The purpose of this study was to investigate, in the human respiratory tract, the flow patterns and adsorption flux (deposition flux) distributions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) generated by the use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) through the application of a three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis. Two types of human respiratory tract models, which give detailed respiratory tract geometries were reproduced in this study using computed tomography data, for the CFD analysis of inhalation exposure. Complicated flow patterns, nonuniform distributions of VOC concentrations, and heterogeneous adsorption flux distributions were determined within the human respiratory tract models, and individual specificity was confirmed. The CFD simulation results of adsorption flux distributions on the epithelium tissue surfaces of airways denoted the probability distributions of inhalation exposure in respiratory tracts, and high adsorption flux sites representing ‘hot spots’ were delineated for tissue doses of VOCs generated from smoking e-cigarettes. Furthermore, dispersion and diffusion of VOCs in an indoor environment due to exhalation of the vapour phase of e-cigarette emissions were analysed by using a computer-simulated person with a numerical respiratory tract model through an integrated and contiguous analysis of inhalation and exhalation modes during e-cigarette smoking.
MurrayCJLLopezAD. Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet1997; 349(9063): 1436–1442.
2.
PetoRLopezABorehamJThunMHeathC. Mortality from smoking in developed countries 1950–2000, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
3.
Barrington-TrimisJLBerhaneKUngerJBCruzTBUrmanRChouCPHowlandSWangKPentzMAGilreathTDHuhJLeventhalAMSametJMMcConnellR. The e-cigarette social environment, e-cigarette use, and susceptibility to cigarette smoking. J Adolescent Health2016; 59(1): 75–80.
4.
ZhangYSumnerWChenDR. In vitro particle size distributions in electronic and conventional cigarette aerosols suggest comparable deposition patterns. Nicotine Tobacco Res2013; 15(2): 501–508.
5.
SchrippTMarkewitzDUhdeESalthammerT. Does e-cigarette consumption cause passive vaping?Indoor Air2013; 23: 25–31.
6.
PepperJKEmerySLRibislKMRiniCMBrewerNT. How risky is it to use e-cigarettes? Smokers’ beliefs about their health risks from using novel and traditional tobacco products. J Behav Med2015; 38: 318–326.
7.
California Department of Public Health, California Tobacco Control Program. State Health Officer’s report on e-cigarettes: A community health threat. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Public Health, 2015.
8.
VardavasCLAnagnostopoulosNKougiasMEvangelopoulouVConnollyGNBehrakisPK. Short-term pulmonary effects of using an electronic cigarette: impact on respiratory flow resistance, impedance, and exhaled nitric oxide. Chest2012; 141(6): 1400–1406.
9.
FlourisADChortiMSPoulianitiKPJamurtasAZKostikasKTzatzarakisMNWallaceHATsatsakisAMKoutedakisY. Acute impact of active and passive electronic cigarette smoking on serum cotinine and lung function. Inhal Toxicol2013; 25(2): 91–101.
10.
PearsonJLRichardsonANiauraRSValloneDMAbramsDB. E-cigarette awareness, use, and harm perceptions in US adults. Am J Public Health2012; 102(9): 1758–1766.
11.
ProtanoCVitaliM. The new danger of thirdhand smoke: why passive smoking does not stop at secondhand smoke. Environ Health Perspect2011; 119: A422–A422.
12.
HaysSMGobbellRVGanickNR. Indoor air quality, solutions and strategies, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995.
13.
KabilanSLinCLHoffmanEA. Characteristics of airflow in a CT-based ovine lung: A numerical study. J Appl Physiol2007; 102: 1469–1482.
14.
KitaokaHTakakiRSukiB. A three-dimensional model of the human airway tree. J Appl Physiol1999; 87: 2207–2217.
15.
KleinstreuerCZhangZLiZ. Modeling airflow and particle transport/deposition in pulmonary airways. Respir Physiol Neurobiol2008; 163: 128–138.
16.
LongestPWHolbrookLT. In silico models of aerosol delivery to the respiratory tract—Development and applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev2011; 64: 296–311.
17.
XiJLongestPW. Effects of oral airway geometry characteristics on the diffusional deposition of inhaled nanoparticles. J Biomech Eng2008; 130: 011008–1–011008-16.
18.
WangSMInthavongKWenJTuJYXueCL. Comparison of micron- and nanoparticle deposition patterns in a realistic human nasal cavity. Respir Physiol Neurobiol2009; 166(3): 142–151.
19.
InthavongKZhangKTuJY. Numerical modelling and verification of nanoparticle deposition and its application in the nasal cavity and the tracheobronchial. Comput Methods Biol Med Eng2011; 14(7): 633–643.
20.
TuJYInthavongKAhmadiG. Computational fluid and particle dynamics in the human respiratory system, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2013.
21.
PhuongNLItoK. Investigation of flow pattern in a realistic replica model of human respiratory tract using PIV. Build Environ2015; 94: 504–515.
22.
InthavongKWenJTuJYTianZF. From CT scans to CFD modelling – fluid and heat transfer in a realistic human nasal cavity. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech2009; 3: 321–335.
23.
Inthavong K, Tian ZF and Tu JY. CFD simulations on the heating capability in a human nasal cavity. In: Proceedings of the 16th Australasian fluid mechanics conference, Australia, 2007.
24.
SchroeterJDKimbellJSGrossEWillsonGADormanDCTanYMClewellHJ. Application of physiological computational fluid dynamics models to predict interspecies nasal dosimetry of inhaled acrolein. Inhal Toxicol2008; 20: 227–243.
25.
CorleyRAKabilanSKupratAPCarsonJPJacobREMinardKRTeeguardenJGTimchalkCPipavathSGlennyREinsteinDR. Comparative risks of aldehyde constituents in cigarette smoke using transient computational fluid dynamics/physiologically based pharmacokinetic models of the rat and human respiratory tracts. Toxicol Sci2015; 146: 65–88.
