The present paper reports the results of a study of leaders in Australian science by use of both positional and reputational methods. Preliminary analyses suggested that the two methods yield very similar results. A leadership group within Australian science was identified and a typical profile of the elite scientist based on this data was presented. It remains for future research however to determine the extent of power and influence of this group and whether in fact it constitutes an elite.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amick, D.J.1974. An Index of Scientific Elitism and the Scientist's Mission , Science Studies4, 1-16.
2.
'Birch Report'. 1977. Report of the Independent Inquiry into the CSIRO, Canberra: AGPS.
3.
Blume, S.S.1974. Toward a Sociology of Science, New York: Free Press.
4.
Blume, S.S. and Sinclair, R.1973. Chemists in British Universities: a Study of the Reward System in Science, American Sociological Review, 38, 126-138.
5.
Cole, S. and Cole, J.1973. Social Stratification in Science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
'Coombs Report'. 1976. Report of the Royal Commission on Australian Government Administration, Canberra: AGPS.
7.
Encel, S.1971. The Support of Science without Science Policy in Australia , Minerva, 9, 349-360.
8.
Gaston, J.1973. Originality and Competition in Science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
Giddens, A.1974. Elites in the British Class Structure, Stanworth, P. and Giddens, A. (eds), Elites and Power in British SocietyLondon: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Gummett, P.1980. Scientists in Whitehall, Manchester University Press.
11.
Hagstrom, W.1965. The Scientific Community, New York : Basic Books.
12.
Halsey, A.H. and Trow, M.1971. The British Academics, London: Faber & Faber.
13.
Higley, J., Deacon, D. and Smart, D.1979. Elites in Australia, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
14.
Kadushin, C.1968. Power, Influence and Social Circles: a New Methodology for Studying Opinion Makers, American Sociological Review , 33, 685-699.
15.
Lapp, R.1965. The New Priesthood: The Scientific Elite and the Uses of Power, New York: Harper & Row.
16.
Latour, B. and Woolgar, S.1979. Laboratory Life, London: Sage.
17.
Merton, R.K.1973. The Sociology of Science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
Mintz, B. et al. 1976. Problems of Proof in Elite Research, Social Problems, 23, 314-324.
19.
Mokken, R.J. and Stokman, F.N.1976. Power and Influence on Political Phenomena in Barry, B. (ed). Power and Political Theory , London: Wiley.
20.
Moyal, A.M.1975. The Australian Atomic Energy Commission: A Case Study in Australian Science and Government, Search, 6, 365-384.
21.
Moyal, A.M.1980a. 1980b. The Australian Academy of Science: the Anatomy of a Scientific Elite, Parts I and II, Search , 11, 231-239; and 281-288.
22.
Mulkay, M.1974. Methodology in the Sociology of Science: Some Reflections on the Study of Radio Astronomy, Social Science Information , 13, 107-119.
23.
Mulkay, M.1976. The Mediating Role of the Scientific Elite, Social Studies of Science, 6, 445-470.
24.
Mullins, N.C.1972. The Structure of an Elite: the Advisory Structure of the US Public Health Service, Science Studies, 2, 3-29.
25.
Peres, L.1974. Science and Technology in Forward, R. (ed) Public Policy in Australia, Melbourne: Cheshire, 212-248.
26.
Ravetz, J.1971. Scientific Knowledge and its Social Problems. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
27.
Ronayne, J.1976. Australia, International Social Science Journal, XXVIII, 1, 48-64.
28.
Smart, D. and Higley, J.1977. Why Not Ask Them? Interviewing Australian Elites about National Power Structure, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 13, 248-253.
29.
Whitley, R.D.1976. Umbrella and Polytheistic Scientific Disciplines and their Elites. Social Studies of Science, 6, 471-497.
30.
Zuckerman, H.1977. Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States . New York: Free Press.
