Traditional lightweight building envelopes with constant thermal properties are of small heat capacity and large thermal resistance. Lightweight building envelopes with variable thermal conductivity and variable equivalent specific heat capacity can promote passive solar heat gain for clean heating and improve the indoor thermal environment in winter. In this paper, a real-scale lightweight solar house integrated with flat gravity-assisted heat pipes and PCM (phase change material) was built up, and the indoor heating effects of four forms of the solar house were experimentally studied. The results showed that (1) the heat pipes efficiently transferred solar heat absorbed by the exterior surface of the south envelope into the indoor environment during the day and increased the average daytime indoor air temperature by 3.8°C, but this benefit was not proportional to the area of heat pipes. (2) The PCM effectively stored solar energy during the day and released heat to the indoor environment at night, and the daily range of indoor air temperature was reduced by 8.7°C, with only 81% mass and 33% volume of concrete block, respectively. (3) The solar house increased the effective proportion of solar energy for indoor heating from 8.7% to 57.5% in the form of DHP + PCM house.
YanDHongTDongBMahdaviAD’OcaSGaetaniIFengX. IEA EBC Annex 66: definition and simulation of occupant behavior in buildings. Energy and Buildings2017; 156: 258–270.
2.
THUBERC. Annual report on china building energy efficiency. 1st ed.. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2021, p. 29.
3.
WangTFolienteGSongXXueJFangD. Implications and future direction of greenhouse gas emission mitigation policies in the building sector of China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2014; 31: 520–530.
4.
LuoAXiaJ. Policy on energy consumption of district heating in northern China: historical evidence, stages, and measures. J Clean Prod2020; 256: 120265.
5.
ShuklaAKSudhakarKBaredarPMamatR. BIPV based sustainable building in South Asian countries. Solar Energy2018; 170: 1162–1170.
6.
GirardAMuneerTCaceresG. A validated design simulation tool for passive solar space heating: results from a monitored house in West Lothian, Scotland. Indoor Built Environ2014; 23: 353–372.
7.
LiJHuangJ. The expansion of China’s solar energy: challenges and policy options. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2020; 132: 110002.
8.
GondalIASyed AtharMKhurramM. Role of passive design and alternative energy in building energy optimization. Indoor Built Environ2021; 30: 278–289.
9.
LongLYeHLiuM. A new insight into opaque envelopes in a passive solar house: properties and roles. Appl Energy2016; 183: 685–699.
10.
Fernández-GonzálezA. Analysis of the thermal performance and comfort conditions produced by five different passive solar heating strategies in the United States Midwest. Solar Energy2007; 81: 581–593.
11.
JiangFWangXZhangY. Analytical optimization of specific heat of building internal envelope. Energy Convers Manag2012; 63: 239–244.
12.
WangXSunXYuCWF. Building envelope with variable thermal performance: opportunities and challenges. Indoor Built Environ2018; 27: 729–733.
13.
LinZH. Research on Design Strategy of Building Envelope for Nearly Zero Energy Oriented Lightweight Prefabricated Building. PhD Thesis. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2018.
14.
KamaliMHewageK. Life cycle performance of modular buildings: a critical review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2016; 62: 1171–1183.
15.
Sage-LauckJSSailorDJ. Evaluation of phase change materials for improving thermal comfort in a super-insulated residential building. Energy Build2014; 79: 32–40.
16.
FigueiredoAFigueiraJVicenteRMaioR. Thermal comfort and energy performance: sensitivity analysis to apply the Passive House concept to the Portuguese climate. Build Environ2016; 103: 276–288.
17.
ArkarCŠukljeTVidrihBMedvedS. Performance analysis of a solar air heating system with latent heat storage in a lightweight building. Appl Therm Eng2016; 95: 281–287.
18.
HenryAPrasherRMajumdarA. Five thermal energy grand challenges for decarbonization. Nat Energy2020; 5: 635–637.
19.
WangXChengRZengRZhangY. Ideal thermal physical properties of building wall in an active room. Indoor Built Environ2014; 23: 839–853.
20.
WangXZhangYXiaoWZengRZhangQDiH. Review on thermal performance of phase change energy storage building envelope. Sci Bull2009; 54: 920–928.
21.
YuSLiuYWangDBahajASWuYLiuJ. Review of thermal and environmental performance of prefabricated buildings: implications to emission reductions in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2021; 137: 110472.
22.
XuLDaiLYinLSunXXuWYangRWangXZhangY. Research on the climate response of variable thermo-physical property building envelopes: a literature review. Energy Build2020; 226: 110398.
23.
ZhangYZhangYWangXChenQ. Ideal thermal conductivity of a passive building wall: determination method and understanding. Appl Energy2013; 112: 967–974.
24.
KishoreRABianchiMVABootenCVidalJJacksonR. Enhancing building energy performance by effectively using phase change material and dynamic insulation in walls. Appl Energy2021; 283: 116306.
25.
SiPLvYRongXShiLYanJWangX. An innovative building envelope with variable thermal performance for passive heating systems. Appl Energy2020; 269: 115175.
26.
ZhangZGWuMYaoWX. Performance of the wall implanted with heat pipes on indoor thermal environment. Indoor Built Environ2022; 31:(4): 878–894.
27.
HeYKouFWangXZhuNSongYChuYShiSLiuMChenX. Hybrid model combining multivariate regression and machine learning for the rapid prediction of interior temperatures affected by thermal diodes and solar cavities. Build Environ2022; 211: 108723.
28.
SunHWuYLinBDuanMLinZLiH. Experimental investigation on the thermal performance of a novel radiant heating and cooling terminal integrated with a flat heat pipe. Energy Build2020; 208: 109646.
29.
GongQKouFSunXZouYMoJWangX. Towards zero energy buildings: a novel passive solar house integrated with flat gravity-assisted heat pipes. Appl Energy2022; 306: 117981.
30.
LiuCZhangZ. Thermal response of wall implanted with heat pipes: experimental analysis. Renew Energy2019; 143: 1687–1697.
31.
ZengRWangXDiHJiangFZhangY. New concepts and approach for developing energy efficient buildings: ideal specific heat for building internal thermal mass. Energy Build2011; 43: 1081–1090.
32.
ZhouYYuCW. The year-round thermal performance of a new ventilated Trombe wall integrated with phase change materials in the hot summer and cold winter region of China. Indoor Built Environ2019; 28: 195–216.
33.
XiaoWWangXZhangY. Analytical optimization of interior PCM for energy storage in a lightweight passive solar room. Appl Energy2009; 86: 2013–2018.
34.
JiangFWangXZhangY. A new method to estimate optimal phase change material characteristics in a passive solar room. Energy Convers Manag2011; 52: 2437–2441.
35.
WangHLuWWuZZhangG. Parametric analysis of applying PCM wallboards for energy saving in high-rise lightweight buildings in Shanghai. Renew Energy2020; 145: 52–64.
36.
BaiLXieJFaridMMWangWLiuJ. Analytical model to study the heat storage of phase change material envelopes in lightweight passive buildings. Build Environ2020; 169: 106531.
37.
ChengRWangXZhangY. Energy-efficient building envelopes with phase-change materials: new understanding and related research. Heat Transfer Eng2014; 35: 970–984.
38.
LiuCZhangZShiYDingY. Optimisation of a wall implanted with heat pipes and applicability analysis in areas without district heating. Appl Therm Eng2019; 151: 486–494.
