Does widespread civic participation lead to more social capital? We argue that this is not necessarily the case. As more actors join voluntary associations, the pool of social resources available to non-active individuals is diluted, which can make it difficult for them to accrue social capital. We hypothesize that there is an insider/outsider effect, whereby widespread civic participation increases the risk that non-participants will be excluded from communal life. Using survey data from the German Freiwilligensurvey (German Volunteer Survey 1999–2014) and multi-level regressions, we examine the link between regional civic participation and individual social capital. Our findings reveal that civic participation rates on the macro level affect participants’ and non-participants’ friendship and support networks differently. While high macro-level participation is associated with more friendships and a higher expectation of receiving support for participants, it is also associated with fewer friendships and a lower expectation of receiving support for non-participants.
BabchukN.EdwardsJ. (1965) ‘Voluntary Associations and the Integration Hypothesis’, Sociological Inquiry35: 149–62.
2.
BauerD.J.CurranP.J. (2005) ‘Probing Interactions in Fixed and Multilevel Regression: Inferential and Graphical Techniques’, Multivariate Behavioral Research40: 373–400.
3.
BentonR. (2016) ‘Uniters or Dividers? Voluntary Organizations and Social Capital Acquisition’, Social Networks44: 209–18, doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2015.09.002.
4.
BeugelsdijkS.van SchaikT.ArtsW. (2006) ‘Toward a Unified Europe? Explaining Regional Differences in Value Patterns by Economic Development, Cultural Heritage and Historical Shocks’, Regional Studies40(3): 317–27.
5.
BorgattiS.P. (1998) ‘SOCNET Discussion of the Origins of Social Capital’, Connections21(2).
6.
BourdieuP. (1986) ‘The Forms of Capital’, pp. 241–58 in J.G. Richardson (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press.
7.
BradleyE. (1995) ‘Religious Involvement and Social Resources: Evidence from the Data Set “Americans’ Changing Lives”’, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion34: 259–67, doi: 10.2307/1386771.
8.
BurtR.S. (2000) ‘Structural Holes versus Network Closure as Social Capital’, chapter 2 in R. Dubos, K. Cook and R.S. Burt (eds) Social Capital: Theory and Research. Taylor & Francis Group
9.
ColemanJ.S. (1988) ‘Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital’, American Journal of Sociology94: S95–S120.
10.
CharronN.LapuenteV. (2013) ‘Why Do Some Regions in Europe Have a Higher Quality of Government?’, Journal of Politics75: 567–82.
CurrariniS.JacksonM.O.PinP. (2009) ‘An Economic Model of Friendship: Homophily, Minorities, and Segregation’, Econometrica77: 1003–45, doi: 10.3982/ECTA7528.
13.
DavidsonT.SanyalP. (2017) ‘Associational Participation and Network Expansion: Microcredit Self-help Groups and Poor Women’s Social Ties in Rural India’, Social Forces95: 1695–24, doi: 10.1093/sf/sox021.
14.
DeciE.L.KoestnerR.RyanA.M. (1999) ‘A Meta-analytic Review of Experiments Examining the Effects of Extrinsic Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation’, Psychological Bulletin125: 627–68.
15.
de TocquevilleAlexis (2019 [1840]) De la démocratie en Amérique, Tome I et II of Oeuvres complètes. Paris: independently published.
16.
DikaS.L.SinghK. (2002) ‘Applications of Social Capital in Educational Literature: A Critical Synthesis’, Review of Educational Research72: 31–60.
17.
DunbarR. (1992) ‘Neocortex Size as a Constraint on Group Size in Primates’, Journal of Human Evolution22: 469–93, doi: 10.1016/0047-2484(92)90081-J.
18.
EllisonC.GeorgeL.K. (1994) ‘Religious Involvement, Social Ties, and Social Support in a Southeastern Community’, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion33: 46–61, doi: 10.2307/1386636.
19.
FeldS.L. (1982) ‘Social Structural Determinants of Similarity among Associates’, American Sociological Review47: 797–801, doi: 10.2307/2095216.
