This study investigated the impact of two types of internal blinds on the indoor thermal environment of a highly glazed office room in Istanbul during summer. The research examined four configurations: (i) no blinds, (ii) roller blinds, (iii) layered roller blinds in night mode and (iv) layered roller blinds in day mode. Measurements of air velocity, average radiation temperature, air temperature and relative humidity were conducted to assess thermal comfort. The findings revealed that internal blinds significantly influence thermal comfort in radiantly cooled office spaces during summer. Without blinds, the indoor environment only met ISO 7730 comfort category C, with average predicted mean vote (PMV) and predicted percentage of dissatisfied (PPD) values of 0.6 and 12.5%, respectively. However, with internal blinds, comfort categories A and B were achieved, resulting in improved thermal comfort levels, with average PMV and PPD values ranging from 0.2 to 0.3 and 6% to 7.5%, respectively. Roller blinds, in particular, proved highly effective in enhancing thermal comfort and reducing mean radiant and indoor air temperatures in highly glazed radiant cooling offices. This demonstrated their energy-efficient potential for improving indoor thermal comfort.
United Nations. World population prospects 2019. (ST/ESA/SER.A/423). New York: UN Department of Economics and Social affairs, Population Division, 2019.
DanishMSSSenjyuTIbrahimiAMHowladerA. A managed framework for energy-efficient building. J Build Eng2019; 21: 120–128.
4.
Tye-GingrasMGosselinL. Comfort and energy consumption of hydronic heating radiant ceilings and walls based on CFD analysis. Build Environ2012; 54: 1–13.
5.
BabiakJOlesenBWPetrášD. Low temperature heating and high temperature cooling: rehva guidebook NO.7. Brussels: REHVA, 2009.
6.
TangHZhangTLiuXJiangY. Novel method for the design of radiant floor cooling systems through homogenizing spatial solar radiation distribution. Sol Energy2018; 170: 885–895.
7.
AcikgozOKarakoyunYDukhanNDalkılıçA. Realistic experimental heat transfer characteristics of radiant floor heating using sidewalls as heat sinks. Energy Build2019; 183: 515–526.
8.
KarakoyunYAcikgozODalkilicA. An experimental investigation on heat transfer characteristics arising over an underfloor cooling system exposed to different radiant heating loads through walls. Appl Therm Eng2020; 164: 114517. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114517.
9.
FonsecaN. Experimental analysis and modeling of hydronic radiant ceiling panels using transient-state analysis. Int J Refrig2011; 34: 958–967.
10.
FonsecaN. Experimental study of thermal condition in a room with hydronic cooling radiant surfaces. Int J Refrig2011; 34: 686–695.
11.
LiZZhangDLiC. Experimental evaluation of indoor thermal environment with modularity radiant heating in low energy buildings. Int J Refrig2021; 123: 159–168.
12.
HernandezACFumoN. A review of variable refrigerant flow HVAC system components for residential application. Int J Refrig2020; 110: 47–57.
13.
WuXLiuGTianZGaoJ. Occupant’s thermal comfort in a radiant ceiling cooling room with hot wall surface. Indoor Built Environ2023; 32: 699–718.
14.
KaracavusBAydinK. Numerical investigation of general and local thermal comfort of an office equipped with radiant panels. Indoor Built Environ2019; 28: 806–824.
15.
RheeKNKimKW. A 50 year review of basic and applied research in radiant heating and cooling systems for the built environment. Build Environ2015; 91: 166–190.
16.
KarmannCSchiavonSBaumanF. Thermal comfort in buildings using radiant vs. all-air systems: a critical literature review. Build Environ2017; 111: 123–131.
17.
OxizidisSPapadopoulosAM. Performance of radiant cooling surfaces with respect to energy consumption and thermal comfort. Energy Build2013; 57: 199–209.
18.
TianZYangLWuXGuanZ. A field study of occupant thermal comfort with radiant ceiling cooling and overhead air distribution system. Energy Build2020; 223: 109949.
19.
OkamotoSKitoraHYamaguchiHOkaT. A simplified calculation method for estimating heat flux from ceiling radiant panels. Energy Build2010; 42: 29–33.
20.
ZhangDLiCLiZ. Experimental study on performance of different local radiant cooling schemes. Int J Refrig2023; 151: 241–252. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2023.04.002.
21.
ZhengJYuTLeiBChenC. Experimental study on the thermal performance of radiant floor heating system with the influence of solar radiation on the local floor surface. Indoor Built Environ2023; 32: 977–991.
22.
LeeKHKimTLeeGLeeJ. Cooling load reduction effect and its mechanism in between-glass cavity and Venetian blind operation during the summer season. Build Simulat2013; 6: 351–364.
23.
TzempelikosAAthienitisAK. The effect of shading design and control on building cooling demand. Passive and Low Energy Cooling for the Built Environment2005; 81: 953–958.
24.
LiDHWLamTNTWongSLTsangE. Lighting and cooling energy consumption in an open-plan office using solar film coating. Energy2008; 33: 1288–1297.
25.
