The purpose of this paper is to investigate the influence of air diffuser’s offset ratio on air velocity and turbulence intensity distribution. Air velocity, turbulence intensity and air temperature measurements were performed in a single office full-scale room in isothermal case. Then the draught rate numbers were calculated to evaluate the discomfort due to draught using Fanger’s model. Different statistical tests were applied to evaluate the measured data. Results showed that the average of air velocity magnitude, turbulence intensity and draught rate was independent of the inlet offset ratio at ankle height. At the knee height and head height of seated and standing person, there was a polynomial connection between the average values and the inlet offset ratio. International standards recommend an average turbulence intensity of 40% to calculate draught rate. The results showed that 70%–80% of measured turbulence intensities were less than the standard value in the investigated range of inlet offset ratio. The draught at ankle height was within category C, while at knee height and head height of seated and standing person, the averaged draught rate numbers meet the category A and B and recommendation of CR 1752. Our results could help designers to calculate the average value of air velocity and turbulence intensity for room air distribution and indoor air comfort design.
Awbi H. Ventilation systems – Design and performance. Chapter 5. London: Taylor & Francis Group, 2008. ISBN 0-203-93689-2.
2.
Awbi H. Ventilation of buildings. Chapter 6. London: Spoon Press, 2003. ISBN 0-203-63447-0.
3.
Magyar T. Helyiségek légvezetési rendszerei és a hőérzeti méretezés kapcsolata. In: Ventilation Symposium, Budapest, Department of Building Service Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, May 12 1993.
4.
MagyarTGodaR. Laboratory modelling of tangential air supply system. Periodica Polytechnica Ser Mech Eng2000; 44: 207–215.
5.
MavrogianniAMumovicD. On the use of windcatchers in schools: Climate change, occupancy patterns, and adaptation strategies. Indoor Built Environ2010; 19: 340–354.
6.
FangerPOMelikovAKHanzawaH. Air turbulence and sensation of draught. Energ Build1988; 12: 21–39.
7.
HoughtenFCGutberletCWitkowskiE. Draft temperatures and velocities in relation to skin temperature and feeling of warmth. ASHRAE Trans1938; 44: 289–308.
8.
Fanger PO and Pedersen CJK. Discomfort due to air velocities in spaces. In: Proceedings of the meeting of commission B1, B2, E1 of the IIR, Belgrade, vol. 4, 1977, pp. 289–296.
9.
FangerPOBánhidiLOlesenBWLangkildeG. Comfort limits for heated ceilings. ASHRAE Trans1980; 86: 141–156.
10.
FangerPOChristensenNK. Perception of draught in ventilated spaces. Ergonomics1986; 29: 215–235.
11.
FangerPOMelikovAKHanzawaHRingJ. Turbulence and draft. ASHRAE J1989; 31: 18–25.
12.
NevinsRWardE. Room air distribution with on air distributing ceiling. ASHRAE Trans1968; 4: 123–132.
13.
NevinsRMillerPL. Analysis, evaluation and comparison of room air distribution performance. ASHRAE Trans1972; 78: 235–242.
WangYLianZLanL. The effect of turbulence intensity on local skin temperature and subjective responses to draft. Energ Build2011; 43: 2678–2683.
16.
WangYLianZBroedePLanL. A time-dependent model evaluating draft in indoor environment. Energ Build2012; 49: 466–470.
17.
KovanenKSeppänenOSirénKMajanenA. Turbulent air flow measurements in ventilated spaces. Environ Int1989; 15: 621–626.
18.
GiuliVDZecchinRCorainLSalmasoL. Measurements of indoor environmental conditions in Italian classrooms and their impact on children’s comfort. Indoor Built Environ2015; 24: 689–712.
19.
ChowWKWongLTFungWY. Field measurement of the air flow characteristics of big mechanically ventilated spaces. Build Environ1996; 31: 541–550.
20.
GriefahnBKunemCGehringU. The impact of draught related to air velocity, air temperature and workload. Appl Ergon2001; 32: 407–417.
YuanXChenQMoserASuterP. Numerical simulation of air flows in gymnasia. Indoor Built Environ1992; 1: 224–233.
