The study combined quantitative and qualitative approaches, in terms of both staff perception and facility manager perspective, to evaluate the effectiveness of indoor environmental quality (IEQ) of LEED–certified facilities and relationship between IEQ and occupant comfort and productivity in healthcare settings in the USA climate zones 2 and 3. A multiple-methods approach combining a questionnaire survey and semi-structured interview was tested for effective post-occupancy evaluation. The study compared one non-LEED healthcare facility with five LEED certified healthcare buildings and examined which variable(s) had significant relationship with comfort and productivity by surveying 249 occupants and interviewing six facility managers in six healthcare settings. The results showed that five LEED–certified healthcare settings were superior to one non-LEED facility in most of building performance factors. Building design, temperature comfort, image presented to visitors, use of space, control over noise and ability to meet occupants’ needs were significant predictors for overall comfort. Lighting overall, temperature comfort and image presented to visitors had a significant positive relationship with perceived productivity. Only one non-LEED hospital was selected and some buildings had small response rate, the results should be interpreted with caution.
MellaG. IEQ and energy: connecting the dots. Contract2006; 48: 32–32.
4.
YuCWFKimJT. Building environmental assessment schemes for rating of IAQ in sustainable building. Indoor Built Environ2010; 20: 5–15.
5.
LeeYSKimSK. Indoor environmental quality in LEED-certified buildings in the U.S. J Asian Architect Build Eng2008; 7: 293–300.
6.
Birt B and Newsham GR. Post-occupancy evaluation of energy and indoor environment quality in green buildings: a review. In: The 3rd CIB international conference on smart and sustainable built environments, Delft, the Netherlands, June 15–19 2009, CIB, http://nparc.cisti-icist.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/npsi/ctrl?action=shwart&index=an&req=20374714 (accessed 16 March 2014).
7.
Abbaszadeh S, Zagreus L, Lehrer D and Huezenga C. Occupant satisfaction with indoor environment quality in green buildings. In: HB 2006: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on healthy buildings, Lisbon, June 4–8 2006; ISIAQ, 2006, vol. III; pp.365-370.
8.
LandaA. Sustainable building gains ground in CRE. Commercial Prop Executive2010; 24(7): 19–21.
9.
XuanX. Effectiveness of indoor environment quality in LEED-certified healthcare settings. Indoor Built Environ2016; 25(5): 786–798.
10.
LeeYSGuerinDA. Indoor environmental quality related to occupant satisfaction and performance in LEED-certified buildings. Indoor Built Environ2009; 18(4): 293–300.
11.
SyazwanAizatIJulianaJNorhafizalinaOAzmanZAKamaruzamanJ. Indoor Air Quality and Sick Building Syndrome in Malaysian Buildings. Global J Health Sci2009; 1: 126–135.
12.
KosonenRTanF. The effect of perceived indoor air quality on productivity loss. Energy Build2004; 36: 981–986.
13.
KhalilNHusinHN. Post occupancy evaluation towards indoor environment improvement in Malaysia’s office buildings. J Sustainable Develop2009; 2: 186–191.
14.
HarrisDD. Return on investment of a LEED platinum hospital: the influence of healthcare facility environments on healthcare employees and organizational effectiveness. J Hospital Admin2014; 3(6): 37–55.
15.
ThielCLNeedyKLRiesRHuppDBilecMM. Building design and performance: a comparative longitudinal assessment of a Children’s hospital. Build Environ2014; 78: 130–136.
LeamanA. Dissatisfaction and office productivity. Facilities1995; 13: 13–19.
18.
NewshamGBrandJDonnellyCVeitchJAriesMCharlesK. Linking indoor environment conditions to job satisfaction: a field study. Build Res Informat2009; 37: 129–147.
19.
Agha-HosseinMEl-JouziSElmualimAAEllisJWilliamsM. Post-occupancy studies of an office environment: energy performance and occupants’ satisfaction. Build Environ2013; 69: 121–130.
20.
ShepleyMMHarrisDDWhiteR. Open-Bay and single-family room neonatal intensive care units: Caregiver satisfaction and stress. Environ Behavior2008; 40(2): 249–68.21.
21.
BlomkvistVEriksenCATheorellTUlrichRRasmanisG. Acoustics and psychosocial environment in intensive coronary care. Occupat Environ Med2005; 62(3): 132–139.
22.
DascalakiEGGagliaAGBalarasCALagoudiA. Indoor environmental quality in Hellenic hospital operating rooms. Energy Build2009; 41: 551–560.
23.
Marcus CC and Barnes M. Gardens in healthcare facilities: uses, therapeutic benefits, and design recommendations. Report, Center for Health Design, Martinez, CA, 1995.
24.
UlrichRSGilpinLHealing arts: nutrition for the soul. In: FramptonSBGilpinLCharmelPA (eds). Putting patients first: designing and practicing patient-centered care, San Francisco, CA: John, 2003, pp. 117–146.25.
25.
HwangTKimJT. Effects of indoor lighting on occupants’ visual comfort and eye health in a green building. Indoor Built Environ2011; 20: 75–90.
26.
AlimogluMKDonmezL. Daylight exposure and the other predictors of burnout among nurses in a university hospital. Int J Nurs Stud2005; 42(5): 549–555.
27.
UlrichRZimringCQuanXJosephAChoudharyR. The role of the physical environment in the hospital of the 21st century: a once in a life time opportunity, Concord, CA: The Center for Health Design, 2004.
28.
ThomasKAMartinPA. The acoustic environment of hospital nurseries-NICU sound environment and the potential problems for caregivers. J Perinatol2000; 20: S105–S112.
29.
HeerwagenJH. Green buildings, organizational success, and occupant productivity. Build Res Informat2000; 28: 353–367.
