Ceiling fans are the ubiquitously used electrical appliance in indoor spaces that affect the local airflow pattern and, consequently, transmission of airborne pathogens and respiratory droplets. This study numerically investigated the effect of airflow induced by the ceiling fan and ventilation rate on aerosol distribution to mitigate exposure to airborne pathogens and COVID-19. A full-scale room with a ceiling fan, natural ventilation and an occupant was modelled through transient computational fluid-particle dynamics (CFPD). To analyze the relationship between the ceiling fan rotation speed and the aerosol distribution, a ceiling fan was operated with 160, 265 and 365 revolutions per minute (RPM). The effect of the ceiling fan on particles was analyzed for particles of different sizes. The increasing ceiling fan rotation speed, the percentage deposition of the aerosol particles with diameters >40 μm was increased. The effect of different ventilation rates on aerosol distribution was evaluated. The increased ventilation rate, the percentage of the total aerosol particles flushed out was increased. The effectiveness of the mask in mitigating the exposure risk of airborne pathogens was also investigated. In combination with the natural ventilation and mask, the ceiling fan was demonstrated to have the potential to reduce airborne pathogen transmission in indoor spaces.
AsadiSBouvierNWexlerASRistenpartWD. The coronavirus pandemic and aerosols: Does COVID-19 transmit via expiratory particles?Aerosol Sci Tech2020; 54(6): 635–638. DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2020.1749229
3.
JayaweeraMPereraHGunawardanaBManatungeJ. Transmission of COVID-19 virus by droplets and aerosols: A critical review on the unresolved dichotomy. Environ Res2020; 188: 109819, DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109819
4.
XuCLuoXYuCCaoS-J. The 2019-nCoV epidemic control strategies and future challenges of building healthy smart cities. Indoor Built Environ2020; 29(5): 639–644. DOI: 10.1177/1420326X20910408
5.
ChenWZhangNWeiJYenHLLiY. Short-range airborne route dominates exposure of respiratory infection during close contact. Build Environ2020; 176: 106859, DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106859
6.
FuLNielsenPVWangYLiuL. Measuring interpersonal transmission of expiratory droplet nuclei in close proximity. Indoor Built Environ2022; 31(5): 1306–1318. DOI: 10.1177/1420326X211029689
7.
YangXOuCYangHLiuLiSongTKangMLinHHangJ. Transmission of pathogen-laden expiratory droplets in a coach bus. J Hazard Mater2020; 397: 122609, DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122609
8.
KohanskiMALoLJWaringMS. Review of indoor aerosol generation, transport, and control in the context of COVID-19. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol2020; 10(10): 1173–1179, DOI: 10.1002/alr.22661
9.
NissenKKrambrichJAkaberiD. Long-distance airborne dispersal of SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 wards. Sci Rep2020; 10: 19589, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-76442-2
10.
LiYQianHHangJChenXChengPLingHWangSLiangPLiJXiaoSWeiJLiuLCowlingBJKangM. Probable airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in a poorly ventilated restaurant. Build Environ2021; 196: 107788, DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107788
11.
ParkSYKimYMYiSLeeSNaBJKimCBKimJIKimHSKimYBParkYHuhISKimHKYoonHJJangHKimKChangYKimILeeHGwackJKimSSKimMKweonSChoeYJParkOParkYJJeongEK. Coronavirus disease outbreak in call center. South Korea Emerging Infect Dis Journal2020; 26(8): 1666, DOI: 10.3201/eid2608.201274
12.
LiuZZhuHSongYCaoG. Quantitative distribution of human exhaled particles in a ventilation room. Build Simul2022; 15(5): 859–870, DOI: 10.1007/s12273-021-0836-1
13.
GaoNNiuJMorawskaL. Distribution of respiratory droplets in enclosed environments under different air distribution methods. Building Simulation2008; 1: 326–335.
14.
XuJFuSChaoCYH. Performance of airflow distance from personalized ventilation on personal exposure to airborne droplets from different orientations. Indoor Built Environ2021; 30(10): 1643–1653. DOI: 10.1177/1420326X20951245
15.
