The rise in private share ownership over the last decade is an interesting but relatively poorly researched issue in Australia. In the expectation that relations between large companies and their shareholders are already important and will become increasingly so, we report exploratory longitudinal studies of two aspects of the interaction. Regression analysis of shareholders’ demographic and attitudinal characteristics, drawn from National Social Science and Australian Electoral Study surveys, shows what shareholders might expect from their companies. Content-analysis of corporate annual reports shows how two companies have reacted; here we compare Coles Myer, the subject of recurrent scandal, with Amcor, as a model of corporate responsiveness. We conclude that widespread share ownership is conducive to increasing social tension across a range of dimensions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Agresti, A. (1996) An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis. New York: Wiley .
2.
Anderson, R. and M. Epstein (1996) The Usefulness of Corporate Annual Reports to Shareholders in Australia, New Zealand and the United States: An International Comparison. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press .
3.
ASIC (Australian Securities and Investment Commission) (2002) ‘Shareholders – Have Your Say’ http://www.fido.asic.gov.au (26.6.02).
Bean, C., I. McAllister and D. Gow (2002) Australian Election Study, 2001: Users’ Guide for Machine Readable Data File. Canberra: Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University .
7.
Birch, D. (2001) ‘Shareholder–Corporate Relations in Australia: Some New Economics, Corporate Citizenship and Sustainable Capitalism Perspectives’ http://www.ethics.org.au/ (22.12.01).
8.
Botsman, P. and M. Latham (eds) (2001) The Enabling State: People before Bureaucracy. Sydney: Pluto .
9.
Braithwaite, J. (1988) ‘Economic Policy: What the Electorate Thinks’, pp. 26–35 in J. Kelley and C. Bean (eds) Australian Attitudes: Social and Political Attitudes from the National Social Science Survey. Sydney: Allen and Unwin .
10.
Business for Social Responsibility (2000) ‘Introduction to Corporate Social Responsibility’ http://www.bsr.org/resourcecenter/ (10.6.01).
11.
Carleton, W., J. Nelson and M. Weisbach (1998) ‘ The Influence of Institutions on Corporate Governance through Private Negotiations: Evidence from TIAACREF ’, Journal of Finance53: 1335–62 .
12.
Charkham, J. (1995) Keeping Good Company: A Study of Corporate Governance in Five Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
Crowther, D. (2002) A Social Critique of Corporate Reporting: A Semiotic Analysis of Corporate Financial and Environmental Reporting. Aldershot: Ashgate .
15.
Dean, M. (1999) Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: Sage .
16.
Dean, M. and B. Hindess (eds) (1998) Governing Australia: Studies in Contemporary Rationalities of Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
17.
Dowling, G. (1994) Corporate Reputations: Strategies for Developing the Corporate Brand. Melbourne: Longman Professional .
18.
Drucker, P. (1991) ‘ Reckoning with the Pension Fund Revolution ’, Harvard Business Review March–April: 106–14 .
Elkington, J. (1998) Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st-century Business. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society .
21.
Ethical Investment Association (2001) ‘Socially Responsible Investment in Australia – 2001 Benchmarking Survey’ http://www.eia.org.au (16.6.02)
22.
Hanson, D. and R. White (2004, forthcoming) ‘ Regimes of Risk Management in Corporate Annual Reports: A Case-study of One Globalising Australian Company ’, Journal of Risk Research.
23.
Howard, B. (1998) ‘ A Nation of Shareholders ’, Arena Magazine34: 46–8 .
24.
Jensen-Lee, C. (2001) ‘ The Future of Environmental Issues on Mainstream Political Agenda ’, Australian Journal of Social Issues36: 139–51 .
25.
Kelley, J., C. Bean, M.D.R.Evans and K. Zagorski (1998) International Social Science Survey Australia 1995–96 [computer file]. Canberra: Social Science Data Archives, The Australian National University .
26.
Latham, M. (2001) ‘The New Economy and the New Politics’, pp. 13–35 in P. Botsman and M. Latham (eds) The Enabling State: People before Bureaucracy. Sydney: Pluto .
27.
McLean, T. (2001a) ‘ Reject Zealotry as Triple Trouble ’, The Australian 18 Aug.: 32 .
28.
McLean, T. (2001b) ‘ Reports Must Go beyond Gibberish ’, The Australian 13 Nov.: 28 .
Neu, D., H. Warsame and K. Pedwell (1998) ‘ Managing Public Impressions: Environmental Disclosures in Annual Reports ’, Accounting, Organizations and Society23: 265–82 .
31.
Rose, J. (2001) Ethical and Active Shareholding: An Australian Investor’s Guide. Elsternwick, Vic.: Wrightbooks .
32.
Schaltegger, S., K. Muller and H. Hindrichsen (1996) Corporate Environmental Accounting. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons .
Shareholders’ Project (2001b) ‘A Quantitative Study of Shareholder Attitudes to Investment-related Issues’ http://www.ethics.org.au (21.12.01).
35.
Shareholders’ Project (2001c) ‘A Qualitative Study of Superannuation Trustees and General Financial Managers’ Attitudes to Investment-related Issues’ http://www.ethics.org.au (21.12.01).
36.
Stapledon, G. (1999) ‘ Share Ownership and Control in Listed Australian Companies ’, Corporate Governance International2: 17–32 .
Tricker, R. (1994) International Corporate Governance. Singapore: Prentice-Hall .
39.
Useem, M. (1996) Investor Capitalism: How Money Managers are Changing the Face of Corporate America. New York: Basic Books .
40.
Western, M. (1999) ‘ Who Thinks What About Capitalism? Class Consciousness and Attitudes to Economic Institutions ’, Journal of Sociology35: 351–70 .
41.
Wheeler, S. (1998) ‘ Inclusive Communities and Dialogical Stakeholders: A Methodology for an Authentic Corporate Citizenship ’, Australian Journal of Corporate Law9: 1–20 .
42.
White, A. (2002) ‘ Punters Irrelevant, Say Directors ’, The Australian 21 March: 19 .
43.
White, R. and D. Hanson (2000) ‘ Rationality and Rhetoric in the Corporate World: The Corporate Annual Report as an Aristotelian Genre ’, Prometheus18: 303–17 .
44.
White, R. and D. Hanson (2002a) ‘ Corporate Self, Corporate Reputation and Corporate Annual Reports: Re-enrolling Goffman ’, Scandinavian Journal of Management18: 285–301 .
45.
White, R. and D. Hanson (2002b) ‘ Economic Man and Disciplinary Boundaries: A Case-study in Corporate Annual Reports ’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal15(4): 450–77 .
