Victims, criminals, and survivors – these are dominant ways in which the media portrays communities affected by disasters. These portrayals are not benign. They present a deficient form of citizenship that reduces communities to disempowered subjects whose agency can only be realised with humanitarian responses or disciplinary action by the state. In this article, we make a case for portraying disaster-affected communities as political agents who assert their status as co-equal citizens bearing ideas and grievances, capable of justifying their views, and have a stake in shaping the course of post-disaster response. We argue that this portrayal is not only normatively desirable but politically possible. We draw on the case of People Surge – a grassroots alliance formed in the Philippines in 2013 in the aftermath of the world’s strongest storm.
AdamsV. (2013) Markets of Sorrow, Labours of Faith: New Orleans in the Wake of Katrina. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
2.
AndreiA.ElsonS.B.ZarrellaG. (2015) Language and Emotion in Philippine Twitter Use during Typhoon Haiyan. MITRE Technical Report. Mclean, VA: MITRE.
3.
BartonA.H. (1969) Communities in Disaster: A Sociological Analysis of Collective Stress Situations. Garden City, NY: Doubleday and Co., Inc.
4.
BautistaJ. (2015) Ritual Crucifiction and Self-mortification in the Catholic Philippines. London: Routledge.
5.
BennettR.KottaszR. (2000) ‘Emergency Fund-raising for Disaster Relief’, Disaster Prevention and Management9(5): 352–60, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/09653560010361393
6.
BeresfordP.CroftS. (1995) ‘It’s Our Problem Too! Challenging the Exclusion of Poor People from Poverty Discourse’, Critical Social Policy15(44–45): 75–95, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/026101839501504405
7.
BergerD. (2009) ‘Constructing Crime, Framing Disaster: Routines of Criminalization and Crisis in Hurricane Katrina’, Punishment and Society11(4): 491–510, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474509341139
CareyJ.W. (2011) ‘American Journalism On, Before, and After September 11’, pp. 71–90 in ZelizerB.AllanS. (eds) Journalism after September 11. London: Routledge.
11.
ChouliarakiL. (2013) The Ironic Spectator: Solidarity in the Age of Post-Humanitarianism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
12.
ClarkeL.ChessC. (2008) ‘Elite and Panic: More to Fear than Fear Itself’, Social Forces87(2): 993–1014.
13.
ClaudioL.E. (2014) ‘From Scandalous Politics to Public Scandal: Corruption, Media, and the Collapse of the Estrada Regime in the Philippines’, Asian Politics and Policy6(4): 539–54, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/aspp.12138
14.
CottleS. (2014) ‘Rethinking Media and Disasters in a Global Age: What’s Changed and Why It Matters’, Media, War & Conflict7(1): 3–22.
15.
CoxR.S.LongB.C.JonesM.I.HandlerR.J. (2008) ‘Sequestering of Suffering: Critical Discourse Analysis of Natural Disaster Media Coverage’, Journal of Health Psychology13(4): 469–80, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105308088518
16.
CuratoN. (2017) ‘“We Haven’t Even Buried the Dead Yet”: Ethics of Discursive Contestation in a Crisis Situation’, Current Sociology65(7): 1010–30.
17.
CuratoN.OngJ.C.LongboanK. (2016) ‘Protest as Interruption of Disaster Imaginary’, pp. 77–96 in RoviscoM.OngJ.C. (eds) Taking the Square: Mediated Dissent and Occupations of the Public Space. London: Rowman and Littlefield.
18.
DavidC.C.OngJ.C.LegaraE.F.T. (2016) ‘Tweeting Supertyphoon Haiyan: Evolving Functions of Twitter during and after a Disaster Event’, Plos One11(3): e0150190.
19.
DruryJ.CockingC.ReicherS. (2009) ‘The Nature of Collective Resilience: Survivor Reactions to the 2005 London Bombings’, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters27(3): 66–95.
20.
FassinD.VasquezP. (2005) ‘Humanitarian Exception as the Rule: The Political Theology of the 1999 Tragedia in Venezuela’, American Ethnologist32(3): 389–405, doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.2005.32.3.389
21.