ZhangBGuoGZhuCJiZLinCH. Transport and trajectory of cough-induced bimodal aerosol in an air-conditioned space. Indoor Built Environ2021; 30(9): 1546–1567. DOI: 10.1177/1420326X20941166
16.
NielsenPVXuC. Multiple airflow patterns in human microenvironment and the influence on short-distance airborne cross-infection – A review. Indoor Built Environ2022; 31(5): 1161–1175. DOI: 10.1177/1420326X211048539
17.
ChillónSAUgarteAAAramendiaIGamizUFZuluetaE. Numerical modeling of the spread of cough saliva droplets in a calm confined space. Mathematics2021; 9: 574, DOI: 10.3390/math9050574
18.
WuLLiuXYaoFChenY. Numerical study of virus transmission through droplets from sneezing in a cafeteria. Phys Fluids2021; 33: 023311, DOI: 10.1063/5.0040803
19.
KhanTWithersCMartinEBonillaN. Approaches for effective negative pressure isolation space control to minimize airborne transmission of contaminants in residential homes. Indoor Built Environ2022; 31(5): 1405–1417. DOI: 10.1177/1420326X211062421
20.
LiHZhongKZhaiZ. Potential risk analysis of medical staff when performing endotracheal intubation in negative pressure isolation ward. Indoor Built Environ2022; 31(5): 1224–1233. DOI: 10.1177/1420326X20979015
21.
GeHChenLXuCCuiX. Large-eddy simulation of droplet-laden cough jets with a realistic manikin model. Indoor Built Environ2022; 31(5): 1271–1286. DOI: 10.1177/1420326X211032247
22.
AbuhegazyMTalaatKAnderogluOPorosevaSV. Numerical investigation of aerosol transport in a classroom with relevance to COVID-19. Phys Fluids2020; 32: 103311, DOI: 10.1063/5.0029118
LiYYWangJXChenX. Can a toilet promote virus transmission? From a fluid dynamics perspective. Phys Fluids2020; 32: 065107, DOI: 10.1063/5.0013318
25.
BhagatRKWykesMSDDalzielSBLindenPF. Effects of ventilation on the indoor spread of COVID-19. J Fluid Mech2020; 903: F1, DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2020.720
26.
ASHRAE. ASHRAE position document on airborne infectious diseases. Atlanta: The American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, 2020.
27.
MorawskaLTangJWBahnflethWBluyssendPMBoerstraABuonannoGCaoJDancerSFlotoAFranchimonFHaworthCHogelingJLsaxonCJimenezJLKurnitskiJLiYLoomansMMarksGMarrLCMazzarellaLMelikovAKMillerSMiltonDKNazaroffWNielsenPVNoakesCPecciaJQuerolXSekharCSeppanenOTanbeSTellierRThamKWWargockiPWierzbickaAYaoM. How can airborne transmission of COVID-19 indoors be minimized?Environ Int2020; 142: 105832, DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105832
28.
LenoirA. On comfort in tropical climates. The design and operation of net zero energy buildings. Architecture, space management. Saint-denis, réunion, université de la Réunion, 2013, https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01100526/document
29.
LiWChongAHasamaTXuLLasternasBThamKWLamKP. Effects of ceiling fans on airborne transmission in an air-conditioned space. Building Environ2021; 198: 107887, DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107887
30.
PandeyBBoharaBPungaliyaRPatwardhanSCBanerjeeR. A thermal comfort-driven model predictive controller for residential split air conditioner. J Building Eng2021; 42: 102513, DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102513
31.
WangJXCaoXChenYP. An air distribution optimization of hospital wards for minimizing cross-infection. J Clean Prod2021; 279: 123431, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123431
32.
PandeyBSharmaABanerjeeR. Prediction of improved occupant's thermal comfort with ceiling fan through coupled energy simulation and computational fluid dynamics. Chicago, IL: ASHRAE/IBPSA-USA Bldg Simulation Conf, 2018, pp. 26–28.
33.
ANSYS Inc. ANSYS CFX-Solver Theory Guide, Cambridge: Release, 2015.
34.
MenterFR. Zonal two equation k-ω turbulence models for aerodynamic flows. AIAA 93-2906, 24th Fluid Dynamics Conference 1993, Orlando, FL, 1993, pp. 6–9. DOI: 10.2514/6.1993-2906
35.
