopL.O’ReillyN.LukP. (2008). Destination in a country image context. Annals of Tourism Research, 35(1), 84–106.
47.
NadiriH.TümerM. (2010). Influence of ethnocentrism on consumers’ intention to buy domestically produced goods: An empirical study in North Cyprus. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11(3), 444–461.
48.
NetemeyerR. G.DurvasulaS.LichtensteinD. R. (1991). A cross-national assessment of the reliability and validity of the CETSCALE. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 320–327.
49.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed., pp. 1–752). McGraw-Hill.
50.
OlsenS. O. (2007). Repurchase loyalty: The role of involvement and satisfaction. Psychology and Marketing, 24(4), 315–341.
51.
OnurI.BruwerJ.LockshinL. (2020). Reducing information asymmetry in the auctioning of non-perishable experience goods: The case of online wine auctions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 54, 1–13.
52.
OrthU. R.FirbasováZ. (2003). The role of consumer ethnocentrism in food product evaluation. Agribusiness, 19(2), 137–153.
53.
ParkJ. E.YoonS. J. (2017). Antecedents of consumer animosity and the role of product involvement on purchase intentions. American Journal of Business, 32(1), 42–57.
54.
PayiniV.RamaprasadB. S.MallyaJ.SanilM.PatwardhanV. (2020). The relationship between food neophobia, domain-specific innovativeness, and food festival revisit intentions. British Food Journal, 122(6), 1849–1868.
55.
PereiraA.HsuC.-C.KunduS. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of ethnocentrism in China, India, and Taiwan. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 15(1), 77–90.
56.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.PodsakoffN. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.
57.
SaffuK.WalkerJ. H. (2005). An assessment of the consumer ethnocentric scale (CETSCALE) in an advanced and transitional country: The case of Canada and Russia. Journal of International Management, 22(4), 556–571.
58.
ShankarmaheshM. N. (2006). Consumer ethnocentrism: An integrative review of its antecedents and consequences. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 23(2), 146–172.
59.
SharmaP. (2015). Consumer ethnocentrism: Reconceptualization and cross-cultural validation. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(3), 381–389.
60.
SharmaS.ShimpT. A.ShinJ. (1995). Consumer ethnocentrism: A test of antecedents and moderators. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(1), 26–37.
61.
ShimpT. A.SharmaS. (1987). Consumer ethnocentrism: Construction and validation of the CETSCALE. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 24(3), 280–289.
62.
SiamagkaN.-T.BalabanisG. (2015). Revisiting Consumer Ethnocentrism: Review, reconceptualization, and empirical testing. Journal of International Marketing, 23(3), 66–86.
63.
SomogyiS.LiE.JohnsonT.BruwerJ.BastianS. (2011). The underlying motivations of Chinese wine consumer behaviour. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 23(4), 473–485.
64.
SouidenN.LadhariR.ChangL. (2018). Chinese perception and willingness to buy Taiwanese brands: The role of ethnocentrism and animosity. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 30(4), 816–836.
SumnerW. G. (1906). Folkways: A study of the sociological importance of usages, manners, customs, mores, and morals. Mentor.
67.
VerleghP. W. J.SteenkampJ.-B. E. M. (1999). A review and meta-analysis of country-of-origin research. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20(5), 521–546.
68.
WangC. L.ChenZ. X. (2004). Consumer ethnocentrism and willingness to buy domestic products in a developing country setting: Testing moderating effects. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 21(6), 391–400.
69.
WeiY.WrightB.WangH.YuC. (2009). An evaluation of the consumer ethnocentric scale (CETSCALE) among Chinese consumers. International Journal of Global Management Studies, 1(1), 18–31.
70.
XueF. (2008). The moderating effects of product involvement on situational brand choice. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25(2), 85–94.
71.
YangR.RamsaranR. R.WibowoS. (2016). A conceptual model for country-of-origin effects. Asia Pacific Journal of Advanced Business and Social Studies, 2(1), 96–116.
72.
ZaichkowskyJ. L. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 341–352.
73.
Zeugner-RothK. P.ŽabkarV.DiamantopoulosA. (2015). Consumer ethnocentrism, national identity, and consumer cosmopolitanism as drivers of consumer behavior: A social identity theory perspective. Journal of International Marketing, 23(2), 25–54.
74.
ZhangY. (1997). Country-of-origin effect: The moderating function of individual difference in information processing. International Marketing Review, 14(4), 266–287.
75.
ZolfagharianM.SaldivarR.BraunJ. (2017). Country of origin and ethnocentrism in the context of lateral, upward and downward migration. International Marketing Review, 34(2), 330–352.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
