The purpose of the paper is to evaluate the shadow impact factor of buildings on building-integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) system efficiency and to determine optimal building configurations: shapes and orientation; to ensure BIPV efficiency based on the sun-shading effect. Also considered were the height, tilt angles, orientations and array spacing as well as different shapes of the podium building for BIPV system. A parametric design software called grasshopper and plug-in ladybug were used for the simulation. Model cases were built according to statistics of high-rise buildings in Shanghai. The simulation condition was based on the winter solstice of 21 December. The results show the best shapes for high-rise buildings are circle and square, to ensure the best BIPV system efficiency. The BIPV should be located on the roof and the ‘U’ type podium building is the best shape for mounting the BIPV system to provide a good sunlight exposure no matter what the high-rise building shape is. For PV panels, the best height is 0.618 m, the optimum tilt angle and array spacing is 30° and 1.214 m, respectively. The best orientation is southward followed by southeast, southwest and with the BIPV tilting upward at 30°. Therefore, to maximize the solar energy generation, architects should consider square and round high-rise buildings and ‘U’ type podiums for mounting BIPV systems in commercial complex buildings.
StephenBJamesD.Discussion of strategies for mounting photovoltaic arrays on rooftops. Sol Energy2001;
71(5): 333–338.
2.
JelleBPBreivikCRøkenesHD.Building integrated photovoltaic products: a state-of-the-art review and future research opportunities. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells2012;
100: 69–96.
3.
HagemannIB.Gebäudeintegrierte Photovoltaik: Architektonische Integration Der Photovoltaik in Die Gebäudehülle.
Köln:
Müller, 2002.
4.
YangL.Green building design building energy efficiency.
Shanghai:
Tongji Press, 2016.
5.
HenemannA.BIPV: built-in solar energy. Renew Energy Focus2008;
9: 16–19.
6.
LiXYuCWF.China’s building energy efficiency targets: challenges or opportunities?Indoor Built Environ2012;
21: 609–613.
7.
GreenMA. The future of thin film solar cells. In: Proceedings of ISES World Congress, Vol. I–Vol. V, Beijing, China, September 18–21 2007; pp. 96–101.
8.
Yogi GoswamiDZhaoY (eds). Solar energy and human settlement.
Vol I.
Heidelberg:
Springer Link, 2007, pp. 96–101.
9.
DavidSGCahenD.Fundamentals of materials for energy and environmental sustainability.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 2012, pp. 229–235.
10.
YellaAHsuanWLHoiNTYiCYChandiranAKMKhajaNEricWGDChenYYShaikMZMichaelG.Porphyrin-sensitized solar cells with cobalt (II/III)-based redox electrolyte exceed 12 percent efficiency. Science2011;
334: 629–634.
11.
FathiMAissatAAyadM.Design of building integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) and integration of photons converters. Energy Procedia2012;
18: 377–383.
12.
MyongSYSangWJ.Design of esthetic color for thin-film silicon semi-transparent photovoltaic modules. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells2015;
143: 442–449.
13.
PengCHuangYWuZ.Building-integrated photovoltaics (BIPV) in architectural design in China. Energy Build2011;
43: 3592–3598.
14.
OmerSAWilsonRRiffatSB.Monitoring results of two examples of building integrated PV (BIPV) systems in the UK. Renew Energy2003;
28: 1387–1399.
15.
YangTAthienitisAK.A review of research and developments of building integrated photovoltaic/thermal (BIPV/T) systems. Renew Sust Energy Rev2016;
66: 886–912.
16.
SantosÍPDRütherR.The potential of building-integrated (BIPV) and building-applied photovoltaics (BAPV) in single-family, urban residences at low latitudes in Brazil. Energy Build2012;
50: 290–297.
17.
DrifMMellitAAguileraJPérezPJ.A comprehensive method for estimating energy losses due to shading of GC-BIPV systems using monitoring data. Sol Energy2012;
86: 2397–2404.
18.
EkeRDemircanC.Shading effect on the energy rating of two identical PV systems on a building façade. Sol Energy2015;
122: 48–57.
19.
MirzaeiPACarmelietJ.Influence of the underneath cavity on buoyant forced cooling of the integrated photovoltaic panels in building roof: a thermography study. Prog Photovolt Res Appl2015;
23: 19–29.
20.
YooSHManzH.Available remodeling simulation for a BIPV as a shading device. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells2011;
95: 394–397.
21.
ChowTTHandJWStrachanPA.Building-integrated photovoltaic and thermal applications in a subtropical hotel building. Appl Therm Eng2003;
23: 2035–2049.
22.
YoonJHSongJLeeSJ.Practical application of building integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) system using transparent amorphous silicon thin-film PV module. Sol Energy2011;
85: 723–733.
23.
SunLHuWYuanYCaoXLeiB.Dynamic performance of the shading type building-integrated photovoltaic claddings. Procedia Eng2015;
121: 930–937.
24.
Mulcué-NietoLFMora-LópezL.Methodology to establish the permitted maximum losses due to shading and orientation in photovoltaic applications in buildings. Appl. Energy. 2015;
137: 37–45.
25.
TianWWangYRenJZhuL.Effect of urban climate on building integrated photovoltaics performance. Energy Convers Manage2007;
48: 1–8.
26.
RütherRBraunP.Energetic contribution potential of building-integrated photovoltaics on airports in warm climates. Sol Energy2009;
83: 1923–1931.
27.
Yang L, He BJ and Ye M. The application of solar technologies in building energy efficiency: BISE design in solar-powered residential buildings. Technology in Society 2014; 38: 111–118.
28.
GB 50016-2014. Code for fire protection design of tall buildings.
Beijing:
Standardization Administration of China, 2014.
29.
AhmadTThaheemMJAnwarA.Developing a green-building design approach by selective use of systems and techniques. Architect Eng Des Manag2015;
12: 1–22.
30.
HaoGJChenMB.BIPV parallel in the application and development of power station. Shanghai Shanghai Energy Saving2006;
42: 102–105.
31.
LeeYSGuerinDA.Indoor environmental quality related to occupant satisfaction and performance in LEED-certified buildings. Indoor Built Environ2009;
18: 293–300.
RoudsariMSPakMSmithA. LADYBUG: a parametric environmental plugin for grasshopper to help designers to create an environmentally conscious design. In: Proceedings of BS2013: 13th conference of international building performance simulation association, Chambéry, France, August 26–28 2013; pp. 3129–3135.
34.
WardGJ. The RADIANCE lighting simulation and rendering system. In: Proceedings of the 21st annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques, Vol 28, Orlando, FL, USA, July 24–29 1994; pp. 459–472.
35.
ReinhartCFWalkenhorstO.Dynamic RADIANCE-based daylight simulations for a full-scale test office with outer venetian blinds. Energy Build2001;
33: 683–697.
36.
YangLLiuXDQianFDuSB.Ventilation effect on different position of classrooms in ‘line’ type teaching building. J Clean Prod2019;
209: 886–902.
37.
GB/T 50378-2014. Assessment standard for green building.
Beijing:
Standardization Administration of China, 2014.
38.
GB 50180-2018. Code for urban residential areas planning & design.
Beijing:
Standardization Administration of China, 2018.
39.
CardKJamesM.Factors contributing to institutions achieving environmental sustainability. Int J Sustain High Educ2012;
13: 166–176.
