Thermal comfort standards are required for overall indoor satisfaction and energy conservation. Even though the lower Himalayan region of Darjeeling has seen rapid growth in population due to its temperate type of climate, and thus resulting in manifold construction of concrete buildings, very few research on the built environment are reported from the region. In this paper, the author has discussed the yearlong thermal comfort study conducted in a naturally ventilated 3-storey un-insulated concrete building located at lower Himalayan region of Darjeeling, India. The mean indoor operative temperature were 16.7°C, 19.0°C and 22.3°C, the clothing insulation were 0.94 clo, 0.78 clo and 0.57 clo and the mean Griffiths’ comfort temperature were 18.1°C, 19.6°C and 22.4°C during the cool, moderate and warm seasons, respectively. Seasonal and gender-wise differences are reported in the paper. A logistic regression is presented to show the variation of single and multiple layers of clothing used by subjects to adapt with the plummeting temperature. A modification in the comfort standards for the region with lower and upper limits as 16.2°C and 23.3°C is also proposed.
QabbalLYounsiZNajiH. An Indoor Air Quality and Thermal Comfort Appraisal in a Retrofitted University Building via Low-Cost Smart Sensor. Indoor and Built Environment, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1420326X211015717.
2.
KlepeisNENelsonWCOttWRRobinsonJPTsangAMSwitzerPBeharJVHernSCEngelmannWH. The national human activity pattern survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol2001; 11: 231–252.
3.
ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2020. Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy. Attlanta: ASHRAE, 2020.
4.
Government of India. Energy Conservation Building Code 2017 (ECBC-Commercial). New Deli: Bureau of Energy Efficiency, 2016.
5.
FangerPO. Thermal Comfort Analysis and Applications in Environmental Engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1972.
6.
ISO 7730:2005. Moderate Thermal Environment – Determination of PMV and PPD Indices and Specifications of the Conditions for Thermal Comfort. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization, 2005.
7.
HumphreysMA. Chapter 15 the dependence of comfortable temperatures upon indoor and outdoor climates. Stud Environ Sci1981; 10: 229–250.
8.
BragerGde DearRJ. Thermal adaptation in the built environment: a literature review. Energy and Buildings1998; 27: 83–96.
9.
HumphreysMANicolJF. The validity of ISO-PMV for predicting comfort votes in every-day thermal environments. Energy and Buildings2002; 34: 667–684.
10.
SinghMKMahapatraSAtreyaSK. Adaptive thermal comfort model for different climatic zones of North-East India. Appl Energ2011; 88: 2420–2428.
11.
DhakaSMathurJBragerGHonnekeriA. Assessment of thermal environmental conditions and quantification of thermal adaptation in naturally ventilated buildings in composite climate of India. Building Environ2015; 86: 17–28.
12.
FangerPOToftumJ. Extension of the PMV model to non-air-conditioned buildings in warm climates. Energy and Buildings2002; 34: 533–536.
13.
YaoRLiBLiuJ. A theoretical adaptive model of thermal comfort - adaptive predicted mean vote (aPMV). Building Environ2009; 44: 2089–2096.
14.
XuWChenXZhaoJ. An adaptive Predicted Mean Vote (aPMV) model in office. In:Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Mechanic Automation and Control Engineering. Wuhan; 26–28 June 2010, 03 August 2010, 1887–1891. DOI: 10.1109/MACE.2010.5536861.
15.
RuivoCRda SilvaMGBrodayEE. Methodology for calculating an atmospheric pressure-sensitive thermal comfort index PMVaps. Energy and Buildings2021; 240: 110887.
16.
ThapaS. Revisiting thermal comfort in the cold climate of Darjeeling, India - effect of assumptions in comfort scales. Building Environ2021; 203: 108095.
17.
HumphreysMANicolJFRoafS. Adaptive Thermal Comfort – Foundation and Analysis (Volume II). Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge Publications, 2016, p. 20.
18.
BedfordT. The Warmth Factor in Comfort at Work. London: Medical Research Council Industrial Health Board, HMSO, 1936.
19.
HumphreysMANicolJF. An investigation into thermal comfort of office workers. J Inst Heat Ventilation Eng1970; 38: 181–189.
20.
NicolJFHumphreysMA. Adaptive thermal comfort and sustainable thermal standards for buildings. Energy and Buildings2002; 34(6): 563–572.
21.
MaitiR.Physiological and subjective thermal response from Indians. Building Environ2013; 70: 306–317.
22.
DamaitiSAZakiSARijalHBWonorahardjoC. Field study on adaptive thermal comfort in office buildings in Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore and Japan during hot and humid season. Building Environ2016; 109: 208–223.
23.
LeeYYDinMFMIwaoKLeeYHAntingN. Impact of thermal behaviour of different environmental conditions on ambient environment and thermal discomfort in Malaysia. Indoor Built Environ2021; 30(4): 520–534.
