The benefits of light shelves over the daylight illuminance in office buildings in Toronto

Abstract

Modern envelope technologies and architectural trends often encourage the adoption of large glazing surfaces. Light shelves are then proposed to reduce glare complaints, while providing better indoor daylight distribution. In this paper, the benefits of light shelves over the illuminance levels in office buildings in Toronto are evaluated. The useful daylight illuminance was used as the metric of analysis in this study. Annual simulations for buildings with different window-to-wall ratios were compared. Moreover, the effects of different window shapes, façade orientation and external obstructing elements were investigated. Results show that in the context of analysis, light shelves increase the useful daylight illuminance values mainly in the first 6 m from the windows and provide a more homogeneous distribution of the daylight. Window-to-wall ratios above 35% consistently result in increasing glare risks. This study indicates that narrow full-height windows provide better daylighting compared to shorter but wider windows. The west orientation shows higher useful daylight illuminance compared to the south-facing ones, although light shelves are far less beneficial when applied to windows but not facing south. Finally, the illuminance levels in buildings with different obstruction angles of the façade are presented in order to provide a comprehensive analysis about the benefits of adopting light shelves in office buildings in the urban context of Toronto, Canada.

Keywords

Natural light Light shelves Useful daylight illuminance Office buildings Lighting simulations

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Carlos

Soler

. Indoor daylight climate-comparison between light shelves and overhang performances in Madrid for hours with unit sunshine fraction and realistic values of model reflectance. Solar Energy 2001; 71: 233–239.

Joarder MAR, Ahmed ZN, Price AD and Mourshed M. A simulation assessment of the height of light shelves to enhance daylighting quality in tropical office buildings under overcast sky conditions in Dhaka, Bangladesh. In: Proceeding of the 11th international IBPSA conference, Glasgow, UK, 27–30 July 2009; pp.920–927.

Ochoa

Capeluto

. Evaluating visual comfort and performance of three natural lighting systems for deep office buildings in highly luminous climates. Build Environ 2006; 41: 1128–1135.

Kischkoweit-Lopin

. An overview of daylighting systems. Solar Energy 2002; 73: 77–82.

IEA Task 21. Daylight in Buildings: a source book on daylighting systems and components. LBNL-47493, Berkeley, CA, 2000.

Cantin

Dubois

. Daylighting metrics based on illuminance, distribution, glare and directivity. Lighting Res Technol 2011; 43: 291–307.

Reinhart

Wienold

. The daylighting dashboard – a simulation-based design analysis for daylit spaces. Build Environ 2011; 46: 386–396.

Tzempelikos

Athienitis

. The impact of shading design and control on building cooling and lighting demand. Solar Energy 2007; 81: 369–382.

Tsang

. An analysis of daylighting performance for office buildings in Hong Kong. Build Environ 2008; 43: 1446–1458.

10.

Palmero-Marrero

Oliviera

. Effect of louver shading devices on building energy requirements. Appl Energy 2010; 87: 2040–2049.

11.

Gonzalez

Fiorito

. Daylight design of office buildings: optimization of external solar shading by using combined simulation methods. Buildings 2015; 5: 560–580.

12.

Cammarano

Pellegrino

Lo Verso

VRM

Aghemo

. Assessment of daylight in rooms with different architectural features. Build Res Inform 2015; 43: 222–237.

13.

Atzeri

Cappelletti

Gasparella

. Internal versus external shading devices performance in office buildings. Energy Procedia 2014; 45: 463–472.

14.

Lim

Ahmad

. The effects of direct sunlight on light shelf performance under tropical sky. Indoor Built Environ 2015; 24: 788–802.

15.

Lim

Ahmad

Ossen

. Internal shading for efficient tropical daylighting in Malaysian contemporary high-rise open plan office. Indoor Built Environ 2013; 22: 932–951.

16.

Carletti

Sciurpi

Pierangioli

. The energy upgrading of existing buildings: window and shading device typologies for energy efficiency refurbishment. Sustainability 2014; 6: 5354–5377.

17.

City of Toronto. Places to grow – growth plan for the greater golden, www.placestogrow.ca/index.php (2012, accessed 18 September 2016).

18.

Wang

Berardi

Akbari

. Comparing the effects of urban heat island effect mitigation strategies in the city of Toronto. Energy Build 2016; 114: 2–19.

19.

US DOE. Building energy software tool directory, http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/tools_directory/subjects.cfm/pagename=subjects/pagename_menu=materials_components/pagename_submenu=lighting_systems (accessed 18 September 2016).

20.

Ochoa

Aries

Hensen

. State of the art in lighting simulation for building science: a literature review. J Build Perform Simul 2012; 5: 209–233.

21.

LBNL. Radiance software. v.4.2, http://radsite.lbl.gov/radiance/ (accessed 18 September 2016).

22.

Lighting Analysts. AGi32 software. v.16, www.agi32.com/ (accessed 18 September 2016).

23.

Tai

Kim

. Advanced external shading device to maximize visual and view performance. Indoor Built Environ 2010; 19: 65–72.

24.

Nabil

Mardaljevic

. Useful daylight illuminance: a new paradigm for assessing daylight in buildings. Lighting Res Technol 2005; 37: 41–59.

25.

LEED v.4 User Guide. Washington, D.C: U.S. Green Building Council.

26.

Berardi

Wang

. Daylighting in an atrium-type high performance house. Build Environ 2014; 76: 92–104.

27.

Gugliermetti

Bisegna

. Daylighting with external shading devices: design and simulation algorithms. Build Environ 2006; 41: 136–149.

28.

Berardi

Anaraki

. Analysis of the impacts of light shelves on the useful daylight illuminance in office buildings in Toronto. Energy Procedia 2015; 78: 1793–1798.

29.

Berardi U. The development of a monolithic aerogel glazed window for an energy retrofitting project. Applied Energy 2015; 154: 603–615.

30.

Alzoubi

Al-Zoubi

. Assessment of building façade performance in terms of daylighting and the associated energy consumption in architectural spaces: vertical and horizontal shading devices for southern exposure facades. Energy Convers Manage 2010; 51: 1592–1599.

31.

Tsang

Edmonds

. Performance of light redirection systems in model buildings under typical sky and building obstruction conditions encountered in Hong Kong. Indoor Built Environ 2011; 20: 638–648.

32.

Illuminating Engineering Society (IES). Approved method: IES spatial daylight autonomy (sDA) and annual sunlight exposure, New York, NY: ASE, 2013.

33.

Mardaljevic J, Andersen M, Roy N and Christoffersen J. Daylighting metrics: is there a relation between useful daylight illuminance and daylight glare probability? In: Proceedings of the building simulation and optimization conference, Loughborough, UK, 10–11 September 2012.

34.

Education Funding Agency, EFA. Daylight design guide, Version 2. Ref. EFA-00725-2014, London, UK: EFA, 2014.

35.

Torres

Lo Verso

VRM

. Comparative analysis of simplified daylight glare methods and proposal of a new method based on the cylindrical illuminance. Energy Procedia 2015; 78: 699–704.