GoltzJ.D. (1984) ‘Are the News Media Responsible for the Disaster Myths? A Content Analysis of Emergency Response Imagery’, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters2(3): 345–68.
22.
HendriksC.DuusS.ErcanS. (2016) ‘Performing Politics on Social Media: The Dramaturgy of an Environmental Controversy on Facebook’, Environmental Politics25(6): 1102–25, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2016.1196967
23.
KapoorI. (2013) Celebrity Humanitarianism: The Ideology of Global Charity. London: Routledge.
24.
LamchekJ.S.SanchezE.M. (2020) ‘Friends and Foes: Human Rights, the Philippine Left and Duterte, 2016–2017’, Asian Studies Review, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2020.1828273
NussbaumM.C. (2001) Upheavals of Thoughts: The Intelligence of the Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Oliver-SmithA. (1999) ‘The Brotherhood of Pain: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives on Post-disaster Solidarity’, pp. 156–72 in Oliver-SmithA.HoffmanS.M. (eds) The Angry Earth: Disaster in Anthropological Perspective. Abingdon: Routledge.
30.
OngJ.C. (2015) The Poverty of Television: The Mediation of Suffering in Class-divided Philippines. London: Anthem Press.
31.
PanttiM.TikkaM. (2014) ‘Cosmopolitan Empathy and User-generated Disaster Appeal Videos of YouTube’, pp. 178–92 in BenskiT.FisherE. (eds) Internet and Emotions. New York: Routledge.
32.
PloughmanP. (1997) ‘Disasters, the Media and Social Structures: A Typology of Credibility Hierarchy Persistence Based on Newspaper Coverage of the Love Canal and Six Other Disasters’, Disasters21(2): 118–37, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7717.00049
PorteriaA. (2015) ‘Making Money Out of People’s Misery: Has Disaster Capitalism Taken Over Post-Haiyan Philippines?’, Philippine Sociological Review63(S1): 179–206.
SiddiqiA. (2018) ‘“Disaster Citizenship”: An Emerging Framework for Understanding the Depth of Digital Citizenship in Pakistan’, Contemporary South Asia26(2): 157–74, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09584935.2017.1407294
The Sphere Project (2004) The Sphere Handbook: Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Humanitarian Response, URL (consulted 4 July 2020): http://www.ifrc.org/docs/idrl/I1027EN.pdf
39.
TademT.S.E. (2019) ‘The Middle-class-led Left Movement in Civil Society’s Role in the Philippines’ Democratization Process’, pp. 81–101 in HsiaoH.H.M. (ed.) Middle Class, Civil Society and Democracy in Asia. Routledge Contemporary Asia Series. New York: Routledge
40.
TakahashiB.TandocE.C.CarmichaelC. (2015) ‘Communicating on Twitter during a Disaster: An Analysis of Tweets during Typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines’, Computers in Human Behaviour50: 392–8, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.020
41.
TierneyK.BevcC.KuligowskiE. (2006) ‘Metaphors Matter: Disaster Myths, Media Frames, and Their Consequences in Hurricane Katrina’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science604(1): 57–81, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716205285589
42.
TwiggJ.MoselI. (2017) ‘Emergent Groups and Spontaneous Volunteers in Urban Disaster Response’, Environment and Urbanization29(2): 443–58, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247817721413
YeeD.K.P. (2016) ‘Staking the Claim to the Post-disaster City: An Ethnographic Account of a Post-disaster Social Movement in Tacloban City, Philippines’, paper presented at the conference on Disaster Justice in Anthropocene Asia and the Pacific at the Asia Research Institute, National University of Singapore, 17–18 November.
47.
YeeD.K.P. (2019) ‘Post-political Planning and Insurgent Mobilisation in the Post-disaster City: The Experience of Tacloban City, Philippines, after Typhoon Haiyan’, pp. 152–72 in Lam-KnottS.ConnollyHoK.C. (eds) Post-politics and Civil Society in Asian Cities: Spaces of Depoliticisation. Abingdon: Routledge.
