Technical benefits relevant to the use of palm oil clinker (POC) and fuel ash (POFA) in building materials has been well documented. However, the radiological health hazards caused by the incorporation of POC and POFA as an ingredient of building materials have not been studied so far. The radioactivity levels were measured by γ-ray spectrometry using hyper-pure germanium (HPGe) detector. The activity concentration of 226Ra and 232Th in POC and POFA was found to be in the ranges of 5.56 ± 0.23 to 9.03 ± 0.21 and 4.21 ± 0.03 to 7.98 ± 0.19 Bq kg−1, respectively, and these values were lower than the world average values of 50 Bq kg−1 for building materials. The 40K value was within the range of 413.01 ± 1.78 to 604.66 ± 2.18 Bq kg−1. Several radiological parameters and hazard indices, i.e. radium equivalent activity, absorbed dose rate and annual effective dose etc. were calculated for the evaluation of the potential radiological hazards. The obtained values fall within the recommended limit set by various international organizations. Since the activity levels of 226Ra, 232Th and 40K in POC and POFA were significantly lower than the corresponding literature data for other ingredients of building materials, it indicates that POC and POFA are safe to be used in concrete construction.
SiewHSKokTTKeatTL. Oil palm biomass as a sustainable energy source: a Malaysian case study. In: International Conference on Environment 2008 (ICENV 2008): environmental management on technology towards sustainable development, School of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia, 15–17 December 2008.
2.
KanadasanJAbdul RazakH.Utilization of palm oil clinker as cement replacement material. Materials2015;
8: 8817–8838.
3.
KanadasanJRazakHA.Mix design for self-compacting palm oil clinker concrete based on particle packing. Mater Des2014;
56: 9–19.
4.
AbdullaNSulaimanF.The oil palm wastes in Malaysia. InTech2013;
3: 75–93.
5.
ZarinaYMohd Mustafa Al BakriAKamarudinHNizarKRafizaAR.Review on the various ash from palm oil waste as geopolymer material. Rev Adv Mater Sci2013;
34: 37–43.
KarimMZainMJamilMLaiF.Fabrication of a non-cement binder using slag, palm oil fuel ash and rice husk ash with sodium hydroxide. Constr Build Mater2013;
49: 894–902.
8.
KhalidNHAHussinMWMirzaJAriffinNFIsmailMALeeSNMohamedAJayaRP.Palm oil fuel ash as potential green micro-filler in polymer concrete. Constr Build Mater2016;
102: 950–960.
9.
KanadasanJRazakHA.Engineering and sustainability performance of self-compacting palm oil mill incinerated waste concrete. J Clean Prod2015;
89: 78–86.
10.
FarzadniaNNoorvandHYasinAMAzizFNA.The effect of nano silica on short term drying shrinkage of POFA cement mortars. Constr Build Mater2015;
95: 636–646.
11.
MunirA.Utilization of palm oil fuel ash (POFA) in producing lightweight foamed concrete for non-structural building material. Proc Eng2015;
125: 739–746.
12.
AhmmadRJumaatMZAlengaramUJBahriSRehmanMAHashimH.Performance evaluation of palm oil clinker as coarse aggregate in high strength lightweight concrete. J Clean Prod2016;
112: 566–574.
13.
MujahDRahmanMEZainNHM.Performance evaluation of the soft soil reinforced ground palm oil fuel ash layer composite. J Clean Prod2015;
95: 89–100.
14.
PourakbarSAsadiAHuatBBFasihnikoutalabMH.Stabilization of clayey soil using ultrafine palm oil fuel ash (POFA) and cement. Transport Geotechn2015;
3: 24–35.
15.
KhankhajeEHussinMWMirzaJRafieizonoozMSalimMRSiongSCWaridMNM.On blended cement and geopolymer concretes containing palm oil fuel ash. Mater Des2016;
89: 385–398.
16.
RanjbarNMehraliMBehniaAAlengaramUJJumaatMZ.Compressive strength and microstructural analysis of fly ash/palm oil fuel ash based geopolymer mortar. Mater Des2014;
59: 532–539.
17.
