TumminiaGGuarinoFLongoSFerraroMCelluraMAntonucciV.Life cycle energy performances and environmental impacts of a prefabricated building module. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2018;
92: 272–283.
2.
KilaireAStaceyM.Design of a prefabricated passive and active double skin façade system for UK offices. J Build Eng2017;
12: 161–170.
3.
HuuhkaSKaasalainenTHakanenJHLahdensivuJ.Reusing concrete panels from buildings for building: potential in Finnish 1970s mass housing. Resourc Conserv Recycl2015;
101: 105–121.
4.
PeñalozaDErlandssonMBerlinJWålinderMFalkA.Future scenarios for climate mitigation of new construction in Sweden: effects of different technological pathways. J Clean Prod2018;
187: 1025–1035.
5.
RohaniMFanMYuC.Advanced visual techniques for modern construction management. Indoor Built Environ2014;
23: 665–674.
6.
CaoXLiXZhuYZhangZ.A comparative study of environmental performance between prefabricated and traditional residential buildings in China. J Clean Prod2015;
109: 131–143.
7.
ArslanMHKorkmazHHGulayFG.Damage and failure pattern of prefabricated structures after major earthquakes in Turkey and shortfalls of the Turkish Earthquake code. Eng Failure Anal2006;
13: 537–557.
8.
LiZShenGQXueX.Critical review of the research on the management of prefabricated construction. Habitat Int2014;
43: 240–249.
9.
JaillonLPoonCS.The evolution of prefabricated residential building systems in Hong Kong: a review of the public and the private sector. Autom Constr2009;
18: 239–248.
10.
LiuJGongEWangDTengY.Cloud model-based safety performance evaluation of prefabricated building project in China. Wireless Pers Commun2018;
3: 1–19.
WangYWangLLongEDengS.An experimental study on the indoor thermal environment in prefabricated houses in the subtropics. Energy Build2016;
127: 529–539.
13.
WangYLongEDengS.Applying passive cooling measures to a temporary disaster-relief prefabricated house to improve its indoor thermal environment in summer in the subtropics. Energy Build2017;
139: 456–464.
14.
ZalewskiLLassueSRousseDBoukhalfaK.Experimental and numerical characterization of thermal bridges in prefabricated building walls. Energy Convers Manage2010;
51: 2869–2877.
15.
CaoXLiZLiuS.Study on factors that inhibit the promotion of SI housing system in China. Energy Build2015;
88: 384–394.
16.
WangXSunXYuCWF.Building envelop with variable thermal performance: opportunities and challenges. Indoor Built Environ2018;
27: 729–733.
17.
ZhouYYuCWFZhangG.A study of heat-transfer mechanism of wallboards containing active phase change material and parameter optimization with ventilation. Appl Therm Eng2018; in press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.04.083
18.
RenGDingYZhaoZZhengJWuTTangGXuY.Recent progress in studies of climate change in China. Adv Atmos Sci2012;
29: 958–977.
19.
ZhouYZhengSChenHZhangG.Thermal performance and optimized thickness of active shape-stabilized PCM boards for side-wall cooling and under-floor heating system. Indoor Built Environ2016;
25: 1279–1295.
20.
SaikiaPAzadASRakshitD.Thermodynamic analysis of directionally influenced phase change material embedded building walls. Int J Therm Sci2018;
126: 105–117.
21.
ZhuHHongJShenGQMaoCZhangHLiZ.The exploration of the life-cycle energy saving potential for using prefabrication in residential buildings in China. Energy Build2017;
166: 561–570.
