The standard Brazilian school projects (EMEIs) were created for the Proinfância [Pro-Childhood] program to respond to the growing national demand for public schools. Unfortunately, the project disregards the Brazilian local climate, leading to an inadequate architectural design, especially in terms of energy performance. Within this context, this research aimed to assess the impact of a new geometric design and envelope proposal on the energy performance of a Brazilian school building. The study object is a standard project (EMEI) of the Proinfância program located in Pelotas, Brazil. Two distinct multi-objective optimizations were performed based on EnergyPlus coupled with the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm 2 (SPEA2), in which the objective functions were defined to minimize heating and cooling Energy Use Intensity (EUI) for different geometric designs (Base and Linear models). The design variables considered were window-to-wall ratio (WWR); thermal insulation thickness for walls and floor; solar absorptance values for walls and roof; and solar orientation. A total of 74.520 simulations were carried out, and the results indicated that the new geometric design combined with bioclimatic envelope strategies was capable of reducing 52% of the Energy Use Intensity when compared to the standard school project.
CabezaLFRincónLVilariñoVPerezGCastellA. Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2014; 29: 394–416.
4.
KatsG. Greening our built world: costs, benefits, and strategies. 62603rd ed.Washington: Island Press, 2009.
5.
OchoaJHAraújoDLSattlerMA. Análise do conforto ambiental em salas de aula: comparação entre dados técnicos e a percepção do usuário. Ambient Constr2012; 12: 91–114.
FNDE FNDDDE. Fundo nacional de desenvolvimento da educação. Resolução/CD/FNDE No 006 de 24 de abril de 2007 - estabelece as orientações e diretrizes para execução e assistência financeira suplementar ao programa nacional de reestruturação e aquisição de equipamentos para a rede escolar pública de educação infantil – PROINFÂNCIA, www.fnde.gov.br (accessed 6 November 2022).
9.
DalbemRCunhaEG daVicenteRFigueiredoAJSilvaACSBd. Discussão do desempenho da envoltória de uma passive house adaptada à zona bioclimática 2 em acordo com o RTQ-R. Ambient Constr2017; 17: 201–222.
10.
ChatzidiakouLMumovicDSummerfieldAJHongSAltamirano-MedinaH. A Victorian school and a low carbon designed school: comparison of indoor air quality, energy performance, and student health. Indoor Built Environ2014; 23: 417–432.
11.
DhalluinALimamK. Comparison of natural and hybrid ventilation strategies used in classrooms in terms of indoor environmental quality, comfort and energy savings. Indoor Built Environ2014; 23: 527–542.
12.
AliHHAlmomaniHMHindeihM. Evaluating indoor environmental quality of public school buildings in Jordan. Indoor Built Environ2009; 18: 66–76.
13.
IssaMHRankinJHAttallaMChristianA. Absenteeism, performance and occupant satisfaction with the indoor environment of green Toronto schools. Indoor Built Environ2011; 20: 511–523.
14.
BatraUSinghalS. Optimum level of insulation for energy efficient envelope of office buildings. Int J Environ Sci Technol2017; 14: 2389–2398.
15.
YuWLiBJiaHZhangMWangD. Application of multi-objective genetic algorithm to optimize energy efficiency and thermal comfort in building design. Energy Build2015; 88: 135–143.
16.
AlwetaishiMTakiA. Investigation into energy performance of a school building in a hot climate: optimum of window-to-wall ratio. Indoor Built Environ2020; 29: 24–39.
17.
ZhaiYWangYHuangYMengX. A multi-objective optimization methodology for window design considering energy consumption, thermal environment and visual performance. Renew Energy2019; 134: 1190–1199.
18.
de GastinesMCorreaÉPattiniA. Heat transfer through window frames in EnergyPlus: model evaluation and improvement. Adv Build Energy Res2019; 13: 138–155.
19.
GuardaELADomingosRMADuranteLCCallejasIJA. Influência da absortância em sistemas verticais: diagnóstico do impacto no consumo energético de um edifício comercial na cidade de Sinop-MT. Braz J Dev2019; 5: 20845–20859.
20.
SartoriG,Avaliação do impacto da orientação solar no conforto e desempenho térmico de projeto padrão de pré-escola do programa proinfância nas zonas bioclimáticas brasileiras. Masters dissertation. Porto Alegre. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Escola de Engenharia, 2019.
21.
EvinsR. A review of computational optimisation methods applied to sustainable building design. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2013; 22: 230–245.
22.
GhasemiMKandarMZNorooziM. Investigating the effect of well geometry on the daylight performance in the adjoining spaces of vertical top-lit atrium buildings. Indoor Built Environ2016; 25: 934–948.
23.
CoakleyDRafteryPKeaneM. A review of methods to match building energy simulation models to measured data. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2014; 37: 123–141.
24.