SalihMAFarzadniaNAliAAADemirbogaR.Development of high strength alkali activated binder using palm oil fuel ash and GGBS at ambient temperature. Constr Build Mater2015;
93: 289–300.
18.
IslamAAlengaramUJJumaatMZBasharII.The development of compressive strength of ground granulated blast furnace slag-palm oil fuel ash-fly ash based geopolymer mortar. Mater Des2014;
56: 833–841.
19.
TangchirapatWKhamklaiSJaturapitakkulC.Use of ground palm oil fuel ash to improve strength, sulfate resistance, and water permeability of concrete containing high amount of recycled concrete aggregates. Mater Des2012;
41: 150–157.
20.
MujahD.Compressive strength and chloride resistance of grout containing ground palm oil fuel ash. J Clean Prod2016;
112: 712–722.
ChandaraCAzizliKAMAhmadZAHashimSFSSakaiE.Heat of hydration of blended cement containing treated ground palm oil fuel ash. Constr Build Mater2012;
27: 78–81.
23.
PapadopoulosAChristofidesGKoroneosAPapadopoulouLPapastefanouCStoulosS.Natural radioactivity and radiation index of the major plutonic bodies in Greece. J Environ Radioact2013;
124: 227–238.
24.
AsaduzzamanKKhandakerMAminYMahatR.Uptake and distribution of natural radioactivity in rice from soil in north and west part of peninsular Malaysia for the estimation of ingestion dose to man. Ann Nucl Energy2015;
76: 85–93.
25.
SharmaNSinghJEsakkiSCTripathiR.A study of the natural radioactivity and radon exhalation rate in some cements used in India and its radiological significance. J Radiat Res Appl Sci2015;
9: 47–56.
26.
AlmayahiBTajuddinAJaafarM.Effect of the natural radioactivity concentrations and 226 Ra/238 U disequilibrium on cancer diseases in Penang, Malaysia. Radiat Phys Chem2012;
81: 1547–1558.
27.
AhmadNJaafarMSBakhashMRahimM.An overview on measurements of natural radioactivity in Malaysia. J Radiat Res Appl Sci2015;
8: 136–141.
28.
BrennerDJDollRGoodheadDTHallEJLandCELittleJBLubinJHPrestonDLPrestonRJPuskinJSRonESachsRKSameJMSetlowRBZaiderM.Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. Proc Natl Acad Sci2003;
100: 13761–13766.
29.
MehraR.Use of gamma ray spectroscopy measurements for assessment of the average effective dose from the analysis of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in soil samples. Indoor Built Environ2009;
18: 270–275.
30.
JibiriNAmakomC.Radiological assessment of radionuclide contents in soil waste streams from an oil production well of a petroleum development company in Warri, Niger Delta, Nigeria. Indoor Built Environ2011;
20: 246–252.
31.
TufailMAsgharM.Hazard of NORM from phosphorite of Pakistan. J Hazard Mater2010;
176: 426–433.
32.
MoraJCBaezaARoblesBSanzJ.Assessment for the management of NORM wastes in conventional hazardous and nonhazardous waste landfills. J Hazard Mater2016;
310: 161–169.
33.
SalehMARamliATAlajeramiYAliyuAS.Assessment of natural radiation levels and associated dose rates from surface soils in Pontian District, Johor, Malaysia. J Ovonic Res2013;
9: 17–27.
34.
AhmadNJaafarMAlsaffarM.Natural radioactivity in virgin and agricultural soil and its environmental implications in Sungai Petani, Kedah, Malaysia. Pollution2015;
1: 305–313.
35.
ĐuraševićMKandićAStefanovićPVukanacIŠelakBMiloševićZMarkovićT.Natural radioactivity in lignite samples from open pit mines “Kolubara”, Serbia – risk assessment. Appl Radiat Isotopes2014;
87: 73–76.
36.
AminYKhandakerMUShyenAMahatRNorRBradleyD.Radionuclide emissions from a coal-fired power plant. Appl Radiat Isotopes2013;
80: 109–116.
37.
