This study analysed the performance of a hot-water pipe (HWP) and fan-coil units (FCUs) in controlling microclimate conditions in a net-zero energy greenhouse (NZEG). The performance of a previously developed TraNsient SYstem Simulation (TRNSYS) model for the NZEG was enhanced to include a crop model and several HWP emission standards, and the improved TRNSYS model was used to analyse heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems for different greenhouse sizes in the Republic of Korea. Further, an economic analysis was conducted. The model validation showed excellent agreement between the measured and simulated values, with Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency of 0.98. The presence of crop in the simulation model reduced the total heating load by 14.5 MWh and increased the cooling load by 4 MWh. The capacity of the FCU was increased as the outside temperature rose from 33.4 to 36.4 in summer, and the diameter of the HWP was decreased from 25A to 10A as the outside temperature rose from −21.7 to −12.2 in winter to maintain the greenhouse at the desired temperature of 15. Notably, the payback period was reduced by 9 years when the annual savings in heating energy costs and revenue from carbon trading were considered as a part of the net economic cash flow.
RasheedAKimHTLeeHW. Modeling-based energy performance assessment and validation of air-to-water heat pump system integrated with multi-span greenhouse on cooling mode. Agronomy2022; 12: 1374.
2.
XiaoXZhouJYangW. Review of calculating models of unsteady natural ventilation rate due to wind fluctuations. Indoor Built Environ2022; 31: 2199–2215.
3.
RuanJLiuJ. Investigation into the thermal comfort and some passive strategies for traditional architecture of Li nationality in South China. Indoor Built Environ2023; 32(7): 1349–1371.
4.
Noorian NajafabadiSADingEHobeikaNBluyssenPM. Do wool carpets ‘clean’ the air or not? A study on the sorption effects of wool carpets by sensory evaluation. Indoor Built Environ2024; 33(1): 95–111. DOI: 10.1177/1420326X231186308.
5.
YeJLinCLiuJAiZZhangG. Systematic summary and analysis of Chinese HVAC guidelines coping with COVID-19. Indoor Built Environ2022; 31: 1176–1192.
6.
TianSSuXShaoXWangL. Optimization and evaluation of a solar energy, heat pump and desiccant wheel hybrid system in a nearly zero energy building. Build Simulat2020; 13: 1291–1303.
7.
ZhangZWuMYaoW. Performance of the wall implanted with heat pipes on indoor thermal environment. Indoor Built Environ2022; 31: 878–894.
8.
ItoKHattoriK. Numerical prediction of thermal environment and energy consumption in tunnel-type greenhouse with supplementary air-mixing and heating device. Indoor Built Environ2012; 21: 292–303.
9.
RabiuANaWHAkpenpuunTDRasheedAAdesanyaMAOgunlowoQOKimHTLeeHW. Determination of overall heat transfer coefficient for greenhouse energy-saving screen using Trnsys and hotbox. Biosyst Eng2022; 217: 83–101.
10.
ZakirEOgunlowoQOAkpenpuunTDNaWHAdesanyaMARabiuAAdedejiOSKimHTLeeHW. Effect of thermal screen position on greenhouse microclimate and impact on crop growth and yield. Niger J Technol Dev2023; 19(4): 417–432. DOI: 10.4314/njtd.v19i4.15.
11.
KittasCBartzanasTJaffrinA. Greenhouse evaporative cooling: measurement and data analysis. Acta Hortic2000; 44(3): 683–689.
12.
YangSHRheeJY. Utilization and performance evaluation of a surplus air heat pump system for greenhouse cooling and heating. Appl Energy2013; 105: 244–251.
13.
ChenJXuFTanDShenZZhangLAiQ. A control method for agricultural greenhouses heating based on computational fluid dynamics and energy prediction model. Appl Energy2015; 141: 106–118.
14.
Opeyemi OgunlowoQDenen AkpenpuunTHo NaWAderemi AdesanyaMRabiuADuttaPKimHTLeeHW. Simulation of greenhouse energy and strawberry (Seolhyang sp.) yield using TRNSYS DVBES: a base case. Sol Energy2023; 266: 112196.
15.
OgunlowoQONaWHRabiuAAdesanyaMAAkpenpuunTDKimHTLeeHW. Effect of envelope characteristics on the accuracy of discretized greenhouse model in TRNSYS. J Agric Eng2022; 53(3): 1420. DOI: 10.4081/jae.2022.1420.
16.
AkpenpuunTDOgunlowoQORabiuAAdesanyaMANaWHOmobowaleMOMijinyawaYLeeHW. Building energy simulation model application to greenhouse microclimate, covering material and thermal blanket modelling: a review. Niger J Technol Dev2022; 19: 276–286.
17.
OgunlowoQOAkpenpunTDNaWHAdesanyaMARabiuADuttaPKimHTLeeHW. Energy- and yield-based performance evaluation of a phase change material–integrated single-span double-layered with a thermal screen greenhouse. Therm Sci Eng Prog2024; 50: 102499.
