Recent works have highlighted that exorcism is not an atavistic ritual but that it has a renewed place in our contemporary Western world. As religious institutions have become more secularized and rationalized, a vacuum has been left for religious professionals to deal with demons. While exorcists claim that there is a higher demand for exorcism, they grow as a profession and warn people of the devil's presence in games, popular culture and family curses. The use of social media has not been left out from these developments as exorcism videos have spread, and remote online forms of exorcism are available. While questions of morality are malleable in this context, for example, giving a sense of security or providing extra insecurity in this world of anxiety, this article points to an attempt by an exorcist on his YouTube channel at re-sacralizing society. This article discovers as part of these practices the importance of passing on messages of morality more so than curing peoples of their demons. The digital world thus provides a greater reach for exorcists to spread their morality with a far wider reach than in a darkly romanticized gothic and secluded room where exorcism is often perceived to take place.
BindiS.Giménez BéliveauV. (2022). Exorcisms, extraction of unwanted entities, and other spiritual struggles around the body. A comparative perspective. Social Compass, 69(4), 443–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/00377686221147797
5.
BourguignonE. (2003). Faith, healing and “ecstasy deprivation”: Secular society in a new age of anxiety. Anthropology of Consciousness, 14(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1525/ac.2003.14.1.1
6.
BourguignonE. (2004). Suffering and healing, subordination and power: Women and possession trance. Ethos (Berkeley, Calif ), 32(4), 557–574. https://doi.org/10.1525/eth.2004.32.4.557
CowanD. (2008). Sacred terror: Religion and horror on the silver screen. Baylord University Press.
9.
CuneoM. (1998). Of demons and Hollywood: Exorcism in American culture. Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses, 27(4), 455–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/000842989802700407
10.
CuneoM. (2001) American exorcism: Expelling demons in the land of plenty. Doubleday.
FisherJ.LeonardiC. (2021). Insecurity and the invisible: The challenge of spiritual (in)security. Security Dialogue, 52(5), 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010620973540
13.
Frahm-ArpM. (2021). The practice of confession and absolution as an agent of change in a prophetic Pentecostal Church during COVID-19. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 77(3). https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i3.6560
14.
GiordanG.PossamaiA. (2018). Sociology of exorcism in late modernity. Palgrave McMillan.
15.
GiordanG.PossamaiA. eds. (2020). The social scientific study of exorcism. Springer.
16.
GoodmanF. (1988). How about demons? Possession and exorcism in the modern world. Indiana University Press.
GunnJ. (2009). The rhetoric of exorcism: George W. Bush and the return of political demonology. Western Journal of Communication, 68(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570310409374786
19.
HuntS. (1998). Managing the demonic: Some aspects of the neo-Pentecostal deliverance ministry. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 13(2), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537909808580831
20.
HuxleyA. (1971) The devils of Loudun. Penguin.
21.
JacksonF. (2022). Bedeviling Bob: Pranking “talk back with Bob Larson”. In Kier-LaJ.CorupeP. (Eds.), Satanic panic. Pop-cultural paranoia in the 1980s (pp. 247–262). FAB Press edition.
22.
KapfererB. (1979). Mind, self, and other in demonic illness: The negation and reconstruction of self. American Ethnologist, 6(1), 110–133. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1979.6.1.02a00080
23.
KlaverM. (2015a). Pentecostal pastorpreneurs and the global circulation of authoritative aesthetic styles. Culture and Religion, 16(2), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/14755610.2015.1058527
24.
KlaverM. (2015b). Media technology creating “sermonic events.” The Hillsong megachurch network. CrossCurrents, 65(4), 422–433. https://doi.org/10.1353/cro.2015.a783419
LopezosaC.Orduna-MaleaE.Pérez-MontoroM. (2020). Making video news visible: Identifying the optimization strategies of the cybermedia on YouTube using web metrics. Journalism Practice, 14(4), 465–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2019.1628657
36.
MateoJ. L. D. (2015). “Spirits are like microbes”: Islamic revival and the definition of morality in Moroccan exorcism. Contemporary Islam, 9(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-014-0312-0
37.
ObadiaL. (2020). Moral and financial economics of ‘digital magic’: Explorations of an opening field. Social Compass, 67(4), 534–552. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768620950237
38.
O’DonnellJ. (2021). Passing orders: Demonology and sovereignty in American spiritual welfare. Fordham University Press.
39.
OpenshawK.PossamaiA. (2024). Megachurches, Social Media and Pop Culture. In AdogameA.BaumanC.ParsitauD.YipJ. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of megachurches (pp. 441–452). Routledge.
40.
PetersenJ. A. (2012). From book to bit: Enacting satanism online. In GranholmK.AspremE. (Eds.), Contemporary esotericism (pp. 134–158). Equinox.
41.
Possamai-InesedyA.NixonA. (2019). The digital social: Religion and belief. Walter de Gruyter.
42.
PossamaiA.TittensorD. (2021). Religion and change in Australia. Routledge.
43.
RochaC.VokesR.OpenshawK. (2021) “Can the Holy Spirit Be Livestreamed?” What worshipping online during the COVID-19 pandemic has meant to African Australians” Sapiens. Magazine published on April 6, 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2021, from https://www.spaiens.org/culture/worshipping-online-covid-19/
