This article draws on data from a study conducted between 2001 and 2005 that investigated university employees’ desires to have children. Forty-seven participants reflected upon key elements of their personal histories, experiences of intimate relationships and what they thought it was possible to achieve in their life worlds. Theories of de-traditionalization and connectedness were considered in the research. Although participants’ intimate relationships were central to their life worlds and there was sometimes anxiety about relationship failure, couples engaged in dynamic processes of accommodation and compromise. Participants who wanted children aspired to committed, fairly traditional relationships in which the practical elements of sharing and caring were emphasized. Functioning family units rather than satisfied individuals were privileged. Participants were deeply embedded in their relational networks – past or present – and these shaped both fertility intentions and outcomes.
ABS (1999) Australian Demographic Statistics: Population Special Article – Lifetime Childlessness. Cat. No. 3101.0, Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
2.
ABS (2002) Australian Social Trends 2002: Family Formation: Trends in Childlessness. Cat. No. 4102.0. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
3.
ABS (2004) Australian Historical Population Statistics. Cat. No. 3105.0.65.001. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
BeckerG.S. (1991) A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
BirrellB.RapsonV.HouriganC. (2004) Men and Women Apart: Partnering in Australia. Melbourne: Australian Family Association and Centre for Population and Urban Research.
11.
BrysonL.StrazzariS.BrownW. (1999) ‘Shaping Families – Women, Control and Contraception’, Family Matters53(winter): 31–8.
12.
CannoldL. (2005) What, No Baby? Freemantle: Curtin University Books.
DuncanS.PhillipsM. (2008) ‘New Families? Tradition and Change in Partnering and Relationships’, in ParkA.CurticeJ.ThomsonK.PhillipsM.JohnsonM.CleryE. (eds) British Social Attitudes 2007/8. London: SAGE.
15.
GabbJ. (2008) Researching Intimacy in Families. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
16.
GiddensA. (1991) Modernity and Self-identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
17.
GiddensA. (1992) The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
18.
GilliesV. (2003) Family and Intimate Relationships: A Review of the Sociological Research. Families and Social Capital ESRC Research GroupWorking Paper No. 2. London: South Bank University.
19.
Gonzalez-LopezM.J. (2002) ‘A Portrait of Western Families’, in CarlinA.DuncanS.EdwardsR. (eds) Analysing Families: Morality and Rationality in Policy and Practice. London: Routledge.
20.
GrossN. (2005) ‘The Detraditionalisation of Intimacy Reconsidered’, Sociological Theory23: 286–311.
21.
HakimC. (2000) Work–Lifestyle Choices in the 21st Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
IrwinS. (1999) Reproductive Regimes: Gender, Generation and Changing Patterns of Fertility. Centre for Research on Family, Kinship and Childhood, Working Paper No. 16. Leeds: University of Leeds.
23.
JamiesonL. (1998) Intimacy. Malden, MA: Polity.
24.
LeeC.GramotnevH. (2006) ‘Motherhood Plans among Young Australian Women: Who Wants Children These Days?’, Journal of Health Psychology11: 15–20.
25.
LesthaegheR. (1998) ‘On Theory Development’, Population and Development Review24: 1–14.
26.
MarsiglioW. (1998) Procreative Man. New York: New York University Press.
27.
McDonaldP. (2000a) ‘Gender Equity, Social Institutions and the Future of Fertility’, Journal of Population Research17: 1–16.
28.
McDonaldP. (2000b) ‘Low Fertility in Australia: Evidence, Causes and Policy Responses’, People and Place8(2): 6–20.
29.
McDonnellE. (2005) ‘Change and Contingency: A Study of Fertility Decision-making over Time’, PhD thesis, RMIT University, Melbourne.
30.
ONS (Office of National Statistics) (2001) Social Focus on Men. London: HMSO.
31.
ONS (Office of National Statistics) (2002) Population Trends 101: Births in 2001 and Conceptions in 2000 in England and Wales. London: HMSO.
32.
ONS (Office of National Statistics) (2005) Birth Statistics: Births and Patterns of Family Building England and Wales, (FM1) Historical Series. London: HMSO.
33.
PerleszA.McNairR. (2004) ‘Lesbian Parenting: Insiders’ Voices’, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy25: 129–40.
34.
PortrieT.HillN.R. (2005) ‘Blended Families: A Critical Review of the Current Research’, Family Journal13(4): 445–51.
35.
ReissmanC.K. (1993) Narrative Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
36.
SmallM.L. (2009) ‘How Many Cases Do I Need? On Science and the Logic of Case Selection in Field-based Research’, Ethnography10(5): 5–38.
37.
SmartC. (2007) Personal Life. Cambridge: Polity.
38.
van de KaaD.J. (1998) Postmodern Fertility Preferences: From Changing Value Orientation to New Behaviour. Canberra: Australian National University.