DboukTDrikakisD. On coughing and airborne droplet transmission to humans. Phys Fluids2020a; 32: 053310, DOI: 10.1063/5.0011960
36.
AllenMDRaabeOG. Slip Correction Measurements of Spherical Solid Aerosol Particles in an Improved Millikan Apparatus. Aerosol Sci Tech1985; 4(3): 269–286, DOI: 10.1080/02786828508959055
37.
VesilindPA. The Rosin-Rammler particle size distribution, Resource Recovery and Conservation. Resource Recovery and Conservation1980; 5(3): 275–277, DOI: 10.1016/0304-3967(80)90007-4
38.
ShangYTaoYDongJHeFTuJ. Deposition features of inhaled viral droplets may lead to rapid secondary transmission of COVID-19. J Aerosol Sci2021; 154: 105745, DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105745
39.
DuWIacovielloFFernandezTLoureiroRBrettDJLShearingPR. Microstructure analysis and image-based modelling of face masks for COVID-19 virus protection. Commun Mater2021; 2: 69, DOI: 10.1038/s43246-021-00160-z
40.
CrawleyDBLawrieLKWinkelmannFCBhulWFHuangYJPedersenCOStrandRKLiesenRJFisherDEWitteMJGlazerJ. EnergyPlus: creating a new-generation building energy simulation program. Energy and Buildings2001; 33(4): 319–331, DOI: 10.1016/S0378-7788(00)00114-6
41.
KwonSBParkJJangJChoYParkDSKimCBaeGNJangA. Study on the initial velocity distribution of exhaled air from coughing and speaking. Chemosphere2012; 87: 1260–1264, DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.01.032
42.
ChenHLLiCPTangCSLungSCCChuangHCChouDWChangLT. Risk assessment for people exposed to PM2.5 and constituents at different vertical heights in an urban area of Taiwan. Atmosphere2020; 11(11): 1145.
43.
BoonglaYChanonmuangPHataMFuruuchiMPhairuangW. The characteristics of carbonaceous particles down to the nanoparticle range in Rangsit city in the Bangkok Metropolitan Region, Thailand. Environ Pollut2021; 272: 115940.
44.
TellierRLiYGCowlingBJTangJW. Recognition of aerosol transmission of infectious agents: a commentary. BMC Infect Dis2019; 19: 101.
45.
KlompasMBakerMARheeC. Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: theoretical considerations and available evidence. JAMA2020; 324(5): 441–442. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.12458
46.
PratherKAWangCCSchooleyRT. Reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Science2020; 368(6498): 1422–1424.
47.
FennellyKP. Particle sizes of infectious aerosols: implications for infection control. Lancet Respir Med2020; 8(9): 914–924, DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30323-4
IssakhovAZhandauletYOmarovaPAlimbekABorsikbayevaAMustafayevaA. A numerical assessment of social distancing of preventing airborne transmission of COVID-19 during different breathing and coughing processes. Sci Rep2021; 11: 9412, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-88645-2
50.
MomoiYSagaraKYamanakaTKotaniH. Modeling of ceiling fan based on velocity measurement for CFD simulation of airflow in large room. In: RoomVent 2004: Proceedings of 9th international conference on air distribution in rooms, Coimbra, Portugal, 5–8 September 2004, pp. 145–150.
51.
DuguidJ. The size and the duration of air-carriage of respiratory droplets and droplet-nuclei. Epidemiol Infection1946; 44(6): 471–479, DOI: 10.1017/S0022172400019288
52.
PendarMRPáscoaJC. Numerical modeling of the distribution of virus carrying saliva droplets during sneeze and cough. Phys Fluids2020; 32: 083305, DOI: 10.1063/5.0018432
53.
DasSK. V. Transmission of airborne virus through sneezed and coughed droplets. Phys Fluids2020; 32: 097102, DOI: 10.1063/5.0022859
54.
LieberCMelekidisSKochRBauerHJ. Insights into the evaporation characteristics of saliva droplets and aerosols: Levitation experiments and numerical modeling. J Aerosol Sci2021; 154: 105760, DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105760
55.