30.
WyonDPWargockiPIndoor air quality effects on office work. In: Clements-CroomeD (ed). Creating the productive workplace, 2nd ed. London: Taylor & Francis, 2006.
31.
HuaYOswaldAYangX. Effectiveness of daylighting design and occupant visual satisfaction in a LEED Gold laboratory building. Build Environ2011; 46: 54–64.
32.
HarrisLRBrownGTL. Mixing interview and questionnaire methods: practical problems in aligning data. Pract Assess Res Evaluat2010; 15: 1–19.
33.
BurgessRG. Field research: a sourcebook and field manual, London: Routledge, 1994.
FrontczakMSchiavonSGoinsJArensEAZhangHPDWargockiP. Quantitative relationships between occupant satisfaction and satisfaction aspects of indoor environmental quality and building design. Indoor Air2012; 22(2): 119–131.
39.
LincolnYGubaE. Naturalistic inquiry, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985.
40.
van TeijingenEHunndleyV. The importance of pilot studies. Nurs Stand2002; 16(40): 33–36.
HumphreysMA. Quantifying occupant comfort: are combined indices of the indoor environment practicable?Build Res Informat2005; 33(4): 317–325.
43.
WongLTMuiKWHuiPS. A multivariate-logistic model foracceptance of indoor environmental quality (IEQ) in offices. Build Environ2008; 43: 1–6.
44.
CaoBQinOZhuYLiHHuHDengG. Development of a multivariate regression model for overall satisfaction in public buildings based on field studies in Beijing and Shanghai. Build Environ2012; 47: 394–399.
45.
Wilkins A, Veitch J and Lehman B. LED lighting flicker and potential health concerns: IEEE standard PAR1789 update. Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition. Atlanta, GA, 2010.
46.
KimS-KHwangYLeeYSCorserW. Occupant comfort and satisfaction in green healthcare environments: a survey study focusing on healthcare staff. J Sustainable Develop2015; 8(1): 156–173.
47.
SadatsafaviHWalewskiJTabornM. Patient experience with hospital care - comparison of a sample of green hospitals and non-green hospitals. J Green Build2015; 10(1): 169–185.
48.
BrownZColeRJRobinsonJDowlatabadiH. Evaluating user experience in green buildings in relation to workplace culture and context. Facilities2010; 28(3/4): 225–238.
49.
LeeYSKimSK. Indoor environmental quality in LEED-certified buildings in the U.S. J Asian Architect Build Eng2008; 7(2): 293–300.
50.
NewshamGRBirtBJArsenaultCThompsonAJLVeitchJAManciniSGalasiuADGoverBNMacdonaldLABurnsGJ. Do ‘green’ buildings have better indoor environments? New evidence. Build Res Information2013; 41(4): 415–434.
51.
SinghASyalMKorkmazSGradyS. Costs and benefits of IEQ improvements in LEED office buildings. J Infrastruct Syst2011; 17(2): 86–94.
52.
RavinduSRameezdeenRZuoJZhouZChandratilakeR. Indoor environment quality of green buildings: Case study of an LEED platinum certified factory in a warm humid tropical climate. Build Environ2015; 84(2015): 105–113.
53.
DeubleMPde DearRJ. Green occupants for green buildings: The missing link?Build Environ2012; 56(2012): 21–27.
54.
Hendrich A and Chow M. Maximizing the impact of nursing care quality: a closer look at the hospital work environment and the nurse’s impact on patient-care quality. George institute of technology, http://www.brikbase.org/sites/default/files/chd_hcl_wp4_nursing_impact.pdf (accessed 28 July 2015).
55.
HendrichAChowMPSkierczynskiBALuZ. A 36-hospital time and motion study: How do medical-surgical nurses spend their time?Permanente J2008; 12: 25–34.
56.
WinemanJD. Office design and evaluation: An overview. Environ Behavior1982; 14(3): 271–298.
57.
AltaşNEÖzsoyA. Spatial adaptability and flexibility as parameters of user satisfaction for quality housing. Build Environ1998; 33(5): 315–323.
58.
FrontczakMWargockiP. Literature survey on how different factors influence human comfort in indoor environments. Build Environ2011; 46(4): 922–937.
MakCMLuiYP. The effect of sound on office productivity. Build Services Eng Res Technol2012; 33: 339–345.
61.
ChungTMBurnettJ. Lighting quality surveys in office premises. Indoor Built Environ2000; 9: 335–341.
62.
BayoMGarcíaAGarcíaA. Noise levels in an urban hospital and workers' subjective responses. Arch Environ Health1995; 50(3): 247–251.
63.
HepnerCMBoserRA. Architects' perceptions of LEED indoor environmental quality checklist items on employee productivity. Int J Construction Educat Res2007; 2: 193–208.
64.
BluyssenPMAriesMDommelenPV. Comfort of workers in office buildings: the European HOPE project. Build Environ2011; 46(1): 280–288.
HorsburghCR. Healing by design. New Engl J Med1995; 333: 735–740.
67.
BileyFC. Effects of noise in hospitals. Br J Nursing1994; 3: 110–113.
68.
UlrichR. Effects of interior design on wellness: theory and recent scientific research. J Health Care Interior Des1991; 3: 97–109.
69.
WalchJMRabinBSDayRWilliamsJNChoiKKangJD. The effect of sunlight on postoperative analgesic medication usage: a prospective study of patients undergoing spinal surgery. Psychosomatic Med2005; 67: 156–163.
HultgrenGVKnaveB. Discomfort glare and disturbances from light reflections in an office landscape with CRT display terminals. Appl Ergonomics1974; 5(1): 2–8.
