This paper investigated the effects of gender, age, seasonal differences and exposure of occupants to heat absorbed in the roof, on their thermal responses in naturally ventilated apartments. A simple linear regression was conducted to estimate the comfort temperatures and comfort range of the surveyed subjects. A year-round study, involving over 55 apartments and 71 subjects, had collated a data-set of 852 in total. The findings revealed that females are more sensitive to the environmental changes as compared to the male subjects, although both categories have shown a negligible difference in the neutral temperatures. Similarly, the elderly were found to have a narrow comfort range and high thermal sensitivity. The slope of the regression (indicating the thermal sensitivity) was observed to be higher in the summer (0.23/℃) and monsoon period (0.31/℃) and lower in the winter period (0.15/℃). The exposure to temperature near the roof was shown to have exhibited some significant impact on the thermal perception of occupants.
Lall AB. Preventive strategy for air conditioning – a case for India. In: Proceedings of Windsor conference: air conditioning and the low carbon cooling challenge, Cumberland Lodge, Windsor, UK, July 27–29 2008. NCEUB – Network for Comfort and Energy Use in Buildings, Paper No. 37, http://nceub.org.uk (accessed 5 December 2012).
6.
ZainZMTaibMNBakiSM. Hot and humid climate: prospect for thermal comfort in residential building. Desalination2007; 209: 261–268.
7.
SP 7:2016. National Building Code (NBC 2016). New Delhi, India: Bureau of Indian Standards, 2016.
8.
Pellegrino M, Simonetti M and Fournier L. A field survey in Calcutta. Architectural issues, thermal comfort and adaptive mechanisms in hot humid climates. In: Proceedings of Windsor conference: the changing context of comfort in an unpredictable world, Cumberland Lodge, Windsor, UK, April 12–15 2012. NCEUB – Network for Comfort and Energy Use in Buildings, Paper no.W1212. http://nceub.org.uk (accessed 5 December 2012).
9.
de Dear RJ, Brager GS and Cooper D. Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference (ASHRAE RP-884). Sydney, Australia: Macquarie Research Ltd.
10.
FeriadiHWongNH. Thermal comfort for naturally ventilated houses in Indonesia. Energy Build2004; 36: 614–626.
11.
LiangHHLinTPLung HwangRL. Linking occupants’ thermal perception and building thermal performance in naturally ventilated school buildings. Appl Energy2012; 94: 355–363.
12.
IndragantiM. Thermal comfort in naturally ventilated apartments in summer: findings from a field study in Hyderabad, India. Appl Energy2010; 87: 866–883.
13.
Rajasekar E and Ramachandraiah A. Adaptive comfort and thermal expectations – a subjective evaluation in hot humid climate. In: Proceedings of Windsor conference: adapting to change: new thinking on comfort, Cumberland Lodge, Windsor, UK, April 9–11 2010, http://nceub.org.uk (accessed 13 February 2013).
14.
HeidariSSharplesS. A comparative analysis of short-term and long-term thermal comfort surveys in Iran. Energy Build2002; 34: 607–614.
15.
FeriadiHWongNH. Thermal comfort for naturally ventilated houses in Indonesia. Energy Build2004; 36: 614–626.
16.
KumarSMahdaviA. Integrating thermal comfort field data analysis in a case-based building simulation environment. Build Environ2001; 36: 711–720.
17.
BragerGSde DearRJ. Thermal adaptation in the built environment: a literature review. Energy Build1998; 27: 83–96.
18.
MishraAKRamgopalM. Field studies on human thermal comfort – an overview. Build Environ2013; 64: 94–106.
19.
NicolJHumphreysM. Adaptive thermal comfort and sustainable thermal standards for buildings. Energy Build2002; 34: 563–572.
20.
PeetersLde DearRJHensenJD’haeseleerW. Thermal comfort in residential buildings: Comfort values and scales for building energy simulation. Appl Energy2009; 86: 772–780.
21.
RajaIANicolJFMcCartneyKJHumphreysMA. Thermal comfort: use of controls in naturally ventilated buildings. Energy Build2001; 33: 235–244.
22.
RijalHBTouhyOHumphreysMRajaIA. Development of adaptive algorithms for the operation of windows, fans and doors to predict thermal comfort and energy use in Pakistani buildings. ASHRAE Transact2008; 114: 555–573.
23.