YamakawaMKitagawaAOguraKChungYMKimM. Computational investigation of prolonged airborne dispersion of novel coronavirus-laden droplets. J Aerosol Sci2021; 155: 105769, DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105769
56.
FengYMarchalTSperryTYiH. Influence of wind and relative humidity on the social distancing effectiveness to prevent COVID-19 airborne transmission: A numerical study. J Aerosol Sci2020; 147: 105585, DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2020.105585
57.
IshakMHHIsmailFChangWSAzizMSA. Effect of relative humidity and wind on the human sneezing to prevent virus transmission: A numerical approach. Aerosol Sci Tech2021; 56: 8. DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2021.1990848
58.
WangHLiZZhangXZhuLLiuYWangS. The motion of respiratory droplets produced by coughing. Phys Fluids2020; 32: 125102, DOI: 10.1063/5.0033849
59.
BhardwajRAgrawalA. Likelihood of survival of coronavirus in a respiratory droplet deposited on a solid surface. Phys Fluids2020; 32(6): 061704, DOI: 10.1063/5.0012009
60.
ZhuSKatoSYangJH. Study on transport characteristics of saliva droplets produced by coughing in a calm indoor environment. Build Environ2006; 41(12): 1691–1702, DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.06.024
61.
MoghadasSMFitzpatrickMCSahPPandeyAShoukatASingerBHGalvaniAP. The implications of silent transmission for the control of COVID-19 outbreaks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2020; 117(30): 17513–17515.
62.
JohanssonMAQuandelacyTMKadaSPrasadPVSteeleMBrooksJTSlaytonRBBiggerstaffMButlerJC. SARS-CoV-2 transmission from people without COVID-19 symptoms. JAMA Netw Open2021; 4(1): 2035057.
63.
KumarSLeeHP. The perspective of fluid flow behavior of respiratory droplets and aerosols through the facemasks in context of SARS-CoV-2. Phys Fluids2020; 32: 111301, DOI: 10.1063/5.0029767.
64.
AliyuAMSinghDUzokaCMishraR. Dispersion of virus-laden droplets in ventilated rooms: Effect of homemade facemasks. J Building Eng2021; 44: 102933.
65.
DboukTDrikakisD. On respiratory droplets and face masks. Phys Fluids2020; 32: 063303, DOI: 10.1063/5.0015044.
66.
DrewnickFPikmannJFachingerFMoormannLSprangFBorrmannS. Aerosol filtration efficiency of household materials for homemade face masks: Influence of material properties, particle size, particle electrical charge, face velocity, and leaks. Aerosol Sci Tech2021; 55(1): 63–79. DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2020.1817846
67.
LindsleyWGBlachereFMLawBFBeezholdDHNotiJD. Efficacy of face masks, neck gaiters and face shields for reducing the expulsion of simulated cough-generated aerosols. Aerosol Sci Tech2021; 55(4): 449–457. DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2020.1862409
68.
KaruppasamyKObuchowskiN. Comparison of fit for sealed and loose-fitting surgical masks and N95 filtering facepiece respirators. Ann Work Expo Health2021; 65: 463–474. DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxaa125
69.
López‐RebollarBMPosadas‐BejaranoAGarcía‐PulidoDTorres‐MayaADíaz‐DelgadoC. Proposal of a mask and its performance analysis with CFD for an enhanced aerodynamic geometry that facilitates filtering and breathing against COVID‐19. Fluids2021; 6: 408, DOI: 10.3390/fluids6110408
70.
MacIntyreCRChughtaiAA. A rapid systematic review of the efficacy of face masks and respirators against coronaviruses and other respiratory transmissible viruses for the community, healthcare workers and sick patients. Int. J. Nurs. Stud2020; 1: 103629.
71.
SugimuraMChimed-OchirOYumiyaYOhgeHShimeNSakaguchiTTanakaJTakafutaTMimoriMKuwabaraMAsaharaTKishitaEKuboT. The association between wearing a mask and COVID-19. Int J Environ Res Public Health2021; 18: 9131. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18179131
72.
WangYTianHZhangLZhangMGuoDWuWZhangXKanGLJiaLHuoDLiuBWangXSunYWangQYangPMacIntyreCR. Reduction of secondary transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in households by face mask use, disinfection and social distancing: a cohort study in Beijing, China. BMJ Glob Health2020; 5(5): 002794.
