Abstract
The passage of the GST legislation through the Senate brings to an end 25 years of debate over whether Australia should radically alter its tax system. This paper investigates the empirical problem of whether there were patterns of public opinion indicating that voters may have been averse to one particular aspect of taxation more than any other. The paper also addresses the methodological problems involved in investigating the suggestion that voters expressed intransitive preferences in regard to taxing and spending.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
