The future of work and employment sociology has been a subject of concern for a number of authors in recent years. Halford and Strangleman, among others, have suggested that work and employment sociology is on the decline, in that it has been disconnected from wider sociology and co-opted by management and business schools. In this article we unpack the debate and look at how it relates to gender and work scholarship. In doing so, we propose that the decline thesis might be overstated. While gender and work sociology has been implicated in the demise of labour process theory, it has also embraced change and strengthened and diversified work and employment sociology. Nevertheless, in this article, we treat the perceived threat as an opportunity to rethink work and employment sociology. We propose a four-themed, interdisciplinary, gender-inspired research paradigm.
BeckU. (2000) The Brave New World of Work. Cambridge: Polity Press.
4.
BaumanZ. (1998) Work, Consumerism and the New Poor. Berkshire: Open University Press.
5.
BaxterJ. (2002) ‘Patterns of Change and Stability in the Gender Division of Household Labour in Australia, 1986–1997’, Journal of Sociology38(4): 399–424.
6.
BaxterJ.HewittB.HaynesM. (2008) ‘Lifecourse Transitions and Housework: Marriage, Parenthood and Time on Housework’, Journal of Marriage and Family70(2): 259–72.
7.
BeckV.BrookP.CarterB.ClarkI.DanfordA.HammerN.et al. (2016) ‘Work Employment and Society Sans Frontières: Extending and Deepening Our Research’, Work, Employment and Society30(2): 211–19.
8.
BourdieuP. (1987) ‘What Makes a Social Class? On the Theoretical and Practical Existence of Groups’, Berkeley Journal of Sociology32: 1–17.
9.
BourdieuP.et al. (1999) The Weight of the World: Social Suffering in Contemporary Society. Cambridge: Polity.
10.
ButlerJ. (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge.
11.
EdwardsP. (2014) ‘The Sociology of Work: From Industrial Sociology to Work, Employment and the Economy’, chapter 22 in HolmwoodJ.et al. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Sociology in Britain. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
ElgerT. (2009) ‘Teaching the Sociology of Work and Employment: Texts and Reflections’, Sociology43(5): 997–1006.
13.
EpsteinC. (1990) ‘The Cultural Perspective and the Study of Work’, in EriksonK.VallasS.P. (eds) The Nature of Work: Sociological Perspectives. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
14.
FriedanB. (1963) The Feminine Mystique. London: Gollancz.
15.
GlucksmannM. (2016) ‘Completing and Complementing: The Work of Consumers in the Division of Labour’, Sociology50(5): 878–95.
16.
GoffmanE. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.
17.
GoodwinJ. (2016) ‘Sociology’s Fate: Intersections of History and (My) Biography’, Sociology50(5): 975–83.
18.
HalfordS.StranglemanT. (2009) ‘In Search of a Sociology of Work: Past, Present and Future’, Sociology43(5): 811–28.
19.
HartmannH. (1979) ‘The Unhappy Marriage Between Marxism and Feminism: Towards a More Progressive Union’, Capital & Class3(2): 1–33.
20.
HebsonG.RuberyJ.GrimshawD. (2015) ‘Rethinking Job Satisfaction in Care Work: Looking beyond the Caring Debates’, Work, Employment and Society29(2): 314–30.
21.
HochschildA. (1983) The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
22.
HochschildA. (2003) The Commercialization of Intimate Life: Notes from Home and Work. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
23.
HollandsR.StanleyL. (2009) ‘Rethinking “Current Crisis” Arguments: Gouldner and the Legacy of Critical Sociology’, Sociological Research Online14(1). Available at: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/14/1/1.html (accessed November 2017).
24.
HuppatzK. (2009) ‘Reworking Bourdieu’s ‘Capital’: Feminine and Female Capitals in the Field of Paid Caring Work’, Sociology43(1): 45–66.
25.
HuppatzK. (2010) ‘Class and Career Choice: Motivations, Aspirations, Identity and Mobility for Women in Paid Caring Work’, Journal of Sociology46(2): 115–32.
26.
HuppatzK. (2012) Gender Capital at Work: Intersections of Femininity, Masculinity, Class and Occupation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
27.
HuppatzK.GoodwinS. (2013) ‘Masculinised Jobs, Feminised Jobs and Men’s “Gender Capital” Experiences: Understanding Occupational Segregation in Australia’, Journal of Sociology9(2–3): 291–308.
28.
KelanE. (2010) ‘Gender Logic and (Un)Doing Gender at Work’, Gender, Work & Organization17(2): 174–94.
29.
McDowellL. (2016) ‘Reflections on Feminist Economic Geography: Talking to Ourselves?’, Environment and Planning48(10): 2093–9.
30.
MeerN.LeonardP.TaylorS.O’ConnorH.OfferJ. (2016) ‘Bringing it “Home”? Sociological Practice and the Practice of Sociology’, Sociology50(5): 835–46.
31.
NelsonJ. (2016) ‘Husbandry: A (Feminist) Reclamation of Masculine Responsibility for Care’, Cambridge Journal of Economics40: 1–15.
32.
NentwichJ.KelanE. (2014) ‘Towards a Typology of “Doing Gender”: An Analysis of Empirical Work and Its Challenges’, Gender, Work & Organization21(2): 121–34.
33.
OakleyA. (1974) The Sociology of Housework. London: Martin Robertson.
34.
ParkerM. (2015) ‘Between Sociology and the Business School: Critical Studies of Work, Employment and Organization in the UK’, Sociological Review63(1): 162–80.
35.
RayL.SayerA. (1999) ‘Introduction’, in Culture and Economy after the Cultural Turn. London: Sage.
36.
Ross-SmithA.HuppatzK. (2010) ‘Management, Women and Gender Capital’, Gender, Work & Organization17(5): 547–66.
37.
SavageM. (2010) ‘Unpicking Sociology’s Misfortunes’, British Journal of Sociology61(4): 659–65.
38.
StonesR. (2017) ‘Political Sociology and Political Theory’, in OuthwaiteW.TurnerS. (eds) Sage Handbook of Political Sociology. London: Sage.
39.
StranglemanT. (2007) ‘The Nostalgia for Permanence at Work? The End of Work and its Commentators’, Sociological Review55(1): 81–103.
40.
ThompsonP.SmithC. (2009) ‘Labour Power and Labour Process: Contesting the Marginality of the Sociology of Work’, Sociology43(5): 912–30.
