Is there any difference between the widely discussed ‘pictorial turn’ and the emerging ‘iconic turn’? If so, does it matter? The answers to these questions are positive if we look at the problem from a cultural sociological point of view. It has been observed that the concept of the ‘iconic turn’, coined by a German philosopher Gottfried Boehm, may capture more effectively the sense of life attributed to visual objects than W.J.T. Mitchell’s famous ‘pictorial turn’. This article endorses this conjecture and provides a theoretical context for its justification. It thus contributes to the emerging debate about the paradigm shift in studies of visual culture.
AlexanderJ.C. (2003) The Meanings of Social Life: A Cultural Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
AlexanderJ.C. (2008a) ‘Iconic Experience in Art and Life: Surface/Depth Beginning with Giacometti’s Standing Woman’, Theory, Culture & Society25(5): 1–19.
3.
AlexanderJ.C. (2008b) ‘Iconic Consciousness: The Material Feeling of Meaning’, Environment and Planning26: 782–94.
4.
AlexanderJ.C. (2010) ‘The Celebrity-Icon’, Cultural Sociology4(3): 323–36.
5.
AlexanderJ.C. (2011) ‘Fact-signs and Cultural Sociology: How Meaning Making Liberates Social Imagination’, Thesis Eleven104(1): 87–93.
6.
AlexanderJ.C.GiesenB.MastJ. (eds) (2006) Social Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
AndrewD. (ed.) (1997) The Image in Dispute: Art and Cinema in the Age of Photography. Austin: University of Texas Press.
8.
AppaduraiA. (ed.) (1986) The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Bachmann-MedickD. (2006) Cultural Turns. Neuorientierungen in den Kulturwissenschaften. Hamburg: Rowohlts.
10.
BarthesR. (1985) ‘Rhetoric of the Image’, pp. 32–51 in Image, Music, Text. New York: Hill and Wang.
BartmanskiD. (2012) ‘Iconspicuous revolutions of 1989: Culture and contingency in the making of political icons’, pp. 39–65 in AlexanderJ. C.BartmanskiD.GiesenB. (eds.) Iconic Power. Materiality and Meaning in Social Life. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
13.
BaudrillardJ. (1983) Simulations. New York: Semiotexte.
14.
BeltingH. (2001) Bild-Anthropologie: Entwürfe für eine Bildwissenschaft. Munich: W. Fink.
15.
BeltingH. (2005) ‘Image, Medium, Body: A New Approach to Iconology’, Critical Inquiry31: 302–19.
16.
BoehmG. (1994) Was ist ein Bild?Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
17.
BoehmG. (2001) ‘Repräsentation, Präsentation, Präsenz. Auf den Spuren des Homo Pictor’, pp. 3–17 in BoehmG. (ed.) Homo Pictor. Munich: K.G. Saur.
18.
BredekampH. (2010) Theorie des Bildakts. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
19.
BrennanT.JayM. (eds) (1996) Vision in Context: Historical and Contemporary Prospectives on Sight. London: Routledge.
20.
BurkeE. (1998) A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and the Beautiful. New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
CassirerE. (2000) The Logic of the Cultural Sciences. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22.
ChaneyD. (2000) ‘Contemporary Socioscapes: Books on Visual Culture’, Theory Culture & Society17(6): 111–124.
23.
ConradB. (2011) ‘Ein Streifen Nostalgie’, Die Zeit45: 69–70.
24.
CraveriB. (2006) The Age of Conversation. New York. NYRB.
25.
DebrayR. (2000) Transmitting Culture. New York: Columbia University Press.
26.
DeNoraT. (2006) ‘Visual Culture’, in TurnerB.S. (ed.) The Cambridge Dictionary of Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
DrechselB. (2010) ‘The Berlin Wall from the Visual Perspective: Comments on the Construction of a Political Media Icon’, Visual Communication9(3): 3–24.
28.
DurkheimE. (1995 [1912]) The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: Free Press.
29.
EmmisonM.SmithP. (2000) Researching the Visual. London: Sage.
30.
FriedmanA. (2011) ‘Toward a Sociology of Perception: Sight, Sex, and Gender’, Cultural Sociology5(2): 187–206.
31.
de la FuenteE.WestB. (2008) ‘Cultural Sociology in the Australian Context’, Journal of Sociology44(4): 315–19.
32.
GeimerP. (ed.) (2002) Ordnungen der Sichtbarkeit. Fotografie in Wissenschaft, Kunst und Technologie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
33.
GierstbergF.OosterbaanW. (eds) (2002) The Image Society: Essays on Visual Culture. Rotterdam: Nederlands Foto Instituut.
34.
GombrichE.H. (2000) The Uses of Images: Studies in the Social Function of Art and Visual Communication. London: Phaidon Press.
35.
GouldnerA.W. (1982) The Future of Intellectuals and the Rise of the New Class. New York: Oxford University Press.
36.
GroysB. (2011) ‘The Border between Word and Image’, Theory, Culture & Society28(2): 94–108.
37.
GumbrechtH.U. (2006) ‘Aesthetic Experience in Everyday Worlds: Reclaiming an Unredeemed Utopian Motif’, New Literary History37: 299–318.
