In this article we provide an empirical test of Franklin’s (1999) recent contribution to the burgeoning study of human–animal relations. Drawing on the anthropological claim that animals are good to think with, Franklin used theories of reflexive modernization to explain a shift to increasingly zoocentric and sentimentalized relations with animals. After deriving a series of expectations from this account, we tested them through a content-analysis of over 1000 articles from one Australian newspaper over a 50-year period. Broadly, we found support for Franklin’s key claims. But we also found local contingencies and historical continuities which suggest limits to the sweeping theorizations of change in accounts of reflexive modernization.
Arluke, A. and C. Sanders (1996) Regarding Animals. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
4.
Aslin, H.J. (1996) ‘Speaking of the Wild: Australian Attitudes to Wildlife’, PhD thesis, Canberra, Australian National University.
5.
Aslin, H.J. and T.W. Norton (1995) ‘No One Answer – Sustainable Use of Wildlife in a Multicultural Society’, pp. 73–81 in G.C. Grigg, P.T. Hale and D. Lunney (eds) Conservation through Sustainable Use of Wildlife. St Lucia: Centre for Conservation Biology, University of Queensland.
6.
Babbie, E. (1992) The Practice of Social Research, 6th edn.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
7.
Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society. London: Sage.
8.
Benton, T. (1993) Natural Relations: Ecology, Animal Rights and Social Justice. London: Verso.
9.
Berelson, B. (1971) Content Analysis in Communication Research. New York: Hafner. (Orig. pub. 1952.)
10.
Bourdieu, P. (1992) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, trans. R. Nice. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Orig. pub. 1992.)
11.
Bulbeck, C. (1999) ‘The “Nature Dispositions” of Visitors to Animal Encounter Sites in Australia and New Zealand’, Journal of Sociology35(2): 129–148.
12.
Callon, M. (1986) ‘Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay’, pp. 196–233 in J. Law (ed.) Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
13.
Callon, M. , J. Law and A. Rip (1986) ‘Qualitative Scientometrics’, pp. 103–123 in M. Callon, J. Law and A. Rip (eds) Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World. London: Macmillan.
Eder, K. (1996) The Social Construction of Nature. London: Sage.
16.
Fox, M.W. (1988) Farm Animals: Husbandry, Behavior and Veterinary Practice. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
17.
Franklin, A. (1996) ‘Australian Hunting and Angling Sports and the Changing Nature of Human–Animal Relations in Australia’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology32(3): 39–56.
18.
Franklin, A. (1999) Animals and Modern Cultures: A Sociology of Human–Animal Relations in Modernity. London: Sage.
19.
Franklin, A. (2000) ‘Neo-Darwinian Leisures, the Body and Nature: Hunting and Angling in Modernity’, Body & Society.
20.
Franklin, A. (2001) Nature and Social Theory. London: Sage.
21.
Giddens, A. (1990) The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
22.
Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self Identity. Cambridge: Polity.
23.
Greenacre, M.J. (1993) Correspondence Analysis in Practice. London: Academic Press.
24.
Haraway, D. (1991) Simions, Cyborgs and Women. London: Routledge.
25.
Harvey, D. (1989) The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
26.
Harvey, D. (1996) Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. Oxford: Blackwell.
27.
Hills, A.M. (1993) ‘The Motivational Bases of Attitudes towards Animals’, Society and Animals1(2): 1–11.
28.
Ingold, T. (1988) What Is An Animal?London: Unwin Hyman.
29.
Ingold, T. (1995) ‘Building, Dwelling, Living’, pp. 57–80 in M. Strathern (ed.) Transformations in Anthropological Knowledge. London: Routledge.
30.
Johnson, A. (1991) Factory Farming. London: Blackwell.
31.
Katcher, A.H. and A.M. Beck (eds) (1983a) New Perspectives in Our Lives with Companion Animals. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
32.
Katcher, A.H. and A.M. Beck (1983b) Between Pets and People: The Importance of Animal Companionship. New York: Perigee Books.
33.
Kellert, S.R. (1985) ‘Historical Trends in Perceptions and Uses of Animals in 20th Century America’, Environmental Review9(1): 19–33.
34.
Kellert, S.R. (1993) ‘Attitudes, Knowledge and Behaviour Toward Wildlife Among the Industrial Superpowers: United States, Japan, and Germany’, Journal of Social Issues49(1): 53–69.
35.
Kellert, S.R. (1996) The Value of Life: Biological Diversity and Human Society. Washington, DC: Island Press.
36.
Kellert, S.R. and E.O. Wilson (eds) (1993) The Biophilia Hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
37.
Lash, S. and J. Urry (1987) The End of Organized Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity.
38.
Latour, B. (1991/1994) We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
Lynch, M. (1988) ‘Sacrifice and Transformation of the Animal Body into a Scientific Object’, Social Studies of Science18: 265–289.
40.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1984) The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
41.
Macnaghten, P. and J. Urry (1998) Contested Natures. London: Sage.
42.
McTavish, D.G. and E.B. Pirro (1990) ‘Contextual Content Analysis’, Quality and Quantity24: 245–265.
43.
Mannheim, K. (1971) ‘On the Interpretation of Weltanschauung’, pp. 8–58 in K. Wolff (ed.) From Karl Mannheim. New York: Oxford University Press. (Orig. pub. 1921–2.)
44.
Maryanski, A. and J.H. Turner (1992) The Social Cage: Human Nature and the Evolution of Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
45.
Michael, M. and L. Birke (1994) ‘Enrolling the Core Set: The Case of the Animal Experimentation Controversy’, Social Studies of Science24: 81–95.
46.
Neumann, W.R. (1989) ‘Parallel Content Analysis: Old Paradigms and New Proposals’, Public Communication and Behavior2: 205–289.
47.
Nielson, J.A. and L.A. Delude (1994) ‘Pets as Adjunct Therapists in a Residence for Former Psychiatric Patients’, Anthrozoos7(3): 166–171.
48.
Noske, B. (1997) Beyond Boundaries. Montreal: Black Rose Books.
49.
Ritvo, H. (1987) The Animal Estate: The English and Other Creatures in the Victorian Age. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
50.
Ritvo, H. (1994) ‘Animals in Nineteenth-Century Britain’, pp. 106–126 in A. Manning and J. Serpell (eds) Animals and Human Society. London: Routledge.
51.
Rojek, C. (1995) Decentring Leisure. London: Sage.
52.
Runciman, W.G. (2000) The Social Animal. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Salleh, A. (1997) Ecofeminism as Politics. London: Zed Books.
55.
Singer, P. (1995) Animal Liberation, rev. edn.London: Random House.
56.
Tester, K. (1992) Animals and Society: The Humanity of Animal Rights. London: Routledge.
57.
Thomas, K. (1983) Man and the Natural World: Changing Attitudes in England 1500–1800.London: Allen Lane.
58.
Wall, G. (1999) ‘Science, Nature, and The Nature of Things: An Instance of Canadian Environmental Discourse, 1960–1994’, Canadian Journal of Sociology24(1): 53–85.
59.
Weber, R.P. (1985) Basic Content Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
60.
Weller, S.C. and A.K. Romney (1990) Metric Scaling: Correspondence Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
61.
Wilson, E.O. (1984) Biophilia. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
62.
Wilson, E.O. (1993) ‘Biophilia and the Conservation Ethic’, pp. 2–10 in S.R. Kellert and E.O. Wilson (eds) The Biophilia Hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
63.
Wolfe, R. (1991) ‘The Use of Content Analysis to Assess Corporate Responsibility’, pp. 281–307 in J.E. Post (ed.) Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, Vol. 12. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
