The regulatory framework established by the new European Directive on Building Energy Efficiency requires the implementation of measures to reduce energy consumption and increase the use of renewable sources. Therefore, efficiency improvement implies a reduction of energy demand in buildings, combined with improved performance of passive systems that provide smarter energy saving solutions. These actions have the potential to improve the benchmark of the entire performance, particularly when prioritizing renewable energy sources. At the regional scale, it is necessary to consider environmental conditions during the initial building design to develop smarter buildings with smaller carbon emissions. To address this issue, some Sustainable Building Strategies are proposed on regional scale, methodologically applied to Valencian Community (Spain). This methodology is the outcome of considering local and regional environmental conditions with comfort climograms, allowing designers to recommend passive strategies for correcting thermal discomfort inside buildings. The recommendation process depends on the detailed analysis of the local conditions of each site, i.e. sunlight exposure, radiation values, wind patterns, existence of obstacles, etc. In summary, the here described methodology allows designers to select the best strategies according to the climatic and geographical conditions of each location, thus, helping them to plan smarter buildings.
EsslingerH. Sustainable design: Beyond the innovation-driven business model. J Prod Innov Manage2011; 28(3): 401–404.
2.
LiW. Sustainable design for low carbon architecture. Proc Environ Sci2011; 5: 173–177.
3.
YuFFYangYALiHXiangF. Sustainable design on urban landscape. Adv Mater Res2011; 374–377: 100–104.
4.
BlenginiGADi CarloT. Energy-saving policies and low-energy residential buildings: an LCA case study to support decision makers in Piedmont (Italy). Int J Life Cycle Assess2010; 15: 652–665.
5.
SäynäjokiAHeinonenJJunnilaS. A scenario analysis of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of a new residential area. Environ Res Lett2012; 7(3): 1–10.
6.
NejatPJomehzadehFMahdi TaheriMGohariMZaimi AbdM. A global review of energy consumption, CO2 emissions and policy in the residential sector (with an overview of the top ten CO2 emitting countries). Renew Sustain Energy Rev2015; 43: 843–862.
7.
KyröRHeinonenJJunnilaS. Housing managers key to reducing the greenhouse gas emissions of multi-family housing companies? A mixed method approach. Build Environ2012; 56: 203–210.
8.
LiDPanWLamJ. A comparison of global bioclimates in the 20th and 21st centuries and building energy consumption implications. Build Environ2014; 75: 236–249.
9.
PalmeMIsalguéACochH. Avoiding the possible impact of climate change on the built. Environment: the importance of the building’s energy robustness. Buildings2013; 3: 191–204.
10.
SureshBSSrikanthMRobertFB. Passive building energy savings: a review of building envelope components. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2011; 15: 3617–3631.
11.
RalegaonkarRVGuptaR. Review of intelligent building construction: a passive solar architecture approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2010; 14(8): 2238–2242.
12.
AlmusaedA. Biophilic and bioclimatic architecture. Analytical therapy for the next generation of passive sustainable architecture, Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Springer, 2011.
13.
GargNK. Passive options for thermal comfort in building envelopes—an assessment. Solar Energy1991; 47(6): 437–441.
14.
ParasonisJKeizikasAEndriukaitytėAKalibatienėD. Architectural solutions to increase the energy efficiency of buildings. J Civil Eng Manage2012; 18(1): 71–80.
15.
TerradosFJMorenoD. “Patio” and “Botijo”: energetic strategies’ architectural integration in “Patio 2.12” prototype. Energy Build2014; 83: 70–88.
16.
KyröRHeinonenJSäynäjokiAJunnilaS. Occupants have little influence on the overall energy consumption in district heated apartment buildings. Energy Build2011; 43(12): 3484–3490.
17.
DarUIGeorgesLSartoriINovakovicV. Influence of occupant’s behavior on heating needs and energy system performance: a case of well-insulated detached houses in cold climates. Build Simul2015; 8: 499–513.
18.
MarosoOTGroblerLJ. The dark side of occupant’s behavior on building energy use. Energy Build2010; 42: 173–177.
19.
YangLYanHLamJC. Thermal comfort and building energy consumption implications – a re-view. J Appl Energy2014; 115: 164–173.
20.
Ürge-VorsatzDTirado-HerreroS. Building synergies between climate change mitigation and energy poverty alleviation. Energy Policy2012; 49: 83–90.
