Understanding the role of building management in the low-energy performance of passive sustainable design: Practices of natural ventilation in a UK office building

Abstract

The gap between the anticipated and measured environmental performance of energy-efficient buildings is a well-documented issue for the sustainability of the indoor and built environment. The significance of building users and their social practices is persistently underestimated in relation to this performance gap. The sociotechnical research agenda advocates the consideration of design/user interactions and the significance of building management is also being recognised. Conceptual development through the application of social practice theory has sought to overcome the established dualism between building technologies and user behaviour, and the changeable nature of practices in response to active sustainable design technologies has been evidenced. This research paper presents the findings of a qualitative study of an office building in an urban context in the UK. The building constitutes a passive sustainable design solution combining various natural ventilation technologies, including thermal mass, cross-ventilation, operable window design and solar shading. The analysis investigates the underperformance of the building’s energy efficient design in relation to building management as an intermediation process in driving and embedding new practices of natural ventilation.

Keywords

Building management Natural ventilation Passive sustainable design Performance gap Social practices

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Guy

Shove

. A sociology of energy, buildings and the environment: constructing knowledge, designing practice, London: Routledge, 2000.

Rydin

Environmental impacts and the property market. In: Breheny

(ed). Sustainable development and urban form, London: Pion, 1992, pp. 217–241.

Cole

. Building green: moving beyond regulations and voluntary initiatives. Policy Options 2005; 4: 53–60.

Bordass

Cohen

Standeven

Leaman

. Assessing building performance in use 3: energy performance of the Probe buildings. Build Res Inform 2001; 29: 114–128.

Bordass W, Cohen R, and Field J. Energy performance of non-domestic buildings: closing the credibility gap. In: 3rd International Conference on Improving Energy Efficiency in Commercial Buildings. Frankfurt, Germany, 21–22 April 2004.

Janda

. Buildings don’t use energy: people do. Architect Sci Rev 2011; 54: 15–22.

Shove

. Gaps, barriers and conceptual chasms: theories of technology transfer and energy in buildings. Energy Policy 1998; 26: 1105–1112.

Geels

. Technological transitions and system innovations: a co-evolutionary and socio-technical analysis, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2005.

Rohracher

. The role of users in the social shaping of environmental technologies. Innovation: Eur J Soc Sci Res 2003; 16: 177–192.

10.

Rohracher

. Managing the technological transition to sustainable construction of buildings: a socio-technical perspective. Technol Anal Strat Manag 2001; 13: 137–150.

11.

Silverstone

Hirsch

Morley

Information and communication technologies and the moral economy of the household. In: Silverstone

(ed). Consuming technologies. Media and information in domestic spaces, London: Routledge, 1992, pp. 15–28.

12.

Lie

Sørensen

. Making technology our own?: domesticating technology into everyday life, Oslo: Scandinavian University Press, 1996.

13.

Aune

Berker

Bye

. The missing link which was already there: building operators and energy management in non-residential buildings. Facilities 2009; 27: 44–55.

14.

Giddens

. The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.

15.

Warde

. Consumption and theories of practice. J Cons Cult 2005; 5: 131–153.

16.

Reckwitz

. Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing. Eur J Social Theory 2002; 5: 243–263.

17.

Schatzki

. Social practices: a Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

18.

Bourdieu

. Outline of a theory of practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.

19.

Crosbie

Guy

. En‘lightening’ energy use: the co-evolution of household lighting practices. Int J Environ Technol Manag 2008; 9: 220–235.

20.

Gram-Hanssen

. Residential heat comfort practices: understanding users. Build Res Inform 2010; 38: 175–186.

21.

Gram-Hanssen

. Standby consumption in households analyzed with a practice theory approach. J Industr Ecol 2010; 14: 150–165.

22.

Shove

. Comfort, cleanliness and convenience: the social organization of normality, Oxford: Berg, 2003.

23.

Parkhurst

Parnaby

. Growth in mobile air-conditioning: a socio-technical research agenda. Build Res Inform 2008; 36: 351–362.

24.

Shove

Chappells

Lutzenhiser

Hackett

. Comfort in a lower carbon society. Build Res Inform 2008; 36: 307–311.

25.

Gram-Hanssen K, Christensen TH, and Petersen PE. Heat pumps and user practices–energy reductions or increased comfort? In: 6th Dubrovnik Conference: Sustainable development of energy, water and environmental systems. Dubrovnik, Croatia, 25–29 September 2011, p.10.

26.

Aune

. Energy comes home. Energy Policy 2007; 35: 5457–5465.

27.

Hargreaves

Nye

Burgess

. Making energy visible: a qualitative field study of how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors. Energy Policy 2010; 38: 6111–6119.

28.

Strengers

Maller

. Integrating health, housing and energy policies: social practices of cooling. Build Res Inform 2011; 39: 154–168.

29.

Grandclément

Karvonen

Guy

. Negotiating comfort in low energy housing: the politics of intermediation. Energy Policy 2015; 84: 213–222.

30.

Flyvbjerg

. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitat Inquiry 2006; 12: 219–245.

31.

CIBSE. Energy Benchmarks: CIBSE TM46, London: CIBSE, 2008.