LanLiLianZLiuWLiuY. Investigation of gender difference in thermal comfort for Chinese people. Eur J Appl Physiol2008; 102: 471–480.
24.
KarjalainenS. Thermal comfort and gender: a literature review. Indoor Air2012; 22: 96–109.
25.
CenaKde DearRJ. Thermal comfort and behavioural strategies in office buildings located in a hot-arid climate. J Therm Biol2001; 26: 409–414.
26.
HoofJHensenJLM. Thermal comfort and older adults. Gerontechnology2006; 4: 223–228.
27.
CollinsKJHoinvilleE. Temperature requirements in old age. Build Services Eng Res Technol1980; 1: 165–172.
28.
GAIA: Environmental Software and Services. India: Sustainable Urban Development. GAIA: A Multi-Media Tool for Natural Resources Management and Environmental Education, http://www.ess.co.at/GAIA/CASES/IND/RKE/Roorkee.html#clim (accessed 6 June 2013).
29.
Paul S and Banssal A. Climate of Chandigarh. Paryavaran-Patra, Volume 8.3.0. Envis Centre, Department of Environment, Chandigarh, 2013.
30.
IndragantiM. Using the adaptive model of thermal comfort for obtaining indoor neutral temperature: findings from a field study in Hyderabad, India. Build Environ2010; 45: 519–536.
31.
ASHRAE STANDARD 55-2010. Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc., 2010.
32.
National Climate Centre. Annual climate summary. India Meteorological Department, 2008.
33.
Bansal NK and Minke G. Climatic zones and rural housing in India. German-Indian Cooperation in Scientific Research and Technological Development. Forschungszentrum Julich GmbH, Zentralbibliothek, Julich. 1995. ISBN 9783893361625.
34.
BIS. Handbook on functional requirements of buildings (other than Industrial Buildings). New Delhi, India: Bureau of Indian Standards, 2004.
35.
NicolJFRajaIAAllaudinAJamyGN. Climatic variations in comfortable temperatures: the Pakistan projects. Energy Build1999; 30: 261–279.
36.
SharmaMRAliS. Tropical summer index d: a study of thermal comfort of Indian subjects. Build Environ1986; 21: 11–24.
37.
SinghS. Seasonal evaluation of adaptive use of controls in multi-storied apartments: a field study in composite climate of north India. Int J Sustain Built Environ2016; 5: 83–98.
38.
RijalHBYoshidaHUmemiyaN. Seasonal and regional differences in neutral temperatures in Nepalese traditional vernacular houses. Build Environ2010; 45: 2743–2753.
39.
NicolJFRajaIA. Indoor thermal comfort: the Pakistan study. Energy Sustain Develop1997; 3: 50–60.
40.
DhakaSMathurJBragerGHonnekeriA. Assessment of thermal environmental conditions and quantification of thermal adaptation in naturally ventilated buildings in composite climate of India. Build Environ2015; 86: 17–28.
41.
KumarP. Evaluation of thermal comfort of naturally ventilated university students’ accommodation based on adaptive thermal comfort model and occupant survey in composite climate. International J Architect Eng Construct2014; 3: 298–316.
42.
IndragantiM. Behavioral adaptation and the use of environmental controls in summer for thermal comfort in apartments in India. Energy Build2010; 42: 1019–1025.
43.
TylerHStefanoSAlbertoPDustinMKyleS. CBE thermal comfort tool, Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, 2013.
44.
SchiavonSLeeKH. Dynamic predictive clothing insulation models based on outdoor air and indoor operative temperatures. Build Environ2013; 59: 250–260.
45.
de DearRJBragerGS. Thermal comfort in naturally ventilated buildings: revisions to ASHRAE Standard 55. Energy Build2002; 34: 549–561.
46.
RozaAMShizgalHM. The Harris Benedict equation reevaluated: resting energy requirements and the body cell mass. Am J Clin Nutr1984; 40: 168–182.
47.
Rangsiraksa P. Thermal comfort in Bangkok residential buildings, Thailand. In: Proceedings of the 23rd conference on passive and low energy architecture (PLEA2006), Geneva, Switzerland, September 6–8 2006. Universite de Geneve. Paper No. II-54.
48.
Fishman DS and Pimbert SL. Survey of subjective responses to the thermal environment in offices. In: Proceedings of the international indoor climate symposium, Copenhagen, Denmark, 30 August–1 September 1978.