20.
FestingerL. (1950) ‘Informal Social Communication’, Psychological Review57: 271–82, doi: 10.1037/h0056932.
21.
FischerC.S. (1975) ‘Toward a Subcultural Theory of Urbanism’, American Journal of Sociology80: 1319–1341.
22.
FischerC.S. (1977) Networks and Places: Social Relations in the Urban Setting. New York: The Free Press.
23.
FischerC.S. (1982) To Dwell among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
FonsecaX.LukoschS.BrazierF. (2019) ‘Social Cohesion Revisited: A New Definition and How to Characterize It’, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research32(2): 231–53, doi: 10.1080/13511610.2018.1497480
25.
GabrielO. (2001) Sozialkapital und Demokratie. Zivilgesellschaftliche Ressourcen im Vergleich. Wien: WUV.
26.
GlanvilleJ.L. (2004) ‘Voluntary Associations and Social Network Structure: Why Organizational Location and Type Are Important’, Sociological Forum19(3): 465–91.
27.
HeisigJ.P.SchaefferM. (2019) ‘Why You Should Always Include a Random Slope for the Lower-level Variable Involved in a Cross-level Interaction’, European Sociological Review35(2): 258–279.
28.
HirschleJ. (2014) ‘Consumption as a Source of Social Change’, Social Forces92: 1405–33, doi: 10.1093/sf/sou001.
IshizawaH. (2015) ‘Civic Participation through Volunteerism among Youth across Immigrant Generations’, Sociological Perspectives58: 264–85, doi: 10.1177/0731121414556843.
31.
KaasaA.VadiM.VarblaneU. (2014) ‘Regional Cultural Differences within European Countries: Evidence from Multi-country Surveys’, Management International Review54(6): 825–52.
32.
KleinerT.-M. (2015) ‘Geographische Nähe, Landesgrenze und kulturelle Distanz. Eine Analyse regionaler Dyaden am Beispiel Österreichs’, Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie40: 281–97, doi: 10.1007/s11614-015-0173-7.
33.
KleinerT.-M. (2016) ‘Why We Trust Other Nations: The Role of Cultural Values and Corruption in Generating Transnational Trust’, Comparative Sociology15: 85–111, doi: 10.1163/15691330-12341375.
34.
KleinerT.-M. (2018) ‘Public Opinion Polarization and Protest Behavior’, European Journal of Political Research57: 941–62.
35.
LinN. (1999) ‘Building a Network Theory of Social Capital’, Connections22(1): 28–51.
36.
LinN. (2001) Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Lo IaconoS. (2018) ‘Does Community Social Embeddedness Promote Generalized Trust? An Experimental Test of the Spillover Effect’, Social Science Research73: 126–45, doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.03.001.
38.
LouchH. (2000) ‘Personal Network Integration: Transitivity and Homophily in Strong-tie Relations’, Social Networks22: 45–64, doi: 10.1016/S0378-8733(00)00015-0.
39.
MarsdenP.V. (1987) ‘Core Discussion Networks of Americans’, American Sociological Review52: 122–313.
40.
McPhersonJ.M.Smith-LovinL. (1987) ‘Homophily in Voluntary Organizations: Status Distance and the Composition of Face-to-face Groups’, American Sociological Review52: 370–9, doi: 10.2307/2095356.
41.
McPhersonJ.M.PopielarzP.DrobnicS. (1992) ‘Social Networks and Organizational Dynamics’, American Sociological Review57: 153–70.
42.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.CookJ.M. (2001) ‘Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks’, Annual Review of Sociology27: 415–44, doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415.
43.
MinkovM.HofstedeG. (2012) ‘Is National Culture a Meaningful Concept? Cultural Values Delineate Homogeneous National Clusters of In-country Regions’, Cross-Cultural Research46: 133–59.
44.
MinkovM.HofstedeG. (2014) ‘Clustering of 316 European Regions on Measures of Values: Do Europe’s Countries Have National Cultures?’, Cross-Cultural Research48(2): 144–76.
45.
