Reverberation time and signal-to-noise ratio in classrooms are critical factors to speech intelligibility. In this study, the combined effect of reverberation time and signal-to-noise ratio on Chinese speech intelligibility of children was investigated in 28 elementary school classrooms in China. The results show that Chinese speech intelligibility scores increase with an increase of signal-to-noise ratio and the age of children, and decrease with an increase of reverberation time in classrooms. Younger children require higher signal-to-noise ratio and shorter reverberation time than older children to understand the speech. The A-weighted signal-to-noise ratio combined with a wide range of reverberation time can be used to predict speech intelligibility score and serve as a criterion for classroom design for elementary schools.
NeumanACHochbergI. Children’s perception of speech in reverberation. J Acoust Soc Am1983; 73: 2145–2149.
2.
ShieldBMDockrellJE. The effects of environmental and classroom noise on the academic attainments of primary school children. J Acoust Soc Am2008; 123: 133–144.
3.
YaculloWSHawkinsDB. Speech recognition in noise and reverberation by school-age children. Audiology1987; 26: 235–246.
4.
JohnsonCE. Children’s phoneme identification in reverberation and noise. J Speech Hear Res2000; 43: 144–157.
5.
TalaricoMAbdillaGAliferisMBalazicIGiaprakisIStefanakisTFoenanderKGraydenDBPaoliniAG. Effect of age and cognition on childhood speech in noise perception abilities. Audiol Neuro-otol2006; 12: 13–19.
6.
YangWBradleyJS. Effects of room acoustics on the intelligibility of speech in classrooms for young children. J Acoust Soc Am2009; 125: 922–933.
7.
BradleyJSSatoH. The intelligibility of speech in elementary school classrooms. J Acoust Soc Am2008; 123: 2078–2086.
8.
KlatteMLachmannTMeisM. Effects of noise and reverberation on speech perception and listening comprehension of children and adults in a classroom-like setting. Noise Health2010; 49: 270–282.
9.
AstolfiPBBarbatoG. Subjective and objective speech intelligibility investigations in primary school classrooms. J Acoust Soc Am2012; 131: 247–257.
10.
PengJYanNWangD. Chinese speech intelligibility and its relationship with the speech transmission index for children in elementary school classrooms. J Acoust Soc Am2015; 137: 85–93.
BradleyJS. Predictors of speech intelligibility in rooms. J Acoust Soc Am1986; 80: 837–845.
13.
Marshall NB. The effects of different signal-to-noise ratios on the speech recognition scores of children. PhD Disseration, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, 1987.
14.
ANSI S12.60: 2010. Acoustical performance criteria, design requirements, and guidelines for schools. Washington, DC: American National Standards Institute, 2010.
15.
GB 50118:2010. Code for design of sound insulation of civil building. Beijing, P. R. China: Standardization Administration of China, 2010.
16.
HoutgastT. The effect of ambient noise on speech intelligibility in classrooms. Appl Acoust1981; 14: 15–25.
17.
GB 4959:1985. Methods of measurement for the characteristics of sound reinforcement in auditoria. Beijing, P. R. China: Standardization Administration of China, 1985.
18.
SJ2467: 1984. Test methods for Chinese articulation in communication equipment. Beijing, P. R. China: Standardization of Ministry of Electronics and Industry, 1984.
19.
ANSI S3.2: 1989 (R1999). Measuring the intelligibility of speech over communication systems. Washington, DC: American National Standards Institute, 1999.
20.
WuSJPengJXBiZK. Chinese speech intelligibility in low frequency reverberation and noise in a simulated classroom. Acta Acust United Ac2014; 100: 1067–1072.
21.
StevensKN. Acoustic correlates of some phonetic categories. J Acoust Soc Am1980; 68: 836–842.
22.
ElliottLLHammerMAEvanKE. Perception of gated, highly familiar spoken monosyllabic nouns by children, teenagers, and older adults. Percept Psycho1987; 42: 150–157.
23.
GumenyukVKorzyukovOAlhoKEsceraCNäätänenR. Effects of auditory distraction on electrophysiological brain activity and performance in children aged 8–13 years. Psychophysiology2004; 41: 30–36.
24.
ElliottEM. The irrelevant-speech effect and children: theoretical implications of developmental change. Mem Cogn2002; 30: 478–487.
25.
WernerLA. Issues in human auditory development. J Commun Disord2007; 40: 275–283.
26.
NabelekAKRobinsonPK. Monaural and binaural speech perception in reverberation for listeners of various ages. J Acoust Soc Am1982; 71: 1242–1248.
27.
ElliottLL. Effects of noise on perception of speech by children and certain handicapped individuals. J Sound Vib1982; 71: 9–14.
28.
Finitzo-HieberTTillmanTW. Room acoustics effects on monosyllabic word discrimination ability for normal and hearing-impaired children. J Speech Hear Res1978; 21: 440–458.
29.
HodgsonMNosalEM. Effect of noise and occupancy on optimal reverberation times for speech intelligibility in classrooms. J Acoust Soc Am2002; 111: 931–939.
30.
LathamG. The signal-to-noise ratio for speech intelligibility – an auditorium acoustics design index. Appl Acoust1979; 12: 253–320.
31.
PengJJiangP. Chinese word identification and sentence intelligibility in primary school classrooms. Arch Acoust2016; 41: 213–219.
32.
AstolfiACorradoVGriginisA. Comparison between measured and calculated parameters for the acoustical characterization of small classrooms. Appl Acoust2008; 69: 966–976.
33.
ISO 9921-1:1996. Ergonomic assessment of speech communication—Part 1: speech interference level and communication distances for persons with normal hearing capacity in direct communication (SIL method). Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 1996.
