Liquid modernity and choice of university degree programmes: Malaysian university students’ perception

Abstract

Education has become increasingly driven by economic forces and it is now seen as a way to advance economic growth and prosperity. This article starts by describing the traditional educational vision and Bauman’s liquid modernity. Later, the higher education scenario in Malaysia will be presented. The objective of this research is to investigate the factors influencing Malaysian students’ university degree choice, and their perspectives on basic science as well as basic social science degree courses in universities. Our findings show the primacy of economic considerations when students make a choice about their education. An examination of the relevance of Bauman’s liquid modernity is also applied here. Moreover, the discrepancies in the research results will be discussed. The article concludes that while liquid modernity promises opportunities and advancement, awareness of the current dynamics in the education sector is also needed.

Keywords

choice of degree programme economic growth liquid modernity Malaysian higher education

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Al-Allak

B.A.

Alnaser

A.S.

Saeed

M.A.

(2011) ‘Education and Globalisation: Conceptual and Visionary Approach’, Advanced Social Research 1: 1–10.

Aronowitz

(2000) The Knowledge Factory: Dismantling the Corporate University and Creating True Higher Learning. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

Bartell

(2003) ‘Internationalization of Universities: A University Cultural-based Framework’, Higher Education 45(1): 43–70.

Bauman

(2000) Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Bauman

(2007) Liquid Times: Living in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Bauman

(2010) Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Bell

(1973) The Coming of the Post-Industrial Society. New York: Basic Books.

Bloom

B. S.

Englehart

M. B.

Furst

E. J.

Hill

W. H.

Krathwohl

D. R.

(1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the classification of educational goals - Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: McKay.

Boulton

K.G.

(2008) What Are Universities For? Amsterdam: League of European Research Universities.

10.

Brown

(2003) ‘The “Third Wave”: Education and the Ideology of Parentocracy’, in A.H. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown and A.S. Wells, Education: Culture, Economy, Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

11.

Chiam

C.C.

Halim

N.A.

Omar

N.A.

(2011) ‘Is Lifelong Learning an Essence to Economic Growth’, paper presented at the International Conference on Lifelong Learning 2011: Transforming Nations through Enculturation of Lifelong Learning, 14–15 November 2011, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

12.

Egger

Falkinger

Grossmann

(2005) ‘International Capital Integration, Educational Choice and Economic Growth’, CESifo Working Paper Series No. 1630. URL (consulted Mar 2013): http://www.cesifo-group.de/ifoHome/publications/working-papers/CESifoWP/CESifoWPdetails?wp_id=14558562

13.

Information and Communication Technologies for Development (2013) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_and_communication_technologies_for_development (retrieved July 9, 2013).

14.

Kok

J.K.

Cheah

P.K.

Ang

S.M.

(2011) ‘The Role of the University: Malaysian Students’ Perceptions’, paper presented at the International Conference on Social Science and Humanity – ICSSH 2011, URL (consulted May 2013): http://www.ipedr.com/vol5/no1/20-H00060.pdf

15.

Kumar

(2003) ‘The Post-modern Condition’, pp. 96–112 in Halsey

A.H.

Lauder

Brown

Wells

A.S.

Education: Culture, Economy, Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

16.

Kwiek

(2000) ‘The Nation-state, Globalization and the Modern Institution of the University’, Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 96: 74–99.

17.

Leydesdorff

(2010) The Knowledge-Based Economy and the Triple Helix Model University of Amsterdam. Amsterdam School of Communications Research, URL (consulted May 2013): http://www.leydesdorff.net/arist09/index.htm

18.

Lieberman

(1989) Privatization and Educational Choice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. URL (consulted 25 February 2012): http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED386816.pdf

19.

Lyotard

(1984) The Postmodern Conditions: A Report on Knowledge, trans. G. Bennington and B. Massumi. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

20.

Macionis

J.J.

Plummer

(2012) Globalization and Culture: Global Melange, 2nd edn. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

21.

Malaysia MOHE (Ministry of Higher Education) (2007) ‘Institutional Pillars: Strengthening the Institutions’, URL (consulted 20 February 2012): http://www.mohe.gov.my/transformasi/images/2_bi.pdf

22.

Malaysia, National Higher Education Research Institute (2010) ‘The State of Penang, Malaysia: Self-Evaluation Report’, OECD Reviews of Higher Education in Regional and City Development, IMHE, 2010, URL (consulted 1 February 2012): http://www.oecd.org/countries/malaysia/45496343.pdf

23.

Malaysian Association of Private Colleges and Universities (MAPCU) (2009) ‘About MAPCU: Roles and Aspirations’, URL (consulted 22 February 2012): http://www.mapcu.com.my/about.htm#roles

24.

Malaysian Budget (2001) Speech by Y.B. Tun Daim Zainuddin, Minister of Finance Malaysia: Introducing the Supply Bill. URL (consulted 21 February 2012): http://www.treasury.gov.my/pdf/budget/bs01.pdf

25.

Malaysian Budget (2010) Speech by Yab Dato Sri Mohd. Razak

Najib Tun Abdul

, Prime Minister and Minister of Finance. Introducing the Supply Bill (2010) in the Dewan Rakyat. URL (consulted 21 February 2012): http://www.lawnet.com.my/lawnetpublic/2010BudgetSpeech.pdf

26.

Malaysian Economic Transformation Programme (2010) URL (consulted 2 February 2012): http://www.pemandu.gov.my/

27.

Marshall

(1920) Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan & Co., Ltd. Retrieved July 9, 2013 from Library of Economics and Liberty at http://www.econlib.org/library/Marshall/marP46.html

28.

Marshall

(2007) ‘Alfred Marshall’s Economic Nationalism’, in Nakano

(eds) Nations and Nationalism 13(1): 57–76.

29.

Newman

J.H.

(1872) Historical Sketches: Rise and Progress of Universities. London. URL (consulted 22 January 2012): http://archive.org/stream/historicalsketch00newmiala#page/n5/mode/2up

30.

Reay

Davies

David

(2001) ‘Choices of Degree or Degrees of Choice? Class, “Race” and the Higher Education Choice Process’, Sociology 35(4): 855–74.

31.

Schimank

Winnes

(2000) ‘Beyond Humboldt? The Relationship between Teaching and Research in European University Systems’, Science and Public Policy 27(6): 397–408.

32.

Sulaiman

Burke

(2009) ‘A Case Analysis of Knowledge Sharing Implementation and Job Searching in Malaysia’, International Journal of Information Management 29(4): 321–5.

33.

Tikhomirov

Maksimova

Telnov

(2009) ‘The Integrated Knowledge Space – the Foundation for Enhancing the Effectiveness of the University’s Innovative Activity’, Informatica Economică 13(4): 5–10. URL (consulted 30 March 2012): http://revistaie.ase.ro/content/52/01%20-%20Tikhomirov.pdf

34.

UNCSTD (1997) ‘Summary of UNCSTD Working Group Report’, in Report of the Working Group on Information Technology and Development, URL (consulted 29 March 2012): http://www.oas.org/usde/idsd/workshops/workshop1pdf/Draft_Priority_Training_Needs_Report_Annex_UNCST_WG%20IT_and_SD.pdf on March 29 2012.

35.

Welch

A.R.

(2010) ‘Globalisation, Post-modernity and the State: Comparative Education Facing the Third Millennium’, Comparative Education 37(4): 475–92.