73.
NelsonSBDugdaleCMBilinskiACosarDPollockNRCiaranelloA. Prevalence and risk factors for in-school transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in Massachusetts K-12 public schools, 2020-2021. medRxiv, 2021. DOI: 10.1101/2021.09.22.21263900
74.
Doung-NgernPSuphanchaimatRPanjangampatthanaAJanekrongthamCRuampoomDDaochaengNEungkanitNPisitpayatNSrisongNYasopaOPlernpromPPromduangsiPKumphonPSuangthoPWatakulsinPChaiyaSKripattanapongSChantianTBlossENamwatCLimmathurotsakulD. Case-control study of use of personal protective measures and risk for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 infection, Thailand. Emerg Infect Dis2020; 26(11): 2607–2616.
75.
BudzynSEPanaggioMJParksSEPapazianMMagidJEngMBarriosLC. Pediatric COVID-19 cases in counties with and without school mask requirements — United States, July 1–September 4, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep2021; 70(39): 1377–1378.
76.
ObergTBrosseauLM. Surgical Mask Filter and Fit Performance. Am J Infect Control2008; 36: 276–282. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2007.07.008
77.
BourouibaL. Turbulent gas clouds and respiratory pathogen emissions: potential implications for reducing transmission of COVID-19. JAMA2020; 323(18): 1837–1838. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.4756
78.
FengXLShaoLYXiCXJonesTZhangDZBérubéK. Particle-induced oxidative damage by indoor size-segregated particulate matter from coal-burning homes in the Xuanwei lung cancer epidemic area, Yunnan Province, China. Chemosphere2020; 256: 127058.
79.
HarperGJMortonJD. The respiratory retention of bacterial aerosols: experiments with radioactive spores. J Hyg1953; 51: 372–385.
80.
LindsleyWGBlachereFMThewlisREVishnuADavisKACaoGPalmerJEClarkKEFisherMAKhakooRBeezholdDH. Measurements of airborne influenza virus in aerosol particles from human coughs. PLoS One2010; 5(11): 15100.
81.
AsadiSWexlerASCappaCDBarredaSBouvierNMRistenpartWD. Aerosol emission and superemission during human speech increase with voice loudness. Sci Rep2019; 9: 2348.
82.
LiuYNingZChenYGuoMLiuYLGaliNKSunLDuanYSCaiJWesterdahlDLiuXJXuKHoKFKanHDFuQYLanK. Aerodynamic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 in two Wuhan hospitals. Nature2020; 582(7813): 557.
83.
KonstantinoudisGPadelliniTBennettJEDaviesBEzzatiMBlangiardoM. Long-term exposure to air-pollution and COVID-19 mortality in England: a hierarchical spatial analysis. Environ Int2020; 146: 106316.
84.
Bilal BashirMFBenghoulMNumanUShakoorAKomalBBashirMABashirMTanD. Environmental pollution and COVID-19 outbreak: insights from Germany. Air Qual Atmos Health2020; 13(11): 1385–1394.
85.
DanieleFFrancescoR. Role of the chronic air pollution levels in the COVID-19 outbreak risk in Italy. Environ Pollut2020; 264: 114732.
86.
ZoranMASavastruRSSavastruDMTautanMN. Assessing the relationship between surface levels of PM2.5 and PM10 particulate matter impact on COVID-19 in Milan, Italy. Sci. Total Environ2020; 738: 139825.
87.
CzwojdzińskaMTerpińskaMKuźniarskiAPłaczkowskaSPiwowarA. Exposure to PM2.5 and PM10 and COVID-19 infection rates and mortality: A one-year observational study in Poland. Biomed J2021; 44(61): S25–S36, doi:10.1016/j.bj.2021.11.006
88.
MeoSAAbukhalafAAAlomarAAAlessaOMSamiWKlonoffDC. Effect of environmental pollutants PM2.5, carbon monoxide, and ozone on the incidence and mortality of SARS-CoV-2 infection in ten wildfire affected counties in California. Sci Total Environ2021; 757: 143948.
89.