MollenhorstG.VölkerB.FlapH. (2008) ‘Social Contexts and Personal Relationships: The Effect of Meeting Opportunities on Similarity for Personal Relationships of Different Strength’, Social Networks30: 60–8.
46.
OlsonM. (1982) The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation and Social Rigidities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
47.
PollackD. (2003) Zivilgesellschaft und Staat in der Demokratie. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
48.
PopielarzP.McPhersonJ.M. (1995) ‘On the Edge or In Between: Niche Position, Niche Overlap, and the Duration of Voluntary Memberships’, American Journal of Sociology101: 698–720.
49.
PutnamR.D. (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
50.
PutnamR.D. (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
51.
RoßteutscherS. (2002) ‘Advocate or Reflection? Associations and Political Culture’, Political Studies50: 514–28, doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.00382.
52.
RoßteutscherS. (2008) ‘Undemokratische Assoziationen’, pp. 61–76 in A. Brodocz, M. Llanque and G.S. Schaal (eds) Bedrohungen der Demokratie. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
53.
RoßteutscherS. (2009) ‘Soziale Partizipation und Soziales Kapital’, pp. 163–80 in KainaV.RömmeleA. (eds) Politische Soziologie: Ein Studienbuch. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
54.
RothR. (2003) ‘Die dunklen Seiten der Zivilgesellschaft’, Forschungsjournal Neue Soziale Bewegungen16: 59–73.
55.
SaleminkK.StrijkerD. (2018) ‘The Participation Society and Its Inability to Correct the Failure of Market Players to Deliver Adequate Service Levels in Rural Areas’, Telecommunications Policy42: 757–65.
56.
SchwadelP. (2005) ‘Individual, Congregational, and Denominational Effects on Church Members’ Civic Participation’, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion44: 159–71.
57.
SimonsonJ.VogelC.Tesch-RömerC. (2017) Freiwilliges Engagement in Deutschland. Der Deutsche Freiwilligensurvey 2014. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
58.
SlackT.CopeM.R.JensenL.TickamyerA.R. (2017) ‘Social Embeddedness, Formal Labor Supply, and Participation in Informal Work’, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy37: 248–64.
59.
StolleD. (2003) ‘The Sources of Social Capital’, in HoogheM.StolleD. (eds) Generating Social Capital: Civil Society and Institutions in Comparative Perspective. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 19–42.
60.
StrickerM. (2006) Ehrenamt als soziales Kapital. Partizipation und Professionalität in der Bürgergesellschaft. Duisburg-Essen: Universität Duisburg-Essen.
61.
UitermarkJ. (2015) ‘Longing for Wikitopia: The Study and Politics of Self-organisation’, Urban Studies52: 2301–12, doi: 10.1177/0042098015577334.
62.
Van der MeerJ. (2003) ‘Rain or Fog? An Empirical Examination of Social Capital’s Rainmaker Effects’, in HoogheM.StolleD. (eds) Generating Social Capital: Civil Society and Institutions in Comparative Perspective. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 133–51.
63.
van DethJ. (2010) ‘Participation in Voluntary Associations: Dark Shades in a Sunny World?’, American Behavioral Scientist53: 640–56.
64.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK.BradyH.E. (1995) Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
65.
WarrenM.E. (2001) Democracy and Association. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
66.
WiertzD. (2015) A Bridge Too Far?Volunteering, Voluntary Associations, and Social Cohesion, PhD dissertation. University of Oxford.
67.
WrzusC.HänelM.WagnerJ.NeyerF.J. (2013) ‘Social Network Changes and Life Events across the Life Span: A Meta-analysis’, Psychological Bulletin139: 53–80, doi: 10.1037/a0028601.
68.
WrzusC.WagnerJ.NeyerF.J. (2012) ‘The Interdependence of Horizontal Family Relationships and Friendships Relates to Higher Well-being’, Personal Relationships19: 465–82.
69.
ZimmerA. (1996) Vereine. Basiselement der Demokratie: Eine Analyse aus der Dritte-Sektor-Perspektive. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