38.
HarréR. (2002) ‘Material Objects in Social Worlds’, Theory, Culture & Society19(5–6): 23–33.
39.
HeywoodI.SandywellB. (1999) Interpreting Visual Culture: Explorations in the Hermeneutics of Vision. London: Routledge.
40.
HoltD. (2004) How Brands Become Icons: The Principles of Cultural Branding. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
41.
HoltD. (2006) ‘Jack Daniel’s America: Iconic Brands as Ideological Parasites and Proselytizers’, Journal of Consumer Culture6(3): 355–77.
42.
HowesD. (2005) Empire of the Senses: The Sensual Culture Reader. New York: Berg.
43.
JanssonA. (2002) ‘The Mediatization of Consumption: Towards an Analytical Framework of Image Culture’, Journal of Consumer Culture2(1): 5–31.
44.
JayM. (1994) Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-century French Thought. Berkeley: University of California Press.
45.
KnoblauchH. (2008) ‘The Performance of Knowledge: Pointing and Knowledge in Powerpoint Presentations’, Cultural Sociology2(1): 75–97.
46.
KravetsO.ÖrgeÖ. (2010) ‘Iconic Brands: A Socio-material Story’, Journal of Material Culture15(2): 205–32.
47.
KurasawaF. (2004) ‘Alexander and the Cultural Refounding of American Sociology’, Thesis Eleven79: 53–64.
48.
LakoffG.JohnsonM. (2003) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49.
LatourB. (2007) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
50.
LöwM. (2008) ‘The Constitution of Space: The Structuration of Spaces through the Simultaneity of Effect and Perception’, European Journal of Social Theory11(1): 25–49.
51.
LuryC. (1997) Prosthetic Culture: Photography, Memory and Identity. London: Routledge.
52.
MalinowskiB. (1961 [1922]) Argonauts of Western Pacific. New York: Dutton.
53.
MeadG.H. (1967) Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54.
MessarisP. (1997) Visual Persuasion: The Role of Images in Advertising. London: Sage.
55.
MirzoeffN. (2009) An Introduction to Visual Culture, 2nd edn.London: Routledge.
56.
MitchellW.J.T. (1986) Iconology: Image, Text, Ideology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
57.
MitchellW.J.T. (1995) Picture Theory: Essays on Verbal and Visual Representation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
58.
MitchellW.J.T. (2008) ‘Four Fundamental Concepts of Image Science’, pp. 15–24 in BirnbaumD.GrawI. (eds) Under Pressure: Pictures, Subjects, and the New Spirit of Capitalism. Berlin: Sternberg Press.
59.
MorleyS. (2003) Writing on the Wall: Word and Image in Modern Art. Berkeley: University of California Press.
60.
MoxeyK. (2008) ‘Visual Studies and the Iconic Turn’, Journal of Visual Culture7(2): 131–46.
61.
PanofskyE. (1962) Iconology. Studies in Iconology: Humanistic Themes in the Art of the Renaissance. New York: Harper and Row.
62.
ReineltJ.G.RoachJ.R. (1998) Critical Theory and Performance. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
63.
RicoeurP. (1970). ‘The Model of the Text: Meaningful Action Considered as a Text’, Social Research38: 529–62.
64.
RobinsK. (1996) Into the Image: Culture and Politics in the Field of Vision. London: Routledge.
65.
SadinE. (2007) Times of the Signs. Berlin: Birkhäuser Verlag.
66.
ScottJ.W. (1991) ‘The Evidence of Experience’, Critical Inquiry17(4): 773–97.
67.
ScottL.M. (1994) ‘Images in Advertising: the Need for a Theory of Visual Rhetoric’, Journal of Consumer Research21(2): 252–73.
68.
SeelM. (2007) Die Macht des Erscheinens. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
69.
SeeligT.StahelU. (eds) (2005) The Ecstasy of Things: From the Functional Object to the Fetish in 20th-century Photographs. Göttingen: Steidl.
70.
SeidmanS. (2001) Contested Knowledge: Social Theory in the Postmodern Era, 2nd edn.Malden, MA: Blackwell.
71.
ShustermanR. (2002) Surface and Depth: Dialectics of Criticism and Culture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
72.
SklairL. (2010) ‘Iconic Architecture and the Culture-ideology of Consumerism’, Theory, Culture & Society27(5): 135–59.
73.
SmithJ.JenksC. (2000) Images of Community: Durkheim, Social Systems and the Sociology of Art. Aldershot: Ashgate.
74.
TurnerB.S. (2001) ‘The End(s) of Humanity: Vulnerability and the Metaphors of Membership’, The Hedgehog Review3(2): 7–32.
75.
TurnerV. (1974) Dramas, Fields and Metaphors: Symbolic Action in Human Society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
76.
WhiteH. (1987) The Content of the Form. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
77.
WoganP. (2001) ‘Imagined Communities Reconsidered: Is Print-Capitalism What We Think It Is?’, Anthropological Theory1(4): 403–18.
78.
WoodwardI. (2007) Understanding Material Culture. London: Sage.