MiltonDKFabianMPCowlingBJGranthamMMcDevittJJ. Influenza virus aerosols in human exhaled breath: particle size, culturability, and effect of surgical masks. Plos Pathog2013; 9(3): 1003205, DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003205
90.
ShiuEYCHuangWYeDXieYMoJLiYCowlingBJYangZLeungNHL. Frequent recovery of influenza A but not influenza B virus RNA in aerosols in pediatric patient rooms. Indoor Air2020; 30(5): 805–815.
91.
FennellyKPJones-LopezECAyakakaIKimSMenyhaHKirengaBMuchwaCJolobaMDryden-PetersonSReilyNOkweraAElliottAMSmithPGMugerwaRDEisenachKDEllnerJJ. Variability of infectious aerosols produced during coughing by patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med2012; 186: 450–457.
92.
TangSMaoYJonesRMTanQJiJSLiNShenJLvYPanLDingPWangXWangYMacIntyreCRShiX. Aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2? Evidence, prevention and control. Environ Int2020; 144: 106039.
93.
ZhouJWeiJChoyKTSiaSFRowlandsDKYuDWuCYLindsleyWGCowlingBJMcDevittJPeirisMLiYYenHL. Defining the sizes of airborne particles that mediate influenza transmission in ferrets Proc. Natl Acad Sci Unit States Am2018; 115(10): 2386–2392.
94.
TheronGLimberisJVenterRSmithLPietersenEEsmailACalligaroGRieleJTKockMDHeldenPVGumboTClarkTGFennellyKWarrenRDhedaK. Bacterial and host determinants of cough aerosol culture positivity in patients with drug-resistant versus drug-susceptible tuberculosis. Nat Med2020; 26: 1435–1443, DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-0940-2
95.
WainwrightCEFranceMWO'RourkePAnujSKiddTJNissenMDSlootsTPCoulterCRistovskiZHargreavesMRoseBRHarbourCBellSCFennellyKP. Cough-generated aerosols of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other Gram-negative bacteria from patients with cystic fibrosis. Thorax2009; 64(11): 926–931. DOI: 10.1136/thx.2008.112466
96.
MorrisNBChaselingGKEnglishTGrussFMaideenMFBCaponAJayO. Electric fan use for cooling during hot weather: A biophysical modelling study. Lancet Planet Health2021; 5(6): 368–377.
97.
Centre for Disease Control and Prevention. Ventilation in buildings. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/ventilation.html#:∼:text=Can_fans_be_used_to,list_of_ventilation_improvement_considerations (accessed 1 December 2022).
98.
AyasreeTKJinshahBSSrinivasT. The effect of opening windows on the airflow distribution inside naturally ventilated residential bedrooms with ceiling fans. Building Serv Eng Res Tech2022; 43(1): 23–39. DOI: 10.1177/01436244211024084.
99.
ANSI/ASHRAE 55-2013. Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. Atlanta, GA, US: American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers, 2013.
100.
ChuDKAklEADudaSSoloKYaacoubSSchünemannHJHarakehAEBognanniALotfiTLoebMHajizadehABakAIzcovichAGarciaCACChenCHarrisDJBorowiackEChamseddineFSchünemannFMorganoGPSchünemannGEUMChenGZhaoHNeumannIChanJKhabsaJHneinyLHarrisonLSmithMRizkNRossiPGHannaPAEl-khouryRStalteriRBaldehTPiggottTZhangYSaadZKhamisAReinapMDudaSSoloKYaacoubSSchünemannHJ. Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet2020; 395(10242): 1973–1987, DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31142-9
101.
VosJD. The effect of COVID-19 and subsequent social distancing on travel behavior. Transportation Res Interdiscip Perspect2020; 5: 100121, DOI: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100121
102.
LiuDDingWDongZSPedryczW. Optimizing deep neural networks to predict the effect of social distancing on COVID-19 spread. Comput Ind Eng2022; 166: 107970, DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2022.107970
103.
ThuTPBNgocPNHHaiNMTuanLA. Effect of the social distancing measures on the spread of COVID-19 in 10 highly infected countries. Sci Total Environ2020; 742: 140430, DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140430
104.