26.
ItoK. Toward the development of an in silico human model for indoor environmental design. Proc Jpn Acad, Ser B2016; 92: 185–203.
27.
ItoKMitsumuneKKugaKPhuongNLTaniKInthavongK. Prediction of convective heat transfer coefficients for the upper respiratory tracts of rat, dog, monkey, and humans. Indoor Built Environ2017; 26(6): 828–840.
28.
Indoor Environmental Quality Committee and Risk Assessment Committee. White paper: Electronic cigarettes in the indoor environment. Fairfax: American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA), 2014.
29.
PhuongNLYamashitaMYooS-JItoK. Prediction of convective heat transfer coefficient of human upper and lower airway surfaces in steady and unsteady breathing conditions. Build Environ2016; 100: 172–185.
30.
StapletonKWGuentschEHoskinsonMKFinlayWH. On the suitability of k–ɛ turbulence modeling for aerosol deposition in the mouth and throat: a comparison with experiment. J Aerosol Sci2000; 31: 739–749.
31.
St CharlesFKKrautterGRMarinerDC. Postpuff respiration measures on smokers of different tar yield cigarettes. Inhal Toxicol2009; 21: 712–718.
32.
Chen W, Wang P, Matsuo T, Ito K, Fowles J and Kumagai K. Exposure assessment to e-cigarettes: Part 1 Literature review on carbonyl compounds generation from e-cigarettes and affecting factors. In: Proceedings of healthy buildings America, Boulder, ISIAQ, 19–22 July 2015, pp.456–459.
33.
Chen W, Wang P, Matsuo T, Ito K, Fowles J and Kumagai K. Part 2 A pilot lab study on formation of volatile carbonyls from propylene glycol – a major e-cigarette carrier solvent. In: Proceedings of healthy buildings America, Boulder, ISIAQ, 19–22 July 2015, pp.460–463.
34.
AbeKKondohTNaganoY. A new turbulence model for predicting fluid flow and heat transfer in separating and reattaching flows-I. Flow field calculations. Int J Heat Mass Transf1994; 37(1): 139–151.
35.
ItoKHottaT. Development of virtual manikins and its grid library for CFD analysis. Trans Soc Heat Air-Condition Sanit Eng Jpn2006; 113: 27–34. (in Japanese).
36.
Skistad H (ed.), Mundt E, Nielsen PV, Hagström K, Railio J. REHVA guidebook. No.1. Displacement ventilation system in non-industrial premises. Brussels: REHVA, 2002.
FangerPO. Thermal comfort, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1973.
39.
TanabeSArensEABaumanFSZhangHMadsenTL. Evaluating thermal environments by using a thermal manikin with controlled skin surface temperature. ASHRAE Trans1994; 100(1): 39–48.
40.
ItoKInthavongKKurabuchiTUedaTEndoTOmoriTOnoHKatoSSakaiKSuwaYMatsumotoHYoshinoHZhangWTuJ. CFD benchmark tests for indoor environmental problems: Part 1 Isothermal/non-isothermal flow in two-dimensional and three-dimensional room model. Int J Archit Eng Technol2015; 2(1): 1–22.
41.
ItoKInthavongKKurabuchiTUedaTEndoTOmoriTOnoHKatoSSakaiKSuwaYMatsumotoHYoshinoHZhangWTuJ. CFD benchmark tests for indoor environmental problems: Part 2 Cross-ventilation airflows and floor heating systems. Int J Archit Eng Technol2015; 2(1): 23–49.
42.
ItoKInthavongKKurabuchiTUedaTEndoTOmoriTOnoHKatoSSakaiKSuwaYMatsumotoHYoshinoHZhangWTuJ. CFD benchmark tests for indoor environmental problems: Part 3 Numerical thermal manikins. Int J Archit Eng Technol2015; 2(1): 50–75.
43.
ItoKInthavongKKurabuchiTUedaTEndoTOmoriTOnoHKatoSSakaiKSuwaYMatsumotoHYoshinoHZhangWTuJ. CFD benchmark tests for indoor environmental problems: Part 4 Air-conditioning airflows, residential kitchen airflows and fire-induced flow. Int J Archit Eng Technol2015; 2(1): 76–102.
44.
Sleiman M, Logue J, Montesinos VN, Litter M, Russell M, Gundel L and Destaillats H. Indoor vaping: composition and health impacts of mainstream and secondhand emissions. In: Indoor air 2016, the 14th international conference on indoor air quality and climate, Ghent, Belgium, 3–8 July 2016.
45.
BjørnENielsenPV. Dispersal of exhaled air and personal exposure in displacement ventilated rooms. Indoor Air2002; 12: 147–164.
46.
IARC. IARC monographs, vol. 100F-29. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2012.
47.
BoisaFYJameicMClewelldHJ. PBPK modelling of inter-individual variability in the pharmacokinetics of environmental chemicals. Toxicology2010; 278: 256–267.
48.
LueckeRHPearceBAWosilaitWDDoergeDRSlikkerWJrYoungJF. Windows based general PBPK/PD modeling software. Comput Biol Med2008; 38: 962–978.
49.
AndersenMEGreenTFrederickCBBogdanffyMS. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models for nasal tissue dosimetry of organic esters: Assessing the state-of-knowledge and risk assessment applications with methyl methacrylate and vinyl acetate. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol2002; 36: 234–245.
50.
KimbellJSOvertonJHSubramaniamRPSchlosserPMMorganKTConollyRBMillerFJ. Dosimetry modeling of inhaled formaldehyde: Binning nasal flux predictions for quantitative risk assessment. Toxicol Sci2001; 64: 111–121.