PfrommerPLomasKJKupkeC. Solar radiation transport through slat-type blinds: a new model and its application for thermal simulation of buildings. Sol Energy1996; 57: 77–91.
26.
YahodaDSWrightJL. Heat transfer analysis of a between-panes Venetian blind using effective longwave radiative properties. Build Eng2004; 110(1): 455–462.
27.
WrightJLCollinsMRHuangNYT. Thermal Resistance of a Window with an enclosed Venetian blind : guarded heater plate measurements. Build Eng2006; 114: 13–21.
28.
ChaiyapinuntSKhampornN. Heat transmission through a glass window with a curved Venetian blind installed. Sol Energy2014; 110: 71–82.
29.
de Loyola Ramos GarciaDRuttkay PereiraFO. Method application and analyses of visual and thermal-energy performance prediction in offices buildings with internal shading devices. Build Environ2021; 198: 107912.
30.
LittlefairPOrtizJDasBC. A simulation of solar shading control on UK office energy use. Build Res Inf2010; 38: 638–646.
31.
O’BrienWKapsisKAthienitisAK. Manually-operated window shade patterns in office buildings: a critical review. Build Environ2013; 60: 319–338.
32.
NikpourMKandarMZMosaviE. Investigating daylight quality using self-shading strategy in energy commission building in Malaysia. Indoor Built Environ2013; 22: 822–835.
33.
NewshamGR. Manual control of window blinds and electric lighting: implications for comfort and energy consumption. Indoor Environ1994; 3: 135–144.
34.
DemanegaIDe MicheleGPernigottoGGasparellaAAvesaniS. Development and experimental validation of a CFD model for the thermal behaviour assessment of Complex Fenestration Systems. J Build Eng2023; 68: 106150. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106150.
35.
ToumaAAOuahraniD. Shading and day-lighting controls energy savings in offices with fully-Glazed façades in hot climates. Energy Build2017; 151: 263–274.
36.
CaoDVKicP. An analysis of influences of blinds and solar radiation on microclimate in office rooms during summer days: a pilot study. Agron Res2019; 17: 945–956.
37.
SimmlerHBinderB. Experimental and numerical determination of the total solar energy transmittance of glazing with Venetian blind shading. Build Environ2008; 43: 197–204.
38.
CarlettiCSciurpiFPierangioliLAsdrubaliFPiselloALBianchiFSambucoSGuattariC. Thermal and lighting effects of an external Venetian blind: experimental analysis in a full scale test room. Build Environ2016; 106: 45–56.
39.
SeongY-BYeoM-SKimK-W. Optimized control algorithm for automated Venetian blind system considering solar profile variation in buildings. Indoor Built Environ2014; 23: 890–914.
40.
Palmero-MarreroAIOliveiraAC. Effect of louver shading devices on building energy requirements. Appl Energy2010; 87: 2040–2049.
41.
TzempelikosABessoudoMAthienitisAKZmeureanuR. Indoor thermal environmental conditions near glazed facades with shading devices - Part II: thermal comfort simulation and impact of glazing and shading properties. Build Environ2010; 45: 2517–2525.
42.
FrontiniFKuhnTE. The influence of various internal blinds on thermal comfort: a new method for calculating the mean radiant temperature in office spaces. Energy Build2012; 54: 527–533.
43.
KayaciNDemirH. Comparative performance analysis of building foundation Ground heat exchanger. Geothermics2020; 83: 101710.
44.
KayaciNDemirH. Numerical modelling of transient soil temperature distribution for horizontal ground heat exchanger of ground source heat pump. Geothermics2018; 73: 33–47.
45.
DoganAKayaciNKanburBBDemirH. Experimental investigation of mean radiant temperature trends for a ground source heat pump-integrated radiant wall and ceiling heating system. Buildings. 2023; 13: 2420. DOI:10.3390/buildings13102420.
46.
DoganAKayaciNDemirHSevindirMK. An experimental comparison of radiant wall and ceiling cooling system integrated with ground source heat pump and direct expansion fan coil system in a highly glazed office room. Energy Build. 2022; 273: 112412. DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112412.
47.
DoganAKayaciNDemirHSevindirMK. Experimental investigation of thermal comfort performance of a radiant wall and ceiling panel system. J Therm Eng2022; 8: 551–561.
48.
ANSI-ASHRAE standard 55-2023 thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. Washington, D.C.: ANSI, 2023.
49.
ISO 7726: 1998. Ergonomics of the thermal environment - instruments for measuring physical quantities. Geneva: ISO, 1998.
50.
International Organization for Standardization. Ergonomics of the thermal environment — analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2015. www.iso.org
51.
KhampornNChaiyapinuntS. Effect of installing a Venetian blind to a glass window on human thermal comfort. Build Environ2014; 82: 713–725.
52.
Ole FangerP. Thermal comfort. Analysis and applications in environmental engineering. Copenhagen: Danish Technical Press, 1970, 45, p. 244.
53.
BS EN 14240:2004. Ventilation for buildings. Chilled ceilings. Testing and rating. London: British Standards Institution, 2004.