RamliATHusseinAWMWoodAK.Environmental 238 U and 232 Th concentration measurements in an area of high level natural background radiation at Palong, Johor, Malaysia. J Environ Radioact2005;
80: 287–304.
38.
PeppasTKarfopoulosKKarangelosDRouniPAnagnostakisMSimopoulosS.Radiological and instrumental neutron activation analysis determined characteristics of size-fractionated fly ash. J Hazard Mater2010;
181: 255–262.
39.
AsaduzzamanKMannanFKhandakerMUFarookm MS, Elkezza M, Amin YM, Sharma S, and Kassim HA.
Assessment of natural radioactivity levels and potential radiological risks of common building materials used in Bangladeshi dwellings. PloS One2015;
10: 1–16
40.
RamliATApriantoroNHWagiranHWoodAKKuanLS.Health risk implications of high background radiation dose rate in Kampung Sungai Durian, Kinta District, Perak, Malaysia. GJHS2009;
1: 140–149.
41.
MuhammadBGJaafarMSRahmanAAIngawaFA.Determination of radioactive elements and heavy metals in sediments and soil from domestic water sources in northern peninsular Malaysia. Environ Monit Assess2012;
184: 5043–5049.
42.
AswoodMSJaafarMSBaukS.Assessment of radionuclide transfer from soil to vegetables in farms from Cameron highlands and Penang,(Malaysia) using neutron activation analysis. APR2013;
5: 85–92.
43.
AlmayahiBTajuddinAJaafarM.Radiation hazard indices of soil and water samples in Northern Malaysian peninsula. Appl Radiat Isotopes2012;
70: 2652–2660.
44.
ApriantoroNHRamliATSutisnaS.Activity concentration of 238U, 232Th and 40K based on soil types in Perak state, Malaysia. ESR2013;
2: 122–127.
45.
OmarM.Natural radioactivity of building materials used in Malaysia. Radit Protect Dosimet2002;
5: 347–350.
46.
TrevisiRRisicaSD’alessandroMParadisoDNuccetelliC.Natural radioactivity in building materials in the European Union: a database and an estimate of radiological significance. J Environ Radioact2012;
105: 11–20.
47.
KovlerK.Legislative aspects of radiation hazards from both gamma emitters and radon exhalation of concrete containing coal fly ash. Constr Build Mater2011;
25: 3404–3409.
48.
KovlerK.Does the utilization of coal fly ash in concrete construction present a radiation hazard?Constr Build Mater2012;
29: 158–166.
49.
TrevisiRNuccetelliCRisicaS.Screening tools to limit the use of building materials with enhanced/elevated levels of natural radioactivity: analysis and application of index criteria. Constr Build Mater2013;
49: 448–454.
50.
YusoffS.Renewable energy from palm oil – innovation on effective utilization of waste. J Clean Prod2006;
14: 87–93.
51.
RanjbarNBehniaAAlsubariBBirganiPMJumaatMZ.Durability and mechanical properties of self-compacting concrete incorporating palm oil fuel ash. J Clean Prod2016;
112: 723–730.
52.
GuptaMChauhanR.Estimation of low-level radiation dose from some building materials using gamma spectroscopy. Indoor Built Environ2012;
21: 465–473.
53.
KhandakerMJojoPKassimHAminY.Radiometric analysis of construction materials using HPGe gamma-ray spectrometry. Radiat Protect Dosimet2012;
10: 1–5.
54.
GuptaMMahurAKVarshneyRSonkawadeRVermaKPrasadR.Measurement of natural radioactivity and radon exhalation rate in fly ash samples from a thermal power plant and estimation of radiation doses. Radiat Measur2013;
50: 160–165.
55.
RahmanSRafiqueMJabbarA.Radiological hazards due to naturally occurring radionuclides in the selected building materials used for the construction of dwellings in four districts of the Punjab Province, Pakistan. Radiat Protect Dosimet2013;
153: 352–360.
56.
KobeissiMEl-SamadORachidiI.Health assessment of natural radioactivity and radon exhalation rate in granites used as building materials in Lebanon. Radiat Protect Dosimet2013;
153: 342–351.
57.