24.
AndersenRVToftumJAndersenKKOlesenBW. Survey of occupant behaviour and control of indoor environment in Danish dwellings. Energy and Buildings2009; 41: 11–16.
25.
YanBMengXOuyangJLongE. Typical effects of occupants’ behaviour on indoor air-conditioned environments in the hot summer and cold winter region of China. Indoor Built Environ2021; 30(5): 606–620.
26.
LiXWangJZhangWChenM. Thermal comfort of motion and stationary states for recreational spaces of colleges and universities in the cold regions of China. Indoor Built Environ2021; 30(3): 334–346.
27.
FabozziMDamaA. Field study on thermal comfort in naturally ventilated and air-conditioned university classrooms. Indoor Built Environ2020; 29(6): 851–859.
28.
de dearRJBragerGS. Thermal comfort in naturally ventilated buildings: revisions to ASHRAE Standard 55. Energy and Buildings2002; 34(6): 549–561.
29.
EN 15251: 2012. Indoor Environmental Input Parameters for Design and Assessment of Energy Performance of Buildings Addressing Indoor Air Quality, Thermal Environment, Lighting and Acoustics. Brussels: CEN 15251 European Committee for Standardization, 2012.
30.
EN16798-1:2019. Part 1: Indoor Environmental Input Parameters for Design and Assessment of Energy Performance of Buildings Addressing Indoor Air Quality, Thermal Environment and acousticsInEnergy Performance of Buildings – Ventilation for Buildings. Brussels, Belgium: CEN, 2019.
31.
IS SP 7-NBC. National Building Code (NBC) of Inda, 2016BIS. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards, 2016.
32.
ManuSShuklaYRawalRThomasLEde DearRJ. Field studies of thermal comfort across multiple climate zones for the subcontinent: India model for adaptive comfort (IMAC). Building Environ2016; 98: 55–70.
33.
IndragantiMOokaRRijalHB. Thermal comfort in offices in India: behavioral adaptation and the effect of age and gender. Energy and Buildings2015; 103: 284–295.
34.
KumarSMathurJMathurSSinghMKLoftnessV. An adaptive approach to define thermal comfort zones on psychrometric chart for naturally ventilated buildings in composite climate of India. Building Environ2016; 109: 135–153.
35.
IndragantiMRaoKD. Effect of age, gender, economic group and tenure on thermal comfort: a field study in residential buildings in hot and dry climate with seasonal variations. Energy and Buildings2010; 42: 273–281.
36.
CenaKDaveyNErlandsonT. Thermal comfort and clothing insulation of resting tent occupants at high altitude. Appl Ergon2003; 34: 543–550.
37.
RijalHBYoshidaHUmemiyaN. Seasonal and regional differences in neutral temperatures in nepalese traditional vernacular houses. Building Environ2010; 45: 2743–2753.
38.
ShahiDKRijalHBKayoGShukuyaM. Study on wintry comfort temperature and thermal improvement of houses in cold, temperate, and subtropical regions of Nepal. Building Environ2021; 191(3): 107569. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107569.
39.
ShresthaMRijalHBKayoGShukuyaM. A field investigation on adaptive thermal comfort in school buildings in the temperate climatic region of Nepal. Building Environ2021; 190: 107523.
40.
YangLYanHXuYLamJC. Residential thermal environment in cold climates at high altitudes and building energy use implications. Energy and Buildings2013; 62: 139–145.
41.
ThapaS. Thermal comfort in high altitude Himalayan residential houses in Darjeeling, India - an adaptive approach. Indoor Built Environ2020; 29(1): 84–100.
42.
WatchmanMDemersCMHPotvinA. Biophilic school architecture in cold climates. Indoor Built Environ2021; 30(5): 585–605.
43.
ChaiyapinuntSKhampornN. Effect of solar radiation on human thermal comfort in a tropical climate. Indoor Built Environ2021; 30(3): 391–410.
44.
ISO 7243:2017. Ergonomics of the Thermal Environment – Assessment of Heat Stress Using the WBGT (Wet Bulb Globe Temperature) Index. Geneva: International Standardization Organization, 2017.
45.
d’Amboise AlfanoFRMalchaireJPalellaBIRiccioG. WBGT index revisited after 60 years of use. Ann Occupational Hygiene2014; 58(8): 955–970. DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/meu050.
46.
ISO 7726:1998. Ergonomics of the Thermal Environment – Instruments for Measuring Physical Quantities. Geneva: International Standardization Organization, 1998.
47.
McCartneyKJNicolJF. Developing an adaptive control algorithm for Europe. Energy and Buildings2002; 34(6): 623–635.
48.
NicolJFHumphreysMA. A stochastic approach to thermal comfort – occupant behaviour and energy use in buildings. ASHRAE Trans2004; 110: 554–569.