ZaluskiPRdSDantasMJP. Aplicação de softwares de simulação na educação em engenharia: um relato de experiências internacionais exitosas em cursos de modelagem e simulação de sistemas/application of simulation softwares in engineering education: a report of successful international experiences in modeling and system simulation courses. Brazilian Appl Sci Rev2018; 2: 170–181.
25.
PanLLiKXueWLiuG. Multi-objective optimization for building performance design considering thermal comfort and energy consumption. In: Proceedings of the 35th Chinese Control Conference CCC, Chengdu, 27–29 July 2016, pp. 2799–2803.
26.
DelgarmNSajadiBKowsaryFDelgarmS. Multi-objective optimization of the building energy performance: a simulation-based approach by means of particle swarm optimization (PSO). Appl Energy2016; 170: 293–303.
27.
HuangKTHwangRL. Parametric study on energy and thermal performance of school buildings with natural ventilation, hybrid ventilation and air conditioning. Indoor Built Environ2016; 25: 1148–1162.
28.
BreFRomanNFachinottiVD. An efficient metamodel-based method to carry out multi-objective building performance optimizations. Energy Build2020; 206: 109576. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109576
29.
NguyenATReiterSRigoP. A review on simulation-based optimization methods applied to building performance analysis. Appl Energy2014; 113: 1043–1058.
GouveiaLBAraújoACM deTeixeiraJdFSantosGT. Algoritmos genéticos: aplicando a teoria a um estudo de caso/genetic algorithms: applying theory to a case study. Braz J Dev2021; 7: 21053–21077.
32.
LinczukVCCBastosLEG. Otimização multiobjetivo orientada ao desempenho térmico para o projeto de edificações de baixo consumo de energia na Região Sul do Brasil. Ambient Constr2020; 20: 509–529.
33.
YigitSOzorhonB. A simulation-based optimization method for designing energy efficient buildings. Energy Build2018; 178: 216–227.
34.
SampaioPREm CiênciasM. Teoria, métodos e aplicações de otimização multiobjetivo. Tesesuspbr2011; 70: 758–772.
35.
MachairasVTsangrassoulisAAxarliK. Algorithms for optimization of building design: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2014; 31: 101–112.
36.
AttiaSHamdyMO’BrienWCarloucciS. Computational optimisation for zero energy buildings design: Interviews results with twenty eight international experts. Proceedings of BS2013: 13th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association, Chambery, France, 26–28 August 2013, pp. 3698–3705.
37.
Ferdyn-GrygierekJGrygierekK. Multi-variable optimization of building thermal design using genetic algorithms. Energies2017; 10: 1570–1620.
38.
de Lemos MartinsTA. De condicionantes solares à oportunidades de desenho urbano - otimização de tipo-morfologias urbanas, em contexto de clima tropical. Universidade federal do Rio de Janeiro, Faculdade de arquitetura e urbanismo, Programa de pós-graduação em arquitetura. RJ: ABNT, 2014.
39.
HollandJH. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: an introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. Ann Arbor: Ann Arbor Univ Michigan Press, 1975, viii, p. 183.
40.
FonsecaLPGNunesVDLSantanaLOCarloJCCésar JúniorKML. Otimização multiobjetivo das dimensões dos ambientes de uma residência unifamiliar baseada em simulação energética e estrutural. Ambient Constr2017; 17: 267–288.
41.
Méndez EchenaguciaTCapozzoliACasconeYSassoneM. The early design stage of a building envelope: multi-objective search through heating, cooling and lighting energy performance analysis. Appl Energy2015; 154: 577–591.
42.
CaldasLSantosL. Painting with light: an interactive evolutionary system for daylighting design. Build Environ2016; 109: 154–174.
43.
GouSNikVMScartezziniJLZhaoQLiZ. Passive design optimization of newly-built residential buildings in Shanghai for improving indoor thermal comfort while reducing building energy demand. Energy Build2018; 169: 484–506.
44.
PapadopoulosSKontokostaCEVlachokostasAAzarE. Rethinking HVAC temperature setpoints in commercial buildings: the potential for zero-cost energy savings and comfort improvement in different climates. Build Environ2019; 155: 350–359.
45.
WangXMaiXLeiBBiHZhaoBMaoG. Collaborative optimization between passive design measures and active heating systems for building heating in Qinghai-Tibet plateau of China. Renew Energy2020; 147: 683–694.
46.
DebKPratapAAgarwalSMeyarivanT. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput2002; 6: 182–197.
47.
Senel SolmazAHaliciogluFHGunhanS. An approach for making optimal decisions in building energy efficiency retrofit projects. Indoor Built Environ2018; 27: 348–368.
48.
ZitzlerELaumannsMThieleL. SPEA2: Improving the strength pareto evolutionary algorithm. TIK Report; 103: 05–2001, doi:10.3929/ethz-a-004284029
49.
