The term 'accident' suggests an unexpected or unforeseen happening which afflicts a worker. Historically there has been a tendency to categorise such injuries as aberrant or unusual with a focus upon the individual injured. High injury rates tend to occur in lower socio- economic groups whose perception of causation and work experience place them at odds with management. At the same time injuries are treated, investigated and compensated at an individual leveL This medical and legal individualisation process has served to obscure group susceptibility and group responses to health threat. Further, patterns of behaviour, injuries and overt conflict may be related to the levels of control experienced at work A case study of a large Brisbane factory demonstrated that a conflict of interest was recognised by both workers and management and resulted in tacit acceptance of 'restrictive labour practices', as survival mechanisms. This recognition of inherent danger, injury-avoidance withdrawal and the contradictory nature of control for safety and production, by both sides, is de facto legitimation of occupational injuries being embedded in the social relations of production - rather than being 'accidental'.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (1981/82), Industrial Accidents, Brisbane, Statistics House.
2.
Cruise, H. (1957) ' Some Restrictive Practices in Australia: Their Extent, Effect and Origin', in Productivity and Progress, Australian Institute of Political Science, 23 rd Summer School, Sydney, Angus and Robertson , 299-302.
3.
Dean, A., D. West and W. Wein ( 1982), 'Measuring Loss of Life, Health and Income Due to Disease ', Public Health Reports, 97, 1, 44-7.
4.
Dreitzel, H. (1971), The Social Organisation of Health, New York, Macmillan.
5.
Edwards, P. and H. Scullion (1982), The Social Organisation of Industrial Conflict , Oxford , Basil Blackwell.
6.
Eldridge, J. (1973), 'Industrial Conflict Some Problems of Theory and Method', in J. Child (ed.) Man and Organisation, London, Allen and Unwin
7.
Fitzpatrick, J. (1980), 'Adapting to Danger', Sociology of Work and Occupations, 7, 2, 133-59.
8.
Hill, J. and E. Trist (1962), Industrial Accidents Sickness and Other Absences , London, Tavistock
9.
James, C. (1983), Occupational Injury: An Investigation of the Processes of Definition as it Affects the Reporting of Incidence, Griffith University, School of Social and Industrial Administration, BAdmin. honours thesis, (unpublished).
10.
Kinnersley, P. (1974), The Hazards of Work, London , Pluto Press.
11.
Low, I. ( 1984), 'The Effect of Industrial Relations on Absence Attributed to Injury', Journal of Industrial Relations, 26, 4, 472-83.
12.
Marx, K. (1977), Capital VoL 1, New York, Random House.
13.
Navarro, V. (1982), 'The Labor Process and Health: A Historical Materialist Interpretation', International Journal of Health Services , 12, 1, 17-18.
14.
Nichols, T. and P. Armstrong, (1973), Safety or Profit, Bristol, Falling Wall Press.
15.
Quinlan, M. (1984), 'The Industrial Relations of Occupational Health' , Griffith University, School of Social and Industrial Administration, Occasional Paper No. 45.
16.
Walters, V. (1980), Class Inequality and Health Care, London, Croom Helm.
17.
Webb, E., D. Campbell, R. Schwartz and L. Sechrest (1966), Unobtrusive Measures: Non Reactive Research in the Social Sciences, Chicago, Rand McNally.
18.
Weber, M. (1970), The Protestant Ethic and The Spirit of Capitalism , London, Unwin.
