Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

As a part of their very wide range of applications, international standards also represent an excellent technical support to the legislation on comfort and health at the workplace. The existing standards on thermal comfort and on indoor air quality both include limits of acceptability which strongly depend on the category chosen for the investigated work environment. Therefore, the same situation can easily meet compliant or largely exceed specified limits depending on which category is applied. Unfortunately, no clue is currently provided on how to select the appropriate category, and the end-user is left uninformed. In this paper, we present a method to assign limits of acceptability to any work situation whose thermal comfort and indoor air quality must be assessed. The method extends previous work developed specifically for thermal comfort and is based on an algorithm which takes into account three quantities that provide a comprehensive description of the work environment, the activity which is carried out and the sensitivity of individuals. The scheme’s simple modular structure can easily accommodate both changes and additions, should other hypothetical elements be identified to be as relevant to the classification scheme.

Keywords

Thermal comfort IAQ Classification Limits of acceptability Workplace

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ISO 7730:2005. Ergonomics of the thermal environment – analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 2005.

Lenzuni

Freda

del Gaudio

. Classification of thermal environments for comfort assessment. Ann Occup Hyg 2009; 53: 325–332.

prEN 16798-1:2016. Indoor environmental input parameters for the design and assessment of energy performance of buildings. Brussels: CEN/TC 156 WG19–N124, European Committee for Standardization (CEN), 2016.

Olesen

. Revision of EN 15251: indoor Environmental Criteria. REHVA HVAC Eur J 2012; 4: 6–12.

Emmerich SJ and Persily AK. State-of-the-art review of CO₂ demand controlled ventilation technology and application. NISTIR 6729. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standard and Technology, 2001.

Zhang X, Wargocki P and Lian Z. Physiological responses to exposure to carbon dioxide and human bioeffluents. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on industrial ventilation (Ventilation 2015), Shanghai, China, October 26–28 2015; pp.70–78.

Schell

Int-hout

. Demand control ventilation using CO₂. ASHRAE J 2001; 43: 18–29.

prEN 16798-1:2015. Indoor environmental input parameters for the design and assessment of energy performance of buildings. CEN/TC 156–N193. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization (CEN) (superseded by prEN 16798-1:2016), 2015.

Kenney

Munce

. Physiology of aging invited review: aging and human temperature regulation. J Appl Physiol 2003; 95: 2598–2603.

10.

De Giuli

Zecchin

Corain

Salmaso

. Measurements of indoor environmental conditions in Italian classrooms and their impact on children’s comfort. Indoor Built Environ 2015; 24: 689–712.

11.

Khodakarami

Nasrollahi

. Thermal comfort in hospitals – a literature review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2012; 16: 4071–4077.

12.

Melhado MA, Jensen J and Loomans MGLC. Literature review of staff thermal comfort and patient “thermal risks” in operating rooms. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Healthy Building Conference, Lisboa, Portugal, June 4–8 2006, vol. 2, pp.11–14.

13.

ISO 14415:2005. Ergonomics of the thermal environment — application of International Standards to people with special requirements, Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 2005.

14.

Scheuplein

Charnley

Dourson

. Differential sensitivity of children and adults to chemical toxicity, I. biological basis. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2002; 35: 429–447.

15.

Dourson

Charnley

Scheuplein

. Differential sensitivity of children and adults to chemical toxicity, II. risk and regulation. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2002; 35: 448–467.

16.

Health & Consumer Protection Directorate-General Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks (SCHER). Opinion on risk assessment on indoor air quality. Brussels: European Commission http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_scher/docs/scher_o_055.pdf (2007, accessed 3 August 2016).

17.

Makri

Stilianakis

. Vulnerability to air pollution health effects. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2008; 211: 326–336.

18.

EN 12464-1:2011. Light and lighting – lighting of workplaces. Part 1: indoor work places. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization (CEN), 2011.

19.

Junco

Cotten

. No A 4 U: the relationship between multitasking and academic performance. Comput Educ 2012; 59: 505–514.

20.

Arens

Humphreys

de Dear

Zhang

. Are ‘Class A’ temperature requirements realistic or desirable? Build Environ 2010; 45: 4–10.

21.

EN 13779:2007. Ventilation for non-residential buildings – performance requirements for ventilation and room-conditioning systems. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization (CEN), 2007.

A unified method to compute limits of acceptability for thermal comfort and indoor air quality at the workplace

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References