Dietitians provide nutritional care in various contexts and it is expected that dietetic subjectivity shapes and is shaped by health/nutrition discourse, but this has not been sufficiently explored. The purpose of this study was to further understand dietetic subjectivity, dietitians’ experiences of their education and relationships between educational and practice discourses. Twelve dietitians were recruited to participate in semi-structured research interviews. Feminist theoretical perspectives informed the research including the interpretation of data, which was analyzed according to the Listening Guide, a feminist voice-centered relational method. A theory of dietitian performativity informed by Butler (1999) emerged whereby dietitians expressed passion and melancholia for their practice. Also, participants experienced discontinuity between educational and practice contexts, which highlighted the need to integrate embodied epistemic perspectives throughout undergraduate education. These findings support a critical gesture in dietetic educational discourse away from positivism towards embodiment as a means for highlighting and reinforcing the complexity and fluidity of dietetic performativity.
Abbott, P., M. Tyler and C. Wallace ( 2005) An Introdcution to Sociology: Feminist Perspectives, 3rd edition. New York: Routledge.
2.
Allen, P. and C. Sachs ( 2007) ‘Women and Food Chains: The Gendered Politics of Food’, International Journal of Sociology of Food and Agriculture15(1): 1-23.
3.
Aphramor, L., Y. Asada, J. Atkins, S. Berenbaum, J. Brady, S. Clarke et al. (2009) ‘Critical Dietetics: A Declaration’, Practice48: 1-2. URL (consulted Sept 2010): http://www.criticaldietetics.org/Critical%20Dietetics%20Declaration.pdf
4.
Atkins, J. and J.R. Gingras(2009) ‘Coming and Going: Dietetic Students’ Experiences of their Education’, Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research70(4): 181-86.
5.
Beasley, C. and C. Bacchi ( 2007) ‘Envisaging a New Politics for an Ethical Future: Beyond Trust, Care and Generosity - Towards an Ethic of "Social Flesh"’ , Feminist Theory8(3): 279-98.
6.
Brown, L.M. and C. Gilligan ( 1992) Meeting at the Crossroads: Women’s Psychology and Girls’ Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
Butler, J. ( 1997) The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
8.
Butler, J. ( 1999) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity . New York: Routledge.
9.
Butler, J. ( 2004) Undoing Gender. New York: Routledge.
10.
Butler, J. ( 2005) Giving an Account of Oneself. New York : Fordham University Press.
11.
Davies, B. ( 2000) A Body of Writing: 1990 - 1999. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
12.
DeVault, M. ( 1999) ‘Whose Science of Food and Health: Narratives of Profession and Activism from Public-Health Nutrition’, pp. 166-83 in A.E. Clarke and V.L. Olesen (eds) Revisioning Women, Health, and Healing: Feminist, Cultural, and Technoscience Perspectives. New York; London: Routledge.
13.
Fletcher, J.K. ( 1999) Disappearing Acts: Gender, Power, and Relational Practice at Work. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
14.
Fox, M. ( 1994). The Reinvention of Work: A New Vision of Livelihood for Our Time. San Francisco, CA: HarperSanFrancisco .
15.
Gilligan, C., R. Spencer, M.K. Weinberg and T. Bertsch ( 2003) ‘On the Listening Guide: A Voice-centered Relational Method’, pp. 157-72 in P.M. Camic, J.E. Rhodes and L. Yardley (eds) Qualitative Research in Psychology: Expanding Perspectives in Methodology and Design. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
16.
Gingras, J.R. and J. Brady ( 2010) ‘Relational Consequences of Dietitians’ Feeding Bodily Difference’, Radical Psychology8(1). URL (consulted Sept 2010): http://www.radicalpsychology.org/vol8-1/gingras.html
17.
Gingras, J.R. ( 2005) ‘Evoking Trust in the Nutrition Counselor: Why should we be Trusted?’, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics18: 57-74.
18.
Gingras, J.R. ( 2008) ‘The Vulnerable Learner: Moving from Middle to Margin in Dietetic Education’, Transformative Dialogues: Teaching and Learning Journal1(3). URL (consulted Sept 2010): http://kwantlen.ca/TD/TD.1.3/TD.1.3_Gingras_Vulnerable_Learner.htm
19.
Gingras, J.R. ( 2009a) Longing for Recognition: The Joys, Contradictions, and Complexities of Practicing Dietetics. York, UK: Raw Nerve Books.
20.
Gingras, J.R. ( 2009b) ‘The Educational (Im)possibility for Dietetics: A Poststructural Discourse Analysis’, Learning Inquiry3(3): 177-91.
21.
Hartrick Doane, G.A. ( 2002) ‘Am I Still Ethical? The Socially-mediated Process of Nurses’ Moral Identity’, Nursing Ethics9(6): 623-35.
22.
Hodges, B. ( 2006) ‘Medical Education and the Maintenance of Incompetence’ , Medical Teacher28(8): 690-96.
23.
Hodges, H.F., A.C. Keeley and E.C. Grier ( 2005) ‘Professional Resiliency, Practice Longevity, and Parse’s Theory for Baccalaureate Education’, Journal of Nursing Education44(12): 548-54.
24.
Kirk, S.F.L., J. Eaton and L. Auty ( 2000) ‘Dietitians and Supervision: Should we be Doing More?’, Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics13: 317-22.
25.
Liquori, T. ( 2001) ‘Food Matters: Changing Dimensions of Science and Practice in the Nutrition Profession’, Journal of Nutrition Education33: 234-46.
26.
Lupton, D. ( 1996) Food, the Body, and the Self. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
Maclellan, D., D. Lordly and J. Gingras (in press) ‘Professional Socialization: An Integrative Review of the Literature and Implications for Dietetic Education. Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research.
28.
Miller, J.B. and I.P. Stiver ( 1994) Movement in Therapy: Honoring the ‘Strategies of Disconnection’. Wellesley, MA: Stone Center Working Paper Series.
29.
Parse, R. ( 1998) The Human Becoming School of Thought: A Perspective for Nurses and Other Health Care Professionals. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
Pettifer, A. and L. Clouder ( 2008) ‘Clinical Supervision: A Means of Promoting Reciprocity between Practitioners and Academics’, Learning in Health and Social Care7(3): 168-77.
31.
Puckett, R.P. ( 1997) ‘Education and the Dietetics Profession’, Journal of the American Dietetic Association97(3): 252-53.
32.
Rapoport, L. and K.N. Perry ( 2000) ‘Do Dietitians Feel that they have had Adequate Training in Behaviour Change Methods?’, Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics13(4): 287-98.
33.
Salih, S. and J. Butler ( 2004) The Judith Butler Reader. Malden, MA : Blackwell Publishing.
34.
Smith, D.E. ( 1987) The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology . Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
35.
Smith, D.E. ( 1999) Writing the Social: Critique, Theory, and Investigations . Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
36.
Taylor, C. ( 1991) The Malaise of Modernity. Concord, ON: Anansi Press.
37.
Thayer-Bacon, B.J. ( 2003) Relational ’(E)pistemologies’. New York: Peter Lang.
38.
Travers, K.D. ( 1995) ‘Do You Teach Them How to Budget? Professional Discourse in the Construction of Nutritional Inequities’, pp. 213-40 in D. Maurer and J. Sobal (eds) Eating Agendas: Food and Nutrition as Social Problems. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
39.
Webster, R.S. ( 2007) ‘Centring the Subject in Order to Educate’ , Educational Philosophy and Theory39(5): 519-30.
40.
Woodward, K. ( 2002) Understanding Identity. London: Oxford University Press.