XiaoTMuTShenSSongYYangSHeJ. A dynamic physical-distancing model to evaluate spatial measures for prevention of Covid-19 spread. Physica A: Stat Mech Its Appl2022; 592: 126734, DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2021.126734
105.
ParisiDRSocial distance characterization by means of pedestrian simulation. arXiv:2009.04019 [physics.soc-ph], DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2009.04019
106.
KohWNaingLWongJ. Estimating the impact of physical distancing measures in containing COVID-19: an empirical analysis. Int J Infect Dis2020; 100: 42–49.
107.
CowlingBAliSNgYTsangTLiJFongMLiaoQKwanMLeeSChiuSWuJWuPLeungG. Impact assessment of non-pharmaceutical interventions against coronavirus disease 2019 and influenza in Hong Kong: an observation study. Lancet Public Health2020; 5(5): 279–288.
108.
KamgaCEickemeyerP. Slowing the spread of COVID-19: Review of “Social distancing” interventions deployed by public transit in the United States and Canada. Transport Policy2021; 106: 25–36, DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.03.014
109.
ChenYHFangCTHuangYL. Effect of Non-lockdown Social Distancing and Testing-Contact Tracing During a COVID-19 Outbreak in Daegu, South Korea, February to April 2020: A Modeling Study. Int J Infect Dis2021; 110: 213–221, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.07.058
110.
UgailHAggarwalRIglesiasAHowardNCampuzanoASuárezPMaqsoodMAadilFMehmoodIGleghornSTaifKKadrySMuhammadK. Social distancing enhanced automated optimal design of physical spaces in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainable Cities Soc2021; 68: 102791, DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102791
111.
DaoHTKimKS. Behavior of cough droplets emitted from Covid-19 patient in hospital isolation room with different ventilation configurations. Building Environ2022; 209: 108649, DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108649
112.
SrivastavaSZhaoXManayAChenQ. Effective ventilation and air disinfection system for reducing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection risk in office buildings. Sustainable Cities Soc2021; 75: 103408, DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103408
113.
BazantMZBushJWM. A guideline to limit indoor airborne transmission of COVID-19. Proc Natl Acad Sci Unit States Am2021; 118(17): 2018995118.
114.
BerryGParsonsAMorganMRickertJChoH. A review of methods to reduce the probability of the airborne spread of COVID-19 in ventilation systems and enclosed spaces. Environ Res2022; 203: 111765, DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111765
115.
LiCTangH. Study on ventilation rates and assessment of infection risks of COVID-19 in an outpatient building. J Building Eng2021; 42: 103090, DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103090
116.
MotamediHShirzadiMTominagaYMirzaeiPA. CFD modeling of airborne pathogen transmission of COVID-19 in confined spaces under different ventilation strategies. Sustainable Cities Soc2022; 76: 103397, DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103397
117.
BarrioAMRastrolloMBOyareguiSDMartínezPGCalvoNMHernándezDLRamosAAOstizAS. Encouraging natural ventilation to improve indoor environmental conditions at schools. Case studies in the north of Spain before and during COVID. Energy and Buildings2022; 254: 111567, DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111567
118.
ElsaidAMAhmedMS. Indoor air quality strategies for air-conditioning and ventilation systems with the spread of the global coronavirus (COVID-19) epidemic: Improvements and recommendations. Environ Res2021; 199: 111314, DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111314
119.
BeaussierMVanoliEZadeganFPerayHBezianEJilesenJGandveauGGayraudJM. Aerodynamic analysis of hospital ventilation according to seasonal variations. A simulation approach to prevent airborne viral transmission pathway during Covid-19 pandemic. Environ Int2022; 158: 106872, DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106872
120.
ParkSChoiYSongDKimEK. Natural ventilation strategy and related issues to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) airborne transmission in a school building. Sci Total Environ2021; 789: 147764, DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147764
121.
LipinskiTAhmadDSereyNJouharaH. Review of ventilation strategies to reduce the risk of disease transmission in high occupancy buildings. Int J Thermofluids2020; 7(8): 100045, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijft.2020.100045
122.
LeeJParkSHSungGBAnIHLeeKRHongSPYookSJKooHB. Effect of air cleaner on reducing concentration of indoor-generated viruses with or without natural ventilation. Aerosol Sci Tech2021; 55(11): 1288–1303. DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2021.1945528
123.