23.
Goda R. Measurement and simulation of air velocity in the test room with slot ventilation. Clima2010: Sustainable energy use in building. Antalya: Paper R6-TS46-PP03, Antalya, Turkey, 9 May 2010—12 May 2010.
24.
TomasiRKrajcíkMSimoneAOlesenBW. Experimental evaluation of air distribution in mechanically ventilated residential rooms: thermal comfort and ventilation effectiveness. Energ Build2013; 60: 28–37.
25.
KrajcíkMSimoneAOlesenBW. Air distribution and ventilation effectiveness in an occupied room heated by warm air. Energ Build2012; 55: 94–101.
26.
GodaR. Turbulence intensity and air velocity characteristics in a slot ventilated space. Period Polytech Mech Eng2014; 58: 1–6.
27.
Goda R. Tartózkodási zóna huzatkomfortjának hatásvizsgálata, különös tekintettel az érintőleges légvezetési rendszerre. PhD dissertation, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Hungary, http://hdl.handle.net/10890/1324 (2014, accessed 18 March 2017).
28.
BothBSzánthóZ. Statistical investigation of different slot air-diffusers. Energy Procedia2015; 78: 1233–1238.
29.
BothBSzánthóZ. Experimental and numerical investigation of an offset jet using tangential air distribution system. Period Polytech Mech Eng2016; 60: 129–136.
30.
SchiavonSRimDPasutWNazaroffWW. Sensation of draft at uncovered ankles for women exposed to displacement ventilation and underfloor air distribution systems. Build Environ2016; 96: 228–236.
31.
WyonDP. Use of thermal manikins in environmental ergonomics. Scand J Work Environ Health1989; 15: 84–94.
32.
TanabeSArensEZhangHBaumanFSMadsenTL. Evaluating thermal environments by using a thermal manikin with controlled skin surface temperature. ASHRAE Trans1994; 100: 39–48. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/22k424vp (accessed 18 March 2017).
33.
Candas V. Use of a thermal manikin for prediction of local effects of thermal asymmetry and consequent discomfort risks. In: Nilsson H and Holmér I (eds) Proceedings of third international meeting on thermal manikin testing 3IMM, Stockholm, Sweden, 1999; pp.30.
34.
Nielsen PV. The Importance of a thermal manikin as source and obstacle in full-scale experiments. In: Nilsson H and Holmér I (eds) Proceedings of third international meeting on thermal manikin testing 3IMM, Stockholm, Sweden, October 12–13 1999; pp.89.
35.
MagyarT. Qualification of the occupied zones of different types of air supply systems on the basis of measurements. Period Polytech Mech Eng2000; 44: 217–226. http://www.pp.bme.hu/me/article/view/1443 (accessed 18 March 2017).
36.
EN 13779:2007. Ventilation for non-residential buildings. Performance requirements for ventilation and room-conditioning systems, Brussels: CEN, 2007.
37.
PD CR 1752:1999. Ventilation for buildings. Design criteria for the indoor environment. CEN Technical Report, 1999. Brussels: CEN.
38.
EN ISO 7730:2006. Ergonomics of the thermal environment. Analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria, Brussels: CEN, 2006.
39.
EN ISO 7726:2003. Ergonomics of the thermal environment – instruments for measuring physical quantities, Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2003.
40.
KeménySDeákA. Kísérletek tervezése és értékelése, Budapest: Műszaki Könyvkiadó, Hungary, 2002. ISBN: 963-16-3073-0.
41.
PoósTÖrvösM. Heat- and mass transfer in agitated, co- or counter current, conductive-convective heated drum dryer. Dry Technol2012; 30: 1457–1468.
42.
PoósTÖrvösMLegezaL. Development and thermal modelling of a new construction biomass dryer. Dry Technol2012; 31: 1919–1929.
43.
CroitoruCNastaseIBodeFMeslemADogeanuA. Thermal comfort models for indoor spaces and vehicles – current capabilities and future perspectives. Renew Sustain Energ Rev2015; 44: 304–318.