18.
AhamedMSGuoHTaninoK. Modeling heating demands in a Chinese-style solar greenhouse using the transient building energy simulation model TRNSYS. J Build Eng2020; 29: 101114.
19.
BaglivoCMazzeoDPanicoSBonusoSMateraNCongedoPMOlivetiG. Complete greenhouse dynamic simulation tool to assess the crop thermal well-being and energy needs. Appl Therm Eng2020; 179: 115698.
20.
MashonjowaERonsseFMilfordJRPietersJG. Modelling the thermal performance of a naturally ventilated greenhouse in Zimbabwe using a dynamic greenhouse climate model. Sol Energy2013; 91: 381–393.
21.
PietersJGDeltourJM. Modelling solar energy input in greenhouses. Sol Energy1999; 67: 119–130.
22.
TalbotMHMonfetD. Estimating the impact of crops on peak loads of a Building-Integrated Agriculture space. Sci Technol Built Environ2020; 26: 1448–1460.
23.
GraamansLvan den DobbelsteenAMeinenEStanghelliniC. Plant factories; crop transpiration and energy balance. Agric Syst2017; 153: 138–147.
24.
KwiatkowskiJFeretKWoloszynMRouxJ. Predicting indoor relative humidity using building energy simulation tools. In: IAQVEC 2007 proceedings - 6th international conference on indoor air quality, ventilation and energy conservation in buildings: sustainable built environment. Sendai, Japan, 28–31 October 2007, Vol. 1, pp. 233–240.
25.
WardRChoudharyRCundyCJohnsonGMcRobieA. Simulation of plants in buildings; incorporating plant-air interactions in building energy simulation. In: 14th international conference of IBPSA - building simulation 2015, BS 2015, conference proceedings. Hyderabad, India, 7–9 December 2015, pp. 2256–2263.
26.
AdesanyaMANaWRabiuAOgunlowoQOAkpenpuunTDRasheedAYoonYCLeeHW. TRNSYS simulation and experimental validation of internal temperature and heating demand in a glass greenhouse. Sustainability2022; 14: 8283.
27.
LiuJBaoLYeBWangJ. Low-carbon progressive design for sustainable development of buildings. Indoor Built Environ2023; 32(8): 1638–1656.
ShinH-HNamS-W. Analysis of heat emission from hot water pipe for greenhouse heating system design. Phpf2019; 28: 204–211.
30.
ASHRAE Guideline 14-2014. Measurement of energy, demand, and water savings. Peachtree Corners: ASHRAE, Guideline 14-2014, 2014, Vol. 4, pp. 1–150.
31.
CengelYGhajarA. Heat and mass transfer fundamentals & applications. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education, 2015.
32.
ZotarelliLDukesMDRomeroCCMigliaccioKWMorganKT. Step by step calculation of the Penman-Monteith evapotranspiration (FAO-56 method). AE459. Gainesville, FL: Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences University of Florida, 2014, pp. 1–14.
33.
BambaraJAthienitisAK. Energy and economic analysis for the design of greenhouses with semi-transparent photovoltaic cladding. Renew Energy2019; 131: 1274–1287.
34.
KimDKimM-HLeeD-W. Economic and environmental analysis of solar thermal and seasonal thermal energy storage based on a renewable energy conversion system for greenhouses. Energies2022; 15: 6592.
35.
AdesanyaMAYakubAORabiuAOwolabiABOgunlowoQOYahayaANaWHKimMHKimHTLeeHW. Dynamic modeling and techno-economic assessment of hybrid renewable energy and thermal storage systems for a net-zero energy greenhouse in South Korea. Clean Technol Environ Policy2024; 26: 551–576. DOI: 10.1007/s10098-023-02656-3.
RabiuAAdesanyaMANaWHOgunlowoQOAkpenpuunTDKimHTLeeHW. Thermal performance and energy cost of Korean Multispan greenhouse energy-saving screens. Energy2023; 285: 129514.
41.
NaseerMPerssonTRighiniIStanghelliniCMaessenHVerheulMJ. Bio-economic evaluation of greenhouse designs for seasonal tomato production in Norway. Biosyst Eng2021; 212: 413–430.
42.
RaimundoAMSaraivaNBOliveiraAVM. Thermal insulation cost optimality of opaque constructive solutions of buildings under Portuguese temperate climate. Build Environ2020; 182: 107107. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107107.
43.
BaudoinWNono-WomdimRLutaladioNHodderACastillaNLeonardiCDe PascaleSQaryoutiM. Cultural practices and environment. Hobby Hydroponics. London: CRC Press, pp. 42–55.
44.
MAFRA. Statistics of the agriculture, food, and rural affairs. Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs, https://www.mafra.go.kr/english/index.do (2017, accessed 11 January 2023).