BurridgeHCBhagatRKStettlerMEJKumarPDe MelIDemisPHartAJohnson-LlambiasYKingMFKlymenkoOMcMillanAMorawieckiPPenningtonTShortMSykesDTrinhPHWilsonSKWongCWraggHDavies WykesMSIddonCWoodsAWMingottiNBhamidipatiNWoodwardHBeggsCDaviesHFitzgeraldSPainCLindenPF. The ventilation of buildings and other mitigating measures for COVID-19: A focus on wintertime. Proc Math Phys Eng Sci2021; 477(2247): 20200855. DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2020.0855
124.
ZhouQQianHLiuL. Numerical investigation of airborne infection in naturally ventilated hospital wards with central-corridor type. Indoor Built Environ2018; 27(1): 59–69. DOI: 10.1177/1420326X16667177
125.
JeongDYiHParkJ-HParkHWParkK. A vertical laminar airflow system to prevent aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in building space: Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and experimental approach. Indoor Built Environ2022; 31(5): 1319–1338. DOI: 10.1177/1420326X211063422
126.
ZhengLChenQXuJWuF. Evaluation of intervention measures for respiratory disease transmission on cruise ships. Indoor Built Environ2016; 25(8): 1267–1278. DOI: 10.1177/1420326X15600041
127.
WanMPChaoCYH. Transport characteristics of expiratory droplets and droplet nuclei in indoor environments with different ventilation airflow patterns. ASME2007; 129(3): 341–353, DOI: 10.1115/1.2720911
128.
MirikarDPalanivelSArumuruV. Droplet fate, efficacy of face mask, and transmission of virus-laden droplets inside a conference room. Phys Fluids2021; 33: 065108, DOI: 10.1063/5.0054110
129.
BurridgeHCFanSJonesRLNoakesCJLindenPF. Predictive and retrospective modelling of airborne infection risk using monitored carbon dioxide. Indoor Built Environ2022; 31(5): 1363–1380. DOI: 10.1177/1420326X211043564
130.
CraveroCMarsanoD. Simulation of COVID-19 indoor emissions from coughing and breathing with air conditioning and mask protection effects. Indoor Built Environ2022; 31(5): 1242–1261. DOI: 10.1177/1420326X211039546
131.
YeJLinCLiuJAiZZhangG. Systematic summary and analysis of Chinese HVAC guidelines coping with COVID-19. Indoor Built Environ2022; 31(5): 1176–1192. DOI: 10.1177/1420326X211061290
132.
HarmonMLauJ. The Facility Infection Risk EstimatorTM: A web application tool for comparing indoor risk mitigation strategies by estimating airborne transmission risk. Indoor Built Environ2022; 31(5): 1339–1362. DOI: 10.1177/1420326X211039544
133.
GuoMXuPXiaoTHeRDaiMMillerSL. Review and comparison of HVAC operation guidelines in different countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. Building Environ2021; 187: 107368.
134.
MohamadABurcinBGSimiHZhengONGiuliaPJinWTeresaW. Ten questions concerning occupant health in buildings during normal operations and extreme events including the COVID-19 pandemic. Building Environ2021; 188: 107480, DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107480
135.
ZhengWHuJWangZLiJFuZLiHJuraszJChouSKYanJ. COVID-19 Impact on Operation and Energy Consumption of Heating, Ventilation and Air-Conditioning (HVAC) Systems. Adv Appl Energ2021; 3: 100040, DOI: 10.1016/j.adapen.2021.100040
136.
KrartiMAldubyanM. Review analysis of COVID-19 impact on electricity demand for residential buildings. Renew Sustainable Energ Rev2021; 143: 110888, DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.110888
137.
DingJYuCWCaoS-J. HVAC systems for environmental control to minimize the COVID-19 infection. Indoor Built Environ2020; 29(9): 1195–1201. DOI: 10.1177/1420326X20951968.
138.
WangYQiaoFZhouFYuanY. Surface distribution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in Leishenshan Hospital in China. Indoor Built Environ2022; 31(5): 1193–1201. DOI: 10.1177/1420326X20942938
