Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2018-8
Assessment of radiation dose due to intake of uranium through groundwater and its carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks in southwest and northeast Punjab,India
This study was undertaken to assess uranium levels in drinking water along with carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks associated with its ingestion covering southwest and northeast regions of Punjab state, India. The uranium concentration in drinking water of southwest and northeast Punjab varied from 0.13 to 676 mg m−3 and 0.11 to 28.2 mg m−3 with mean values of 76.27 and 5.75 mg m−3, respectively. Thirty-five per cent (35%) of the analysed samples particularly from the southwest Punjab exceeded 60 mg m−3 Indian maximum acceptable concentration recommended by the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board, India. The measured annual effective doses ranged from 0.22 to 1136 µSv y−1 and 0.18 to 47.4 µSv y−1 for southwest and northeast Punjab, respectively. The mean hazard quotient for southwest Punjab was found to be greater than 1, indicating significant risk due to chemical toxicity of uranium which suggests the regular detailed monitoring of uranium content in groundwater samples is required from different depths following grid pattern. However, the uranium concentration with its both radiological and chemical risks in all the water samples from northeast Punjab was well below the recommended limits.
TawfiqNF. Uranium and radon concentration in ground water in Aucashat city, Iraq and the associated health effects. Adv Appl Sci Res2013; 4: 167–171.
2.
AnkeMSeeberMullerRSchaferUZerullJ. Uranium transfer in the food chain from soil to plants, animals and man. Chemie der Erde2009; 69: 75–90.
3.
LangmuirD. Uranium solution-mineral equilibria at low temperatures with applications to sedimentary ore deposits. Geochim Cosmochim Acta1978; 42: 547–569.
4.
WHO. World health organization guidelines for drinking-water quality, 4th ed. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2011.
5.
AERB. Atomic energy regulatory board. Directive for limit on uranium in drinking water, India, Mumbai: Atomic Energy Regulatory Board, 2004.
6.
BruggeDBuchnerV. Health effects of uranium: New research findings. Rev Environ Health2011; 26: 231–249.
7.
KundtMS. Martinez-Taibo C, Muhlmann MC and Furnari JC. Uranium in drinking water: effects on mouse oocyte quality. Health Physics2009; 96: 568–574.
8.
KurttioPAuvinenASalonenLSahaHPekkanenJMakelainenIVaisanenSBPenttilaIMKomulainenH. Renal effects of uranium in drinking water. Environ Health Perspect2002; 1109: 337–342.
9.
KurttioPKomulainenHLeinoASalonenLAuvinenLSahaH. Bone as a possible target of chemical toxicity of natural uranium in drinking water. Environ Health Perspect2005; 113: 68–72.
10.
LariviereDPackerAPMarroLLiCChenJCornettRJ. Age dependence of natural uranium and thorium concentrations in bone. Health Phys2007; 92: 119–126.
11.
ZamoraMLTracyBLZielinskiJMMeyerhofDPMossMA. Chronic ingestion of uranium in drinking water: a study of kidney bio effects in humans. Toxicol Sci1998; 43: 68–77.
12.
WHO. Handbook on indoor radon, Geneva: World Health Organization, 2009.
13.
BajwaBSKumarSSinghSSahooSKTripathiRM. Uranium and other heavy toxic elements distribution in the drinking water samples of SW-Punjab, India. J Radiat Res Appl Sci2017; 10: 13–19.
14.
SainiKBajwaBS. Uranium distribution study in the drinking water samples of SW Punjab, India. Adv Appl Sci Res2016; 7: 103–108.
15.
KumarATripathiRMRoutSMishraMKRaviPMGhoshAK. Characterization of groundwater composition in Punjab state with special emphasis on uranium content, speciation and mobility. Radiochim Acta2014; 102: 239–254.
16.
ShenoyNSVermaAKumarSAPandeySKumarSDReddyAVR. A comparative analysis of uranium in potable waters using laser fluorimetry and ICPMS techniques. J Radioanal Nucl Chem2012; 294: 413–417.
17.
RaniAMehraRDuggalVBalaramV. Analysis of uranium concentration in drinking water samples using ICPMS. Health Phys2013; 104: 251–255.
18.
BronzovicMMarovicG. Age-dependent dose assessment of 226Ra from bottled water intake. Health Phys2005; 88: 480–485.
