This article critically engages with the Australian Cultural Fields project and the book Fields, Capitals, Habitus to make suggestions as to what future research on consumption practices needs to consider, including the place of young people; increased material inequality and its implications for cultural production; the development of consumers participating in cultural production; and the importance of considering emotions and affect in Bourdieusian sociology.
AdkinsL.CooperM.KoningsM. (2020). The asset economy: Property ownership and the new logic of inequality. Polity Press.
2.
AlkovskaA. (2022). The wageless life of creative workers: Alternative economic practices, commoning and consumption work in cultural labour. Sociology, 56(4), 673–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385211056011
3.
ArundelR.RonaldR. (2021). The false promise of homeownership: Homeowner societies in an era of declining access and rising inequality. Urban Studies, 58(6), 1120–1140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019895227
4.
AttfieldS. (2020). The working class in the Australian mainstream media. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 16(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1386/macp_00014_1
5.
BakerS.BennettA.TaylorJ. (Eds.). (2013). Redefining mainstream popular music. Routledge.
6.
BennettT., Carter, D., Gayo, M., Kelly, M., & Noble, G. (2021). Fields, capitals, habitus: Australian culture, inequalities and social divisions. Routledge.
7.
BennettT.DibleyB.GayoM. (2021). The mark of time: Temp[orality and the dynamics of distinction in the music field. In BennettT.CarterD.GayoM.KellyM.NobleG. (Eds.), Fields, capitals, habitus: Australian culture, inequalities and social divisions (pp. 49–63). Routledge.
8.
BennettT.EmmisonM.FrowM. (1999). Accounting for tastes: Australian everyday cultures. Cambridge University Press.
9.
BennettT.GayoM.PertierraA.C. (2021). The Australian spaces of lifestyles. In BennettT.CarterD.GayoM.KellyM.NobleG. (Eds.), Fields, capitals, habitus: Australian culture, inequalities and social divisions (pp. 119–146). Routledge.
10.
BennettT.GayoM.RoweD.TurnerG. (2021). Television: The dynamics of a field in transition. In BennettT.CarterD.GayoM.KellyM.NobleG. (Eds.), Fields, capitals, habitus: Australian culture, inequalities and social divisions (pp. 83–99). Routledge.
11.
BourdieuP. (1984). Distinction. Harvard University Press.
12.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ.G. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.
13.
BourdieuP. (1988). Homo Academicus. Polity Press.
14.
Bourdieu, P. (1990) The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
15.
BourdieuP. (1993). Public opinion does not exist. In Sociology in question. Sage.
16.
ChunW.H.K. (2016). Updating to remain the same: Habitual new media. MIT Press.
17.
CittonY. (2017). The ecology of attention. Polity Press.
18.
DaenekindtS.,RooseH. (2017). Ways of preferring: Distinction through the ‘what’ and the ‘how’ of cultural consumption. Journal of Consumer Culture, 17(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540514553715
19.
EikhofD.R.WarhurstC. (2013). The promised land? Why social inequalities are systemic in the creative industries. Employee Relations, 35(5), 495–508. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-08-2012-0061
20.
GayoM.BennettT. (2021). Class and cultural capital in Australia. In BennettT.CarterD.GayoM.KellyM.NobleG. (Eds.), Fields, capitals, habitus: Australian culture, inequalities and social divisions (pp. 147–168). Routledge.
21.
GerrardJ.ThreadgoldS. (2022). Class in Australia: Public debates and research directions in a settler colony. In ThreadgoldS.GerrardJ. (Eds.), Class in Australia (pp. 3–22). Monash University Press.
22.
HadleyS.HeidelbergB.BelfioreE. (2022). Reflexivity and the perpetuation of inequality in the cultural sector: Half awake in a fake empire?Journal for Cultural Research, Online early.https://doi.org/10.1080/14797585.2022.2111220
23.
HighmoreB. (2010). Bitter after taste: Affect, food and social aesthesis. In GreggM.SeigworthG. (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 118–137). Duke University Press.
IdrissS. (2018). Young migrant identities: Creativity and masculinity. Routledge.
26.
LeeM.MartinT.RavuloJ.SimandjuntakR. (2022). [Dr]illing in the name of: The criminalisation of Sydney drill group ONEFOUR. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, Online early.https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2022.2100131
27.
LuckmanS.AndersonH.SinhaR.RentschlerR.ChalklenC. (2020). ‘The devil is in the level’: Understanding inequality in Australia’s film, TV and radio industries. Media International Australia, 176(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X19892772
NobleG. (2021). Cultural diversity and the ethnoscapes of taste in Australia. In BennettT.CarterD.GayoM.KellyM.NobleG. (Eds.), Fields, capitals, habitus: Australian culture, inequalities and social divisions (pp. 247–264). Routledge.
30.
PertierraA.C.TurnerG. (2021). Cultural participation and belonging. In BennettT.CarterD.GayoM.KellyM.NobleG. (Eds.), Fields, capitals, habitus: Australian culture, inequalities and social divisions (pp. 280–264). Routledge.
31.
PhillipsW. (2015). This is why we can’t have nice things: Mapping the relationship between online trolling and mainstream culture. MIT Press.
32.
PikettyT. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Harvard University Press.
33.
SkeggsB.ThuminN.WoodH. (2008). ‘Oh goodness, I am watching reality TV’: How methods make class in audience research. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 11(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549407084961
34.
SzrederK. (2021). The ABC of the projectariat: Living and working in a precarious art world. Manchester University Press.
35.
TaylorS.LuckmanS. (2020). Creative aspiration and the betrayal of promise? The experience of new creative workers. In TaylorS.LuckmanS. (Eds.), Pathways into creative working lives (pp. 1–27). Palgrave Macmillan.
36.
ThreadgoldS. (2018a). Creativity, precarity and illusio: DIY cultures and ‘choosing poverty’. Cultural Sociology, 12(2), 156–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975517722475
37.
ThreadgoldS. (2018b). Youth, class and everyday struggles. Routledge.
38.
ThreadgoldS. (2019). Bourdieu is not a determinist: Illusio, aspiration, reflexivity and affect. In StahlG.WallaceD.BurkeC.ThreadgoldS. (Eds.), International perspectives on theorizing aspiration (pp. 36–50). Bloomsbury.