AlharbiWAlZahraniJAdelG.Assessment of radiation hazard indices from granite rocks of the southeastern Arabian Shield, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Aust J Basic Appl Sci2011;
5: 672–682.
UNSCEAR.Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. UNSCEAR 2000 report to the General Assembly, with scientific annexes.
New York:
United Nations Publication, 2000. Volume II: Effects: Annex A (41–43).
60.
El ArabiAAhmedNDinKS.Assessment of terrestrial gamma radiation doses for some Egyptian granite samples. Radiat Protect Dosimet2008;
128: 382–385.
61.
AsaduzzamanKKhandakerMAminYBradleyD.Natural radioactivity levels and radiological assessment of decorative building materials in Bangladesh. Indoor Built Environ2016;
25: 541–550.
62.
SolakSTurhanŞUğurFAGörenEGezerFYeğingilZYeğingilİ.Evaluation of potential exposure risks of natural radioactivity levels emitted from building materials used in Adana, Turkey. Indoor Built Environ2014;
23: 594–602.
63.
RighiSBruzziL.Natural radioactivity and radon exhalation in building materials used in Italian dwellings. J Environ Radioact2006;
88: 158–170.
64.
PorstendörferJ.Radon: measurements related to dose. Environ Int1996;
22: 563–583.
65.
BeretkaJMathewP.Natural radioactivity of Australian building materials, industrial wastes and by-products. Health Phys1985;
48: 87–95.
66.
GhoseSAsaduzzamanKZamanN.Radiological significance of marble used for construction of dwellings in Bangladesh. Radioprotection2012;
47: 105–118.
67.
KumariRKantKGargM.The effect of grain size on radon exhalation rate in natural-dust and stone-dust samples. Phys Proc2015;
80: 128–130.
68.
UNSCEAR. Sources and effects of ionising radiation. 1993 Report to the General Assembly, with annexes.
New York:
United Nations Publication, 1993, pp.4–13.
69.
OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development).Exposure to radiation from the natural radio-activity in building materials: report by an NEA Group of Experts, OECD, Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA).
Paris, France, 1979, pp.1–34.
70.
HassanNMMansourNFayez-HassanMFaresS. Assessment of radiation hazards due to exposure to radionuclides in marble and ceramic commonly used as decorative building materials in Egypt. Indoor and Environment 2017; 26(3): 317–326.
71.
SievertRFaillaG.recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Health Physics (England)1959;
2: 137.
72.
Radiation UNSCotEoA. Effects of ionizing radiation: report to the General Assembly, with scientific annexes.
New York:
United Nations Publications, 2008.
73.
GuptaMChauhanR.Estimating radiation dose from building materials. Iran J Radiat Res2011;
9: 187–194.
74.
ScottJA.Protection ICoR. ICRP Publication 60: 1990 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. J Nucl Med1991;
33: 421–427.
75.
AdemolaJAOnyemaUC.Assessment of natural radionuclides in fly ash produced at Orji river thermal power station, Nigeria and the associated radiological impact. Ns2014;
6: 752–759.
76.
LuXLiLYWangFWangLZhangX.Radiological hazards of coal and ash samples collected from Xi’an coal-fired power plants of China. Environ Earth Sci2012;
66: 1925–1932.
77.
TurhanŞArıkanİHKüçükcezzarR.Radiological consequences of the use of fly ash in construction sector and geotechnical applications. Indoor Built Environ2011;
20: 253–258.
78.
FengTLuX.Natural radioactivity, radon exhalation rate and radiation dose of fly ash used as building materials in Xiangyang, China. Indoor Built Environ2016;
25: 626–634.
79.
YasirMAb MajidAYahayaR.Study of natural radionuclides and its radiation hazard index in Malaysian building materials. J Radioanal Nucl Chem2007;
273: 539–541.
80.
MajidAAIsmailAFYasirMSYahayaRBahariI.Radiological dose assessment of naturally occurring radioactive materials in concrete building materials. J Radioanal Nucl Chem2013;
297: 277–284.
81.
(International Commission on Radiological Protection). 1990 Recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. publication 60 ann. ICRP 1991; 21: 1–3.
