Hybrid ventilation employing both natural ventilation and air-conditioning (AC) is used in Taiwanese schools as a mechanism to maintain indoor environmental quality. A field survey was conducted in two high schools in central Taiwan, one adopting a centralized management for control of AC use and the other employing a user-controlled approach, to investigate the influence of AC management scheme on thermal perception as well as the behaviours of AC usage. As shown in the results, the AC usage was significantly affected by the managerial scheme selected for AC control. When the AC was in use, the mean operative temperature (top) in the classroom regulated under central management was 2.9℃ less than the value observed in user management. The cumulative hours of AC operation in central management was three folds of the level recorded in user management. Linear regression of thermal sensation vote against top indicated a greater thermal sensitivity in the user management group to the shift of top. These findings provide insights on the attributes of adaptive thermal comfort, which may facilitate design in hybrid ventilation that balances between energy-saving and thermal comfort, particularly in areas of similar weather to that of Taiwan.
EmmerichSJ. Simulated performance of natural and hybrid ventilation systems in an office building. HVAC&R Res2006; 12(4): 975–1004.
2.
LiangHHLinTPHwangRL. Linking occupants’ thermal perception and building thermal performance in naturally ventilated school buildings. Appl Energy2012; 94: 355–363.
3.
Heiselberg P and Tjelflaat PO. Design procedure for hybrid ventilation. In: Proceedings of HybVent Forum’99, first international one-day forum on natural and hybrid ventilation, The University of Sydney, Chippendale, NSW, Australia, September 28 1999; paper no. 104, pp. 1–9.
4.
BragerGBakerL. Occupant satisfaction in mixed-mode buildings. Build Res Informat2009; 37(4): 369–380.
5.
HeiselbergP. Principles of hybrid ventilation, Aalborg, Denmark: Ventilation Centre, Aalborg University, 2002, pp. 73–73.
6.
Ackerly K, Baker L and Brager G. Window use in mixed-mode buildings: a literature review. Summary Report, Center for the Built Environment, University of California, Berkeley, USA, April 2011.
7.
AndersenRVToftumJAndersenKKOlesenBW. Survey of occupant behaviour and control of indoor environment in Danish dwellings. Energy Build2009; 41: 11–16.
8.
Nakaya T, Matsubara N and Kurazumi Y. Use of occupant behaviour to control the indoor climate in Japanese Residences. In: Proceedings of conference: air conditioning and the low carbon cooling challenge, Cumberland Lodge, Windsor, UK, July 27–29 2008.
9.
RijalHBHumphreysMANicolJF. Understanding occupant behaviour: the use of controls in mixed-mode office buildings. Build Res Informat2009; 37(4): 381–396.
10.
IndragantiM. Behavioural adaptation and the use of environmental controls in summer for thermal comfort in apartments in India. Energy Build2010; 42: 1019–1025.
11.
Rijal HB, Humphreys MA and Nicol JF. How do the occupants control the temperature in mixed-mode buildings? Predicting the use of passive and active controls. In: Proceedings of conference: air conditioning and the low carbon cooling challenge, Cumberland Lodge, Windsor, UK, July 27–29 2008.
12.
TuohyPGHumphreysMANicolJFRijalHBClarkeJA. Occupant behaviour in naturally ventilated and hybrid buildings. ASHRAE Trans2009; 115(1): 6099–6120.
13.
RijalHBTuohyPHumphreysMANicolJFSamuelAClarkeJA. Using results from field surveys to predict the effect of open windows on thermal comfort and energy use in buildings. Energy Build2007; 39: 823–836.
14.
NicolFJHumphreysMA. A stochastic approach to thermal comfort – occupant behaviour and energy use in buildings. ASHRAE Trans2004; 110(2): 554–568.
15.
Ezzeldin S, Rees S and Cook M. Energy and carbon emission savings due to hybrid ventilation of office buildings in arid climates. In: PLEA 2008 – the 25th conference on passive and low energy architecture, Dublin, Ireland, October 22–24 2008; paper no. 589.
16.
Cron F and Inard C. Analysis of hybrid ventilation performance in France. In: Eighth international IBPSA conference, Eindhoven, Netherlands, August 11–14 2003; pp. 243–250.
17.
NiachouKHassidSSantamourisMLivadaI. Experimental performance investigation of natural, mechanical and hybrid ventilation in urban environment. Build Environ2008; 43: 1373–1382.
18.
Utzinger DM. Hybrid ventilation systems and high performance buildings. In: PLEA2009 – the 26th conference on passive and low energy architecture, Quebec City, Canada, June 22–24 2009.
19.
Frank T, Güttinger H and Velsen SV. Thermal comfort measurements in a hybrid ventilated office room. In: Proceedings of Clima 2007–WellBeing Indoors, Helsinki, Finland, June 10–14 2007.
20.
Mumovic D. A comparative analysis of the indoor air quality and thermal comfort in schools with natural, hybrid and mechanical ventilation strategies. In: Proceedings of Clima 2007–WellBeing Indoors, Helsinki, Finland, June 10–14 2007.
21.
HaaseMAmatoA. An investigation of the potential for natural ventilation and building orientation to achieve thermal comfort in warm and humid climates. Sol Energy2009; 83(3): 389–399.
22.
JiYLomasKJCookMJ. Hybrid ventilation for low energy building design in south China. Build Environ2009; 44: 2245–2255.
23.
HwangRLLinTPChengMJHoMC. Thermal perceptions, general adaptation methods and occupant’s idea on trade-off among thermal comfort and energy saving in hot-humid regions. Build Environ2009; 44: 1128–1134.
24.
MurakamiYTeranoMMizutaniKHaradaMKunoS. Field experiments on energy consumption and thermal comfort in the office environment controlled by occupants’ requirements from PC terminal. Build Environ2007; 42: 4022–4027.
25.
ISO 7726:2001. Ergonomics of the thermal environment—instruments for measuring physical quantities, Geneva: International Standard Organization, 2001.
26.
ASHRAE Standard 55:2010. Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. Atlanta, GA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE), 2010.
27.
Nicol JF. Characterising occupant behaviour in buildings: towards a stochastic model of occupant use of windows, lights, blinds, heaters and fans. In: Proceedings of seventh international IBPSA conference, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, August 13–15 2001.
