This study experimentally investigates the efficacy of magnetized water in removing carbon fibre dust. Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy (ESEM) was initially utilized to observe the nucleation behaviour of carbon fibre dust within a water vapour environment. Subsequently, an integrated spray dust removal test bench was constructed to assess the effects of three critical factors on dust removal efficiency: water treatment methods (ordinary water vs. magnetized water), configurations of nozzle rows (1–3 rows) and air velocity (0.5–3 m/s). The findings indicated that magnetized water could significantly enhance dust removal efficiency for carbon fibre dust particles sized between 0.3 and 10 μm compared to ordinary water, achieving an efficiency improvement of 16% for particles of 0.3 μm and 20% for particles of 10 μm. The number of nozzle rows could affect the dust removal efficiency of both water types. With ordinary water, efficiency was shown to increase with the number of nozzle rows. However, magnetized water reached its optimal efficiency with two nozzle rows. Additionally, air velocity was inversely related to dust removal efficiency: at an air velocity of 0.5 m/s, the average dust removal efficiency was 83%, which was 7% higher than that of 3 m/s.
ZhangYLuoYWangMXingTHeAHuangZShiZQiaoSTongABaiJZhaoSChenFXuW. Advances in colored carbon-based fiber materials and their emerging applications. SusMat2024; 4: e243.
KehrenDSimonowBBägerDDziurowitzNWenzlaffDThimCNeuhoffJMeyer-PlathAPlitzkoS. Release of respirable fibrous dust from carbon fibers due to splitting along the fiber axis. Aerosol Air Qual Res2019; 19: 2185–2195.
4.
MazumderMKChangRJBondRL. Aerodynamic and morphological properties of carbon-fiber aerosols. Aerosol Sci Technol1982; 1: 427–440.
5.
ZarcbaŁPiszczatowskaKDamanKSoroczynskaKMotamediPSzczepańskiMLudwigN. The relationship between fine particle matter (PM2.5) exposure and upper respiratory tract diseases. JPM2024; 14: 98.
6.
KumoiJIkegamiAMatsumiYFujitaniYIchiharaGYanoTIchiharaS. Assessment of occupational exposure to micro/nano particles generated from carbon fiber-reinforced plastic processing. Annals of Work Exposures and Health2025; 69: 34–47.
7.
MoriyamaAHasegawaTNagayaCHamadaKHimakiTMurakamiMHorieMTakahashiJIwahashiHMoritomiH. Assessment of harmfulness and biological effect of carbon fiber dust generated during new carbon fiber recycling method. J Hazard Mater2019; 378: 120777.
8.
KanojiyaMTMandavgadeNKalbandeVPadoleC. Design and fabrication of cyclone dust collector for industrial application. Mater Today Proc2022; 49: 378–382.
9.
PengYLiuCWangLYinSTongLJiangZ. Experimental study on filtering mixed solid–liquid dust with a sliding granular bed filter. Particuology2021; 58: 16–25.
10.
MolchanovOKrpecKHorákJKuboňováLHopanF. Predicting efficiency for electrostatic precipitation of fly ash from small-scale solid fuel combustion. Sep Purif Technol2021; 270: 118807.
11.
LiCWangHZengXLiXChiJRLiuYBaiQLiLThamZWK. Strategies for enhancing performance sustainability of air filters: challenges and future directions. Sep Purif Technol2025; 376: 133912.
12.
NowakKBukowskaM. Influence of cyclone construction parameters on the efficiency of dust removal. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng2019; 603: 052096.
13.
NieWLiJPengHXuCZhangSChaXYiSMwabaimaFI. Study of spray atomization law and dust suppression effect of a wet dust catcher on a hydraulic support. Energy2024; 305: 132296.
14.
ParkSB. Heterogeneous nucleation models to predict grain size in solidification. Prog Mater Sci2022; 123: 100822.
15.
KarthikaSRadhakrishnanTKKalaichelviP. A review of classical and nonclassical nucleation theories. Cryst Growth Des2016; 16: 6663–6681.
16.
AiX-PNiB-Y. Influence of viscosity and surface tension of fluid on the motion of bubbles. Acta Phys Sin2017; 66: 234702.
17.
EsmaeilnezhadEChoiHJSchaffieMGholizadehMRanjbarM. Characteristics and applications of magnetized water as a green technology. J Cleaner Prod2017; 161: 908–921.
18.
LiuJCaoY. Experimental study on the surface tension of magnetized water. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer2021; 121: 105091.
19.
ZhouQQinBWangFWangH. Experimental investigation on the performance of a novel magnetized apparatus used to improve the dust suppression ability of surfactant-magnetized water. Powder Technol2019; 354: 149–157.
20.
HuoZ-FZhaoQZhangY-H. Experimental study on effects of magnetization on surface tension of water. Procedia Eng2011; 26: 501–505.
21.
WangHDuYWeiXHeX. An experimental comparison of the spray performance of typical water-based dust reduction media. Powder Technol2019; 345: 580–588.
22.
YuYZhangJZhongH. Heterogeneous condensation of magnetized water vapor on fine SiO2 particles. Environ Res2019; 169: 173–179.
23.
XuCNieWPengHZhangS. Numerical simulation study on atomization rule and dust removal effect of surface-active dust suppressants. Environ Sci Pollut Res2023; 30: 66730–66744.
24.
ZhouQQinBMaDJiangN. Novel technology for synergetic dust suppression using surfactant-magnetized water in underground coal mines. Process Saf Environ Prot2017; 109: 631–638.
25.
ZhengYHaoZWangXQiaoJLiX. Study on effect of magnetization on wetting characteristics of water with different ions to coal dust. Fuel2024; 367: 131441.
26.
WalrafenGE. Raman Spectral studies of water structure. J Chem Phys1964; 40: 3249–3256.
27.
KirkhamMB. 3 - Structure and properties of water. In: KirkhamMB (ed.) Principles of soil and plant water relations. Burlington: Academic Press, 2005, pp. 27–40.
28.
ToledoEJLRamalhoTCMagriotisZM. Influence of magnetic field on physical–chemical properties of the liquid water: insights from experimental and theoretical models. J Mol Struct2008; 888: 409–415.
29.
IwasakaMUenoS. Structure of water molecules under 14 T magnetic field. J Appl Phys1998; 83: 6459–6461.
30.
CaiRYangHHeJZhuW. The effects of magnetic fields on water molecular hydrogen bonds. J Mol Struct2009; 938: 15–19.
31.
PangX-FDengBTangB. Influences of magnetic field on macroscopic properties of water. Mod Phys Lett B2012; 26: 1250069.
32.
WangCLuSLiMZhangYSaZLiuJWangHWangS. Study on the dust removal and temperature reduction coupling performances of magnetized water spray. Environ Sci Pollut Res2022; 29: 6151–6165.
