Abstract
At present, priorities are determined by the availability of research methods and facilities geared to selected kinds of research, the special interests of scien tists, political activists and the vendors of indoor ventilation systems. How ever, priorities should be determined on the basis of a realistic appraisal of the incidence and severity of disease attributable to poor indoor air quality. Lists of priorities determined on this latter basis differ widely according to climate, location and affluence. In wealthy Western countries with temperate climates, exposure to the allergenic faeces of bed mites is the most serious and wide spread health problem. In cities in developing countries with hot climates, the mixing of indoor air with outdoor air polluted by traffic and industrial fumes is usually the most serious single problem. By contrast, in poor cold locations, exposure to carbon monoxide and heating and cooking fumes in poorly venti lated or wholly unventilated dwellings comes to the top of the problem list. Further research on sick building syndrome, radon, formaldehyde, fibrous dusts and environmental tobacco smoke merits little priority in relation to the most serious indoor air quality problems found in developing countries.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