19.
HDR. Human development report, Mumbai, India: National Resource Centre for Urban Poverty and all India Institute of Local Self Government, 2009.
20.
International Atomic Energy Agency. Radiation protection and safety of radiation sources: international basic safety standards. Interim Edition, General Safety Requirements Part 3, No. GSR Part 3 (Interim), Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency, 2011.
21.
US EPA. United States Environmental Protection Agency. National primary drinking water regulations, radionuclides. Final Rule, Washington, DC: US EPA, 2000.
22.
LeeJSChonHTKimKW. Human risk assessment of As, Cd, Cu and Zn in the abandoned metal mine site. Environ Geochem Health2007; 27: 185–191.
23.
Health Canada. Uranium in drinking water Document for public comment prepared by federal provincial subcommittee on drinking water, Ottawa, ON, Canada: Health Canada, 1999.
24.
US EPA. United States environmental protection agency edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. EPA 820-R-11-002. Office of Water, US EPA, Washington, DC, 2011.
25.
KumarAUshaNSawantPDTripathiRMRaj SanuSMishraMRoutSSupreetaPSinghJKumarSKushwahaHS. Risk assessment for natural uranium in subsurface water of Punjab State, India. Human Ecol Risk Assess: An Int J2011; 17: 381–393.
26.
Muhanad A, Bhalla A, Goswamy J, Kumar S, Singh G, Mehta D, Rai B, Shahi JS, Singh KP, Singh N and Srivastva. A uranium in ground water, water-logging in Malwa region. Scientific opinion & fact sheet.
27.
TripathiRMSahooSKMohapatraSLenkaPNairRNPuranikVDKumarARaviPMRoutSKarpeRMishraMKSarkarPKSharmaDNGhoshAK. A study on uranium in groundwater of Punjab. Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) Report, Mumbai: BARC, 2012.
28.
KumarARoutSNarayananUMishraMKTripathiRMSinghJKumarSKushwahaHS. Geochemical modelling of uranium speciation in the subsurface aquatic environment of Punjab State in India. J Geol Mining Res2011; 3: 137–146.
29.
PatraACMohapatraSSahooSKLenkaPDubeyJSTripathiRMPuranikVD. Age-dependent dose and health risk due to intake of uranium in drinking water from Jaduguda, India. Radiat Prot Dosim2013; 155: 210–216.
30.
GargVKYadavASinghKSinghMBishnoiMPulhaniV. Uranium concentration in groundwater in Hisar city, India. Int J Occup Environ Med2014; 4: 112–114.
31.
BabuMNSSomashekarRKKumarSAShivannaKKrishnamurthyVEappenKP. Concentration of uranium levels in ground water. Int J Environ Sci Tech2008; 5: 263–266.
32.
WHO. World Health Organization Guidelines for drinking water quality, 3rd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2003.
33.
KimYParkHKimJParkSChoBSungIShinD. Health risk assessment for uranium in Korean groundwater. J Environ Radioact2004; 77: 77–85.
34.
KumarGKaurA. Factors responsible for cancer in Bathinda: socio-economic impacts. Int J Adv Res Manage Soc Sci2014; 3: 91–103.
35.
AggarwalRManujaAdityaKSinghGPI. Pattern of cancer in a tertiary care hospital in Malwa region of Punjab, in comparison to other regions in India. J Clini Diagn Res2015; 9: 5–7.
36.
PratOVercoutertAnsoborloEFichetPPerretPKurttioPSalonenL. Uranium Speciation in drinking water from drilled wells in southern Finland and its potential links to health effects. Environ Sci Technol2009; 43: 3941–3946.
37.
IARC. Arsenic, metals, fibres and dusts. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC monograph on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Lyon, France: IARC, 2012, p.46.
38.
IARC. Overall evaluations of carcinogenicity. An updating of IARC monographs. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC monograph on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Lyon, France: IARC, 1987, p.230.
39.
IARC. Arsenic, metals, fibres and dusts. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC monograph on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Lyon, France: IARC, 2012, p.153.
40.
IARC. Arsenic, metals, fibres and dusts. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC monograph on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Lyon, France: IARC, 2012, p.141.
41.
IARC. Radiation. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC monograph on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Lyon, France: IARC, 2012, p.298.
