The buffer effect provided by an atrium is one typical passive strategy used in sustainable building design. Based on a comprehensive evaluation framework that includes both satisfaction and comfort, this research develops two types of graphical visualisation info-graphs. One is a compass reflecting the occupant satisfaction voting, which conveys the level of satisfaction occupants have with the architectural design. The results reflect the health level of the occupants, as well as how efficiently resources are used. The second info-graph is a data cloud that can be used to display a building’s physical environment, and thus convey the distribution of the characteristics of physical environment, such as thermal comfort, lighting, and the acoustic and indoor air quality throughout the entire building. This data cloud directly displays the impact of the passive space on the main building space. Its results illustrate how effectively the building’s indoor environment provides the required levels of occupant comfort and quality of life. Finally, this research uses an example of a green building in a cold climate in China to display its unique method of graphical visualisation analysis. The results highlight the level of environmental performance of the object building in two kinds of info-graphs, as well as optimised possibilities for the atrium and the entire building in both the design and renovation phases.
Zaki WRM, Nawawi AH and Sh. Ahmad S. Case study in passive architecture: energy savings benefit in a detached house in Malaysia. In: Proceedings in the 24th Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, University of Singapore, Singapore, November 22–24, 2007; pp.259–266.
2.
ZakiWRMNawawiAHSh. AhmadS. Energy savings benefit from passive architecture. J Canada Cent Sci Educ2008; 3: 51–63.
3.
SadineniSBMadalaSBoehmRF. Passive building energy savings: a review of building envelope components. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2011; 15: 3617–3631.
4.
FeistWSchniedersJDorerVHaasA. Re-inventing air heating: convenient and comfortable within the frame of the Passive House concept. Energy Build2005; 37: 1186–1203.
5.
BadescuVLaaserNCrutescuRCrutescuMDobrovicescuATsatsaronisG. Modeling, validation and time-dependent simulation of the first large passive building in Romania. Renew Energy2011; 36: 142–157.
6.
XiaW. Study of climate classification based on passive design strategies, Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2008, pp. 38–38.
7.
LiJJ. Animate space effect – the impact evaluation of passive space design in sustainable buildings, Saarbrücken, Germany: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 2015.
8.
Rodriguez-Ubinas E, Montero C, Porteros M, Vega S, Navarro I, Castillo-Cagigal M, Matallanas E, Gutierrez A. Passive design strategies and performance of Net Energy Plus Houses. Energy Build 2014; 5: 13.
9.
BaiGGongGYuCWFZhenO. A combined large multi-facet bulbous façade glazed curtain with open atrium as a natural ventilation solution for an energy efficient sustainable office building in southern China. Indoor Built Environ2015; 24: 813–832.
10.
Li JJ, Song YH and Wang QG. Experimental verification and pair-group analysis study of passive space design strategies. In: 4th International Conference on Civil, Architecture and Hydrauic Engineering, Guangzhou, China, June 20–21, 2015, pp.1313–1317.
11.
ChirasDD. The solar house/passive heating and cooling, Hartford: Chelsea Green publishing Co, 2002, pp. 9–9.
12.
FangZWuW. Nonecological significance of atrium greening. J Nanjing For Univ2006; 6: 92–94.
13.
RichmanRPressnailKD. Quantifying and predicting performance of the solar dynamic buffer zone (SDBZ) curtain wall through experimentation and numerical modeling. Energy Build2010; 42: 522–533.
14.
LaouadiAAtifMRGalasiuA. Towards developing skylight design tools for thermal and energy performance of atriums in cold climates. Build Environ2002; 37: 1289–1316.
15.
LiJJ. Passive adjustment performance of intermediary space in buildings, Beijing, China: Tsinghua University, 2015, pp. 12–12.
16.
SongYHLiJJWangJLHaoSMZhuNLinZH. Multi-criteria approach to passive space design in buildings: impact of courtyard spaces on public buildings in cold climates. Build Environ2015; 89: 295–307.
17.
OsgoodCESuciGJTannenbaumPH. The measurement of meaning, Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1957.
18.
KangJZhangM. Semantic differential analysis of the soundscape in urban open public spaces. Build Environ2010; 45: 150–157.
19.
LiJJSongYHLuSWangQG. Impact evaluation of indoor environmental performance of animate space in buildings. Build Environ2015; 94: 353–370.
20.
Abbaszadeh S, Zagreus L, Lehrer D and Huizenga C. Occupant satisfaction with indoor environmental quality in green buildings. In: HB 2006; the Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Healthy Buildings, ISIAQ, Lisbon, June 4–8, 2006, Vol. 6, pp. 365–370.
21.
ZagreusLHuizengaCArensELehrerD. Listening to the occupants: a web-based indoor environmental quality survey. Indoor Air2004; 14: 65–74.
22.
Soccio P. The EduTool: IEQ – a new post occupancy evaluation tool for communicating to building designers information about the indoor environment quality inside classrooms. In: 13th International Conference On Indoor Air Quality And Climate (Indoor Air 2014), University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, July 7–12, 2014.
23.
Tianjian Huayi Co., Ltd. User manual of Beijing Tianjian Huayi Technology Development Co., Ltd., http://www.tjhykj.com/ (accessed 28 September 2016).
24.
Li JJ, Song YH and Zhao YC. Study on space layout effect of sustainable public building by field work physical environmental test. In: The 10th international conference on green and energy-efficient building, Beijing, March 28, 2014, pp. 1–11.
25.
HummelgaardJJuhlPSæbjörnssonKOClausenGToftumJLangkildeG. Indoor air quality and occupant satisfaction in five mechanically and four naturally ventilated open-plan office buildings. Build Environ2007; 42: 4051–4058.
26.
HaoSMSongYHLiJJZhuN. Field study on indoor thermal and luminous environment in winter of vernacular houses in Northern Hebei Province of China. J Harbin Inst Technol2014; 04: 77–83.
27.
IoanSCalinS. Aspects of indoor environmental quality assessment in buildings. Energy Build2013; 60: 410–419.
28.
HuSXSongHLHuZXieJ. “Ecological architecture” research on green office building. Archit J2000; 05: 10–17.
29.
HuSXHuangKSongH. Effective practice of ecological office building – a comprehensive evaluation on the Design Institute building, Tsinghua University. Archit J2004; 03: 36–40.
30.
SongYHLiJJZhuNWangJLHaoSM. A research on two types of buffer zone impact on surrounding office space environment in winter in cold climate zone. J Harbin Inst Technol2014; 21: 99–105.
31.
SongYHLiJJZhuNWangJLHaoSM. Fieldwork test research of the impact on building physical environment on six types of atrium space in cold climates. J Harbin Inst Technol2014; 21: 99–105.
32.
FangerPO. Fundamentals of thermal comfort. Adv Solar Energy Technol1988; 04: 3056–3061.
33.
Hoyt T, Schiavon S, Piccioli A, Moon D and Steinfeld K. CBE thermal comfort tool. Berkeley: Center for the Built Environment, University of California Berkeley, http://cbe.berkeley.edu/comforttool/ (2013, accessed 16 July 2015).
34.
GB50034-2013. Standard for lighting design of buildings. Beijing: Standardization Administration of China, 2013.
35.
ZhangJF. Indoor air quality testing and air distribution analysis in an office building, Xi’an: Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, 2012.
36.
ASHRAE 62.1-2013. ASHRAE Standard. Ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality, Atlanta, GA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers, 2013.