21.
FrontczakMSchiavonSGoinsJArensEZhangHWargockiP. Quantitative relationships between occupant satisfaction and satisfaction aspects of indoor environmental quality and building design. Indoor Air2012; 22: 119–131.
22.
Gil-GarciaJRHelbigNOjoA. Being smart: emerging technologies and innovation in the public sector. Govern Info Q2014; 31(1): I1–I8.
23.
SolaimaniSKeijzer-BroersWBouwmanH. What we do – and don’t – know about the Smart Home: an analysis of the Smart Home literature. Indoor Built Environ2015; 24(3): 370–383.
24.
ShavivE. Design tools for bio-climatic and passive solar buildings. Solar Energy2000; 67(4–6): 189–204.
25.
Mosannenzadeh F and Vettorato D. Defining smart city. A conceptual framework based on keyword analysis. In: Papa R (ed) Eighth international conference INPUT -. Smart city - Planning for energy, transportation and sustainability of the urban system. Naples, Italy: University of Naples, June 2014.
26.
OdendaalN. Information and communication technology and local governance: understanding the difference between cities in developed and emerging economies. Comput Environ Urban Syst2003; 27: 585–607.
27.
Marsa-MaestreILopez-CarmonaMAVelascoJRNavarroA. Mobile agents for service personalization in smart environments. J Netw2008; 3(5): 30–41.
28.
LamJYangLLiuJ. Development of passive design zones in China using bioclimatic approach. Energy Conv Manage2006; 47: 746–762.
29.
YuCKimJT. Building environmental assessment schemes for rating of IAQ in sustainable buildings. Indoor Built Environ2011; 20(1): 5–15.
30.
MacielAAFordBLambertsR. Main influences on the design philosophy and knowledge basis to bioclimatic integration into architectural design. The example of best practices. Build Environ2007; 42: 3762–3773.
31.
BrandoniCPolonaraF. The role of municipal energy planning in the regional energy-planning process. Energy2012; 48: 323–338.
32.
MillerWBuysLBellJ. Performance evaluation of eight contemporary passive solar homes in subtropical Australia. Build Environ2012; 56: 57–68.
33.
TodorovicM. BPS, energy efficiency and renewable energy sources for buildings greening and zero energy cities planning. Harmony and ethics of sustainability. Energy Build2012; 48: 180–189.
34.
Givoni BA. In: Henry JC (ed.) Man, Climate and Architecture. University of Sydney, Australia: Elsevier Architectural Science Series, 1969.
35.
Givoni B. Man climate and architecture. London: Applied Science Publishers, 1981.
36.
Rincón MartínezJCFuentes FreixanetVA. Bioclimatic analysis tool: an alternative to facilitate and streamline preliminary studies. Energy Proc2014; 57: 1374–1382.
ChenMWangWKumarA. Prediction of monthly-mean temperature: the roles of atmospheric and land initial conditions and sea surface temperature. J Climate2010; 23: 717–725.
39.
Milne M, Ligget R, Benson A and Bhattacharya Y. Climate consultant 4.0 develops design guidelines for each unique climate. In: Milne M, Liggett R, Benson A and Bhattacharya Y (eds). Buffalo, New York: American Solar Energy Society Meeting, 2009.
40.
ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2004. Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. Atlanta, GA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc., 2004.
41.
Visitsak S. An evaluation of the bioclimatic chart for choosing design strategies for a thermostatically-controlled residence in selected climates. PhD Thesis, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, USA, 2007.
42.
Beck B. Grand challenges of the future for environmental modeling. Report of the NSF Project (Award # 0630367), University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA, 2009.
43.
OrehounigKMahdaviADoppelbauerEMLoiblWTötzerT. Projections of design implications on energy performance of future cities: a case study from Vienna. Sustain Cities Soc2014; 12: 92–101.
44.
PielkeRAUliaszM. Use of meteorological models as input to regional and mesoscale air quality models—limitations and strengths. Atmos Environ1998; 32(8): 1455–1466.
45.
AllegriniJOrehounigKMavromatidisGRueschFDorerVEvinsR. A review of modelling approaches and tools for the simulation of district-scale energy systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2015; 52: 1391–1400.
46.
Mohidin H and Ismail A. Regional design approach in designing climatic responsive administrative building in the 21st century. In: IOP conference series: Earth and environmental science, vol. 23, 2015; p.012016.