ParetoV. Cours d’economie politique - tome II, livre II. 4th ed, un document produit en version numérique par Mme Marcelle Bergeron, bénévole, professeure à la retraite de l’École Dominique-Racine de Chicoutimi, Québec 6 Avril, 2006 à Chicoutimi, Ville de Saguenay, Province de Québec.
50.
SantanaLO. Otimização multiobjetivo da geometria de edificações residenciais energeticamente eficientes por meio de algoritmos genéticos. Universidade Federal de Viçosa, http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/11536?show=full (2020, accessed 6 November 2022).
51.
DalbemRGrala da CunhaEVicenteRFigueiredoAOliveiraRSilvaACSBd. Optimisation of a social housing for south of Brazil: from basic performance standard to passive house concept. Energy2019; 167: 1278–1296.
52.
MacielTdSLeitzkeRKDuarteCdMSchrammFKCunhaEG. Otimização termoenergética de uma edificação escolar: discussão sobre o desempenho de quatro algoritmos evolutivos multiobjetivo. Ambient Constr2021; 21: 221–246.
53.
AlmeidaLSS. Influência de parâmetros físicos e geométricos no desempenho termoenergético de habitações unifamiliares. Florianópolis: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 2014.
54.
SorgatoMJ. Desempenho térmico de Edificações residenciais unifamiliares ventiladas naturalmente. Florianópolis: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 2009.
55.
MonteiroVMLDM. Por Uma moradia termicamente confortável proposta de habitação de interesse social com ênfase no conforto térmico. Natal: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, 2012.
56.
OliveiraPALunardiDG. Influência da envoltória no desempenho termoenergético de edificações institucionais no semiárido. PARC Pesq em Arquit e Constr2018; 9(4): 276–289. DOI: 10.20396/parc.v9i4.8651048
57.
SantessoCAChvatalKMS. Consumo energético de salas de escritório climatizadas de modo misto em São Paulo: considerações sobre o projeto. Ambient Constr2018; 18: 119–137.
HamdyMHasanASirenK. Applying a multi-objective optimization approach for design of low-emission cost-effective dwellings. Build Environ2011; 46: 109–123.
61.
AsadiEda SilvaMGAntunesCHDiasL. A multi-objective optimization model for building retrofit strategies using TRNSYS simulations, GenOpt and MATLAB. Build Environ2012; 56: 370–378.
62.
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). EnergyPlus, https://energyplus.net/ (accessed 20 May 2023).
63.
GneccoVMGeraldiMSFossatiMTrianaM. Comparison between national and local benchmarking models: the case of public nursery schools in Southern Brazil. Sustain Cities Soc2022; 78: 103639. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103639
64.
GeraldiMSGhisiE. Data-driven framework towards realistic bottom-up energy benchmarking using an artificial neural network. Appl Energy2022; 306(Part A): 117960. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117960
65.
MeansJH. Basal metabolism and body surface. J Biol Chem1915; 21: 263–268.
ANSI/ASHRAE STANDARD 55-2020. Thermal environment conditions for human occupancy. Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, 2020. ISSN 1041-2336.
70.
VeigaRKEliLGOlingerMSMazzaferroLPereiraHACMeloAPVersageRSorgatoMLambertsR. Manual de simulação computacional de edifícios naturalmente ventilados no programa energyplus–versão 9.0.1. 2020. Florianópolis: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, pp. 1–38.
LeitzkeRKBeltrameCMFreitasJRSeixasJNMacielTSCunhaEGRheingantzPA. Optimization of the traditional method for creating a weather simulation file: the pelotas.epw case. J Civ Eng Archit2018; 12(10): 741–756. DOI: 10.17265/1934-7359/2018.10.006
73.
MillmanKJAivazisM. Python for scientists and engineers. Comput Sci Eng2011; 13: 9–12.
74.
WestermannPChristiaanseTBeckettWKovacsPEvinsR. Besos: building and energy simulation, optimization and surrogate modelling. J Open Source Softw2021; 6: 2677.
75.
ChingF. Arquitetura, forma, espaço e ordem. 3rd ed.São Paulo: Bookman, 2013, p. p456.
76.
HamdyMNguyenATHensenJLM. A performance comparison of multi-objective optimization algorithms for solving nearly-zero-energy-building design problems. Energy Build2016; 121: 57–71.
77.
ChenXShengXLiuYLiZSunXJiangCQiRYuanSWangXZhouGZhenYXiePLiuQYanBZhaoC. Distinct mutations with different inheritance mode caused similar retinal dystrophies in one family: a demonstration of the importance of genetic annotations in complicated pedigrees. Appl Energy2018; 16: 145–158.
78.
MarriottFHCDanielWW. Biostatistics: a foundation for analysis in the health sciences. 10th ed.New York: Wiley Publishing Co, 2013. DOI: 10.2307/2530782
79.
NgatchouPZareiAEl-SharkawiMA. Pareto multi objective optimization. Proc 13th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Application to Power Systems ISAP’05 2005, Arlington, VA, USA, 06–10 November 2005, pp. 84–91.