49.
d’Ambrosio AlfanoFRDell’isolaMFiccoGPalelaBIRiccioG. On the measurement of the mean radiant temperature by means of globes: an experimental investigation under black enclosure condition. Building Environ2021; 193: 107655.
50.
HumphreysMA. A simple theoretical derivation of thermal comfort conditions. J Inst Heat Ventilation Eng1970; 33: 95–108.
51.
StampSBurmanEShrubsoleCChatzidiakouLMumovicDDaviesM. Seasonal Variations and the Influence of Ventilation Rates on IAQ: A Case Study of Five Low-Energy London Apartments. Indoor and Built Environment. epubl ahead of print 26 May 2021. DOI: 10.1177/1420326X211017175.
52.
NicolJFHumpreysMA. Derivation of the adaptive equations for thermal comfort in free-running buildings in European standard EN15251. Building Environ2010; 45: 11–17.
53.
d’Ambrosio AlfanoFROlesenBWPalellaBIPepeDRiccioG. Fifty years of PMV model: reliability, implementation and design of software for its calculation, MDPI. Atmosphere2020; 11(49): 1–14.
54.
HanadaKMihiraKSatoY. Studies on the thermal resistance of men’s underwear. J Jpn Res Assoc Text, End-users1983; 24(8): 363–369.
55.
ASHRAE 1504 – TRP. Report on Manikin Measurements for ASHRAE 1504-TRP, Extension of the Clothing Insulation Database for Standard 55 and ISO 7730 to Provide Data for Non-western Clothing Ensembles, Including Data on the Effect of Posture and Air Movement on that insulation. ASHRAE 1504 – TRP Final Repor. Atlanta, ASHRAE, 2019.
56.
IndragantiMLeeJZhangHArensEA. Versatile Indian sari: clothing insulation with different drapes of typical sari ensembles. In: Proceedings of 8th Windsor Conference, “Counting the Cost of Comfort in a changing world”, Cumberland Lodge. Windsor, UK; 10–13 April 2014. London: Network for Comfort and Energy Use in Buildings,https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1wp225b2
57.
IndragantiM. Using the adaptive model of thermal comfort for obtaining indoor neutral temperature: findings from a field study in Hyderabad, India. Building Environ2010; 45: 519–536.
58.
GriffithsI. Thermal Comfort Studies in Buildings with Passive Solar Features: Field Studies 1990. Brussels: Report to the Commission of European Community. ENS35 090 UK, 1990.
59.
HumphreysMANicolJFRajaIA. Field studies of indoor thermal comfort and the progress of the adaptive approach. Adv Building Energ Res2007; 1: 55–88.
60.
ThapaS. Insights into the thermal comfort of different naturally ventilated buildings of Darjeeling, India - effect of gender, age and BMI. Energy and Buildings2019; 193: 267–288.
61.
ErlandsonTMCenaKde DearRJ. Gender differences and non-thermal factors in thermal comfort of office occupants in a hot-arid climate. Environ Ergon - Ergon Hum Comfort, Health Perform Therm Environ2005; 3: 263–268.
62.
AggelakoudisAKAthanasiouMC. Thermal comfort study of occupants in University of Patras. In: Proceedings of the International Conference “Passive and Low Energy Cooling for the Built Environment, Santorini, Greece. 19–21, May 2005, pp 263 – 268.
63.
UkaiMNobeT. Required temperature distribution based on clothing insulation and metabolic rate survey in Japan. Indoor Built Environ2020; 29(6): 775–782.
64.
TuomaalaPHolopainenRPiraKAiraksinenM. Impact of individual characteristics – such as age, gender, bmi and fitness – on human thermal sensation. In: Proceedings of the 13th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association. Chambery, France; 25–28, August2013: 2305–2310.
65.
RijalHB. Field investigation of comfort temperature and adaptive model in Japanese houses. In: PLEA2013 – Proceedings of the 29th Conference, Sustainable Architecture for a Renewable Future, Munich, Germany, 10 – 12 September 2013.
66.
ThapaSIndragantiM. Evaluation of thermal comfort in two neighboring climatic zones in Eastern India-an adaptive approach. Energy and Buildings2020; 213: 109767.
67.
LuoMXieJYanYKeZYuPWangZZhangJ. Comparing machine learning algorithms in predicting thermal sensation using ASHRAE comfort database II. Energy and Buildings2020; 210: 109776.
ShenCYuN. Study of thermal comfort in free-running buildings based on adaptive predicted mean vote. In: Proceedings of 2010 International Conference on E-Product E-Service and E-Entertainment, Henan, China, 7-9 November 2010, pp 99–103.
70.
DaiJJiangS. Passive space design, building environment and thermal comfort: a university building under severe cold climate, China. Indoor Built Environ2021; 30(9): 1323–1343. DOI: 10.1177/1420326X20939